Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

HPV types, HIV and invasive cervical carcinoma risk in Kampala, Uganda: a case-control study



While the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) with cervical cancer is well established, the influence of HIV on the risk of this disease in sub-Saharan Africa remains unclear. To assess the risk of invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) associated with HIV and HPV types, a hospital-based case-control study was performed between September 2004 and December 2006 in Kampala, Uganda. Incident cases of histologically-confirmed ICC (N=316) and control women (N=314), who were visitors or care-takers of ICC cases in the hospital, were recruited. Blood samples were obtained for HIV serology and CD4 count, as well as cervical samples for HPV testing. HPV DNA detection and genotyping was performed using the SPF10/DEIA/LiPA25 technique which detects all mucosal HPV types by DEIA and identifies 25 HPV genotypes by LiPA version 1. Samples that tested positive but could not be genotyped were designated HPVX. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by logistic regression, adjusting for possible confounding factors.


For both squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma of the cervix, statistically significantly increased ORs were found among women infected with HPV, in particular single HPV infections, infections with HPV16-related types and high-risk HPV types, in particular HPV16, 18 and 45. For other HPV types the ORs for both SCC and adenocarcinoma were not statistically significantly elevated. HIV infection and CD4 count were not associated with SCC or adenocarcinoma risk in our study population. Among women infected with high-risk HPV types, no association between HIV and SCC emerged. However, an inverse association with adenocarcinoma was observed, while decrease in CD4 count was not associated with ICC risk.


The ORs for SCC and adenocarcinoma were increased in women infected with HPV, in particular single HPV infections, infections with HPV16- and 18-related types, and high-risk HPV types, specifically HPV16, 18 and 45. HIV infection and CD4 count were not associated with SCC or adenocarcinoma risk, but among women infected with high-risk HPV types there was an inverse association between HIV infection and adenocarcinoma risk. These results suggest that HIV and CD4 count may have no role in the progression of cervical cancer.


Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer, and the risk of cervical cancer differs [1] according to HPV type. HIV infection has also been associated with cervical cancer risk [2], which seems to vary according to co-infection with different HPV types [3, 4]. The association between HIV and cervical cancer appears to be less evident in low-income countries, notably sub-Saharan Africa, than in high-income countries [5, 6]. Two studies conducted at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in Uganda [7] and Tanzania [8], which assessed HIV infection and cervical cancer, showed no association. However, a positive association has been observed in Western countries such as Italy, France and Spain [5, 9, 10], as well as in some recent studies from Uganda [11] and Tanzania [12]. Whether these differences in cervical cancer risk between studies can be explained by differences in co-infection with specific HPV types remains unclear.

We present here results from a study of invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) in relation to HPV status, HIV status and CD4 count in Uganda, where the estimated world-standardised incidence rates of cervical cancer is rising and is now 52.4 per 100 000 women [13].


We conducted a hospital-based case-control study in Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, which is the national referral and teaching hospital for Makerere University. The hospital admits about 30 ICC cases each month.

Patients attending the gynaecological clinics or emergency section are mostly residents of Kampala City and the surrounding areas, with a population of about 1 000 000, although some come directly from areas outside Kampala. Like most urban areas of Uganda, HIV prevalence is relatively high in Kampala [14]. Recruitment of ICC cases and control women was done by selected nurses and midwives working in the gynaecological wards or clinics, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria described below.

Recruitment of ICC cases

Patients eligible for the study were women aged 18 to 74 years, residents of Uganda for at least 2 years and consecutively diagnosed with incident ICC during the period September 2004 to September 2006. ICC cases recruited had not yet undergone primary treatment, signed a written informed consent form to participate in the study, and were able to provide biological samples. ICC cases were excluded if tissue and blood samples could not be collected because they were in a terminal stage, or for any other reason that might interfere with established patterns of patient care.

Recruitment of control women

At the Mulago Hospital, all hospitalised patients have one or more accompanying persons, who are responsible for preparing food and taking care of basic hygiene needs and other patient requirements. These accompanying persons are in general female members of the same family or clan. Control women were recruited among those accompanying or visiting ICC cases. The motivation to enrol relatives of the cancer patients as controls was to avoid bias by including control women who would most likely live in the same areas of the Country as the ICC cases and would have a similar social background. In addition, control women would probably have used the same hospital as the ICC cases if they had had a cervical cancer diagnosis. Since the evaluation of family history of cervical cancer was not part of our study hypothesis, the inclusion of blood relatives of ICC cases did not constitute a problem.

Control women were frequency matched to ICC cases by 5-year age groups. Inclusion criteria for control women were the same as for ICC cases (i.e. resident of Uganda for at least 2 years, aged 18 to 74 years between September 2004 and December 2006, able to give informed consent and willing to provide biological samples), save the cervical cancer diagnosis.

Control women were offered a pelvic examination with visual inspection of the cervix uteri and Pap smear screening test. Test results were made available to control women before they left the hospital (i.e. during the period of hospitalisation of the ICC cases they accompanied). Women in whom pre-malignant and malignant cervical abnormalities were suspected or detected were referred for standard follow-up diagnosis and treatment at Mulago Hospital. A symptomatic diagnosis of cervical and vaginal infections was done by the gynaecologists examining control women, and appropriate antibiotic treatment was offered free of charge whenever indicated.

Collection of biological samples and study procedures

Information about reproductive history, lifestyle practices and sexual behaviour was assessed using a standardised questionnaire administered by the nurses or midwives recruiting ICC cases and control women. Blood was obtained for a full blood count, HIV serological testing, and CD4 count. All subjects underwent pelvic and abdominal examinations, and cervical samples were obtained for diagnosis and HPV detection.

For ICC cases, biopsies of the cervical lesions were collected under general anaesthesia. Samples were immediately stored in sterile specimen tubes and transported in a flask containing ice to the pathology laboratory. There the specimen was divided into two parts: one part was fixed in 10% buffered formalin (for 12 to 24 hours) for histological processing and diagnosis, and the other half was kept in a Nunc tube, labelled and stored at -70°C until shipped for HPV testing. Biopsy samples were processed using the automatic tissue processor; they were paraffin embedded, sectioned at 4 μm thickness and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin.

For control women, exfoliated cervical cells were collected with two Cervex brushes before any treatment for cervical or vaginal infection was administered. The first brush was rinsed in PreservCyt solution (ThinPrep, Hologic, Marlborough, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and kept at room temperature until shipped to the laboratory for HPV testing. The second brush was used to make a smear and stained with Pap stain; smears were classified as normal or abnormal. All histological and cytological diagnoses were done by a pathologist at the Department of Pathology, Makerere University.

HIV testing and CD4 count

HIV was measured using a rapid test [15], which was the recommended test in Uganda during the study period (Ministry of Health of Uganda). Briefly, blood was initially tested by the Capillus method (Capillus HIV-1/HIV-2 (CP) (Trinity Biotech, Galway, Ireland). Negative results were reported as negative, and no other confirmatory test was done. For positive results a confirmatory test using Serocard (Trinity Biotech, Galway, Ireland) was performed. When results from Serocard were positive, they were reported as positive. However, if the results from Serocard were negative, a tiebreaker test using the Multispot test (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was applied, and the results reported as negative or positive depending on the results of this test. All tests were done according to the manufacturer's instructions. HIV was assessed as positive (exposed) or negative (not exposed). These test algorithms have 100% sensitivity and specificity [15]. CD4 count was done using flow cytometry with the Becton Dickinson FACSCount automated instrument (BD FACSCount™, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

HPV testing

The frozen ICC samples and the exfoliated cervical cell samples (in ThinPrep) from control women were shipped to DDL Diagnostic Laboratory (DDL), Voorburg, the Netherlands, for HPV analysis. Frozen samples were shipped in dry ice, while ThinPrep samples were shipped at room temperature. DNA was extracted from the frozen biopsy sections using proteinase K. From the suspension of cervical cells, DNA was isolated by use of a MagNA Pure LC instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using the total nucleic acid isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics).

SPF10 PCR was performed using 10 μl isolated DNA in a final reaction volume of 50 μl. Ten μl of the amplified PCR product was tested with a cocktail of general probes recognising at least 54 mucosal HPV types in a microtitre plate format for the detection of HPV DNA by use of DNA enzyme immunoassay (DEIA). Optical densities (OD450) were read on a microtitre plate reader. Subsequently, for HPV DNA-positive samples, 10 μl of the same SPF10 amplimer was genotyped by the SPF10-LiPA25 test (version 1, produced at Labo Biomedical Products, Rijswijk, the Netherlands). By reverse hybridisation of the SPF10 amplimer with 28 different probes on the LiPA strip, 25 HPV genotypes can be identified: HPV6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68/73, 70, 74. The sequence variation within the SPF10 primers allows the recognition of these different HPV genotypes, except for HPV68 and 73, as their innerprimer regions are identical and cannot be distinguished in this test. The positive hybridisation on the strips is visualised as a purple band by means of a precipitating colour substrate on the probe site. Samples that were HPV DNA-positive by SPF10 PCR-DEIA, but for which no type was identified by the LiPA25 strip, were designated as HPVX.

For HPV-negative ICC cases, a beta-globin PCR was performed to assess the quality of DNA isolated from the biopsy.

Ethical consideration

The study protocol was approved by the Higher Degree's Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Makerere University, and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology. The study also complied with the ethical norms of Mulago Hospital and those of the Ministry of Health of Uganda. All the study participants signed a written informed consent form before inclusion in the study.

Data analysis

Our analytical strategy was based on the assumption that normal cervical cells persistently infected with high-risk HPV types may undergo several mutations, which can eventually lead to the development of ICC. In our study cervical samples for HPV testing were collected at the time of cancer diagnosis (and corresponding calendar time among control women). Therefore HPV infections are only to be considered as indicators of persistent HPV infection(s).

We also wanted to test the hypothesis that HIV infection per se is associated with cervical cancer risk (as this is a question mark in the literature), and moreover whether the lowered immunity caused by HIV infection or by other causes (as reflected by decreased CD4 count) is associated with this risk. HIV infection and decline in CD4 count may increase the probability of acquiring an HPV infection, or decrease the probability of clearing an HPV infection.

To evaluate the risk of ICC, SCC and adenocarcinoma were analysed separately, and odds ratios (OR) and corresponding two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression models. To address the problem of small sample sizes, we calculated the logistic regression using Firth's penalised likelihood approach [16]. As a consequence of the small sample size it was only possible to estimate the lower or upper limit of the CI for some ORs. We fitted age-adjusted models for SCC and adenocarcinoma of the cervix for women classified according to:

  1. a)

    Each HPV type or group of HPV types,

  2. b)

    HIV status (positive or negative),

  3. c)

    CD4 count per 100 cell decrease, as a linear continuous variable(s),

  4. d)

    Each HPV type and group of HPV types in subgroups of women classified according to HIV status,

  5. e)

    HIV status and CD4 count (with groups of >300 or ≤300 and >500 or ≤500 cells) among women who were infected with high-risk HPV types only.

The groups of HPV types analysed were "any HPV infection"; "single HPV infections" for any HPV infection except HPVX; "multiple HPV infections", i.e. concomitant infection with more than one HPV type, except for HPVX; "high-risk HPV types" for infections with any of the HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68 or 73; "low-risk HPV types" for infections with any of the HPV types 6, 11, 34, 40, 42, 43, 44, 53, 54, 66, 70 or 74; "HPV16-related types" for any of the HPV types 16, 31, 33, 35, 52 or 58; "HPV18-related types" for any of the types 18, 39, 45, 59 or 68; and HPVX.

In the analysis of ICC risk according to HIV status, adjustment for CD4 count was done to rule out the possibility that HIV had an influence on risk before affecting immune status (reflected by a decrease in CD4 count).

The statistical software SAS version 9.2 procedure logistic was used for all analyses. All tests of statistical hypotheses were made on the two-sided 5% level of significance.


During the study period, 484 women with a diagnosis of preliminary incident ICC and 385 control women were approached and invited to participate in the study. Sixty-six (66) potential ICC cases and 22 control women declined to participate, and 41 ICC cases and 44 control women were excluded due to incomplete questionnaires or inability to provide biological samples. Further, 61 potential ICC cases were excluded because ICC diagnosis was not confirmed by histology, as well as five control women who had cervical lesions compatible with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Thus, a total of 316 ICC cases (265 SCC, 42 adenocarcinomas, 5 mixed histology and 4 other histology) and 314 control women were recruited into the study. Of these, cervical samples for HPV testing were obtained from 255 ICC cases (215 SCC, 32 adenocarcinomas and 8 other histological types) and 309 controls. Following HPV testing, 16 of the 255 ICC cases had to be excluded as their samples were beta-globin-negative, leaving 239 ICC cases in the final analysis (Table 1).

Table 1 Subject enrolment and measurements

The clinical and demographic characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 2. A smaller proportion of ICC cases than control women had ever had a Pap smear, and ICC cases had proportionally more HPV infections than control women.

Table 2 Clinical and demographic characteristics of invasive cervical carcinoma cases and control women

Among the 239 ICC cases and 309 control women, HPV DNA was detected in 222 (92.9% of 239) and 95 (30.7% of 309) women, respectively. Seventeen ICC cases (7.1%) were HPV-negative.

There were no other statistically significant differences between ICC cases and control women regarding characteristics, including HIV positivity. The HIV test was positive in 55 (18.8%) ICC cases and 54 (17.5%) control women (Table 2).

SCC and HPV infection

For SCC, the age-adjusted ORs were statistically significantly increased for any HPV infection (OR 50.8, 95% CI: 25.8-113.9), single HPV infections (OR 33.3, 95% CI: 20.2-56.7), HPV16-related types (OR 11.6, 95% CI: 7.5-18.5), HPV18-related types (OR 9.4, 95% CI: 5.3-17.4), and high-risk HPV types (OR 64.5, 95% CI: 35.4-126.6), in particular HPV16 (OR 29.1, 95% CI: 15.4-60.7), HPV18 (OR 9.6, 95% CI: 4.6-22.3), and HPV45 (OR 58.7, 95% CI: lower limit >7.9).

Multiple HPV infections and infections with low-risk HPV types were not associated with an increased OR for SCC. Adjustment for HIV as well as decline in CD4 count (-100 cells) did not substantially change the OR estimates among the different groups of HPV types (Table 3).

Table 3 Riska of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix for different human papillomavirus (HPV) types

SCC according to HPV type in HIV-negative and -positive women

The association between infection with different HPV types and SCC was rather similar in HIV-negative and -positive women. However, the number of HIV-positive SCC in our study (N = 42) was limited, and therefore the CIs of our OR estimates were rather broad (Table 4).

Table 4 Risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix according to different human papillomavirus (HPV) types and HIV serology

Adenocarcinoma and HPV infection

The ORs for adenocarcinoma were statistically significantly increased for any HPV infection (OR 12.9, 95% CI: 5.0-41.8), single HPV infections (OR 13.7, 95% CI: 6.0-34.0), infection with HPV16-related types (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-8.2), HPV18-related types (OR 22.8, 95% CI: 9.3-58.9), and high-risk HPV types, in particular HPV 16 (OR 11.6, 95% CI: 4.3-31.8), 18 (OR 18.5, 95% CI: 6.6-54.4) and 45 (OR 297.4, 95% CI: lower limit >26.4). Adjustment for HIV status as well as decline in CD4 count (-100 cells) did not substantially change the OR for the different groups of HPV types (Table 5).

Table 5 Risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix for different human papillomavirus (HPV) typesa

Adenocarcinoma according to HPV type in HIV-negative and -positive women

Given the very low number of HIV-positive adenocarcinomas (N = 4) in our study, our risk estimates are not sufficiently precise to reach any conclusions about differences between HIV-negative and -positive women, but there was no evidence of a difference in risk (Table 6).

Table 6 Risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix according to different human papillomavirus (HPV) types and HIV serology

SCC and adenocarcinoma according to HIV status

Table 7 shows the overall OR for SCC and adenocarcinoma in relation to HIV infection. There was no association between HIV positivity and SCC (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9-2.3) or adenocarcinoma (OR 1.1, 95% CI: 0.4-2.7) in age-adjusted models.

Table 7 Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix according to HIV infection and adjustment factors: age, CD4 count (decrease of 100 cells), and human papillomavirus (HPV) types

In statistical models adjusting for age and decline in CD4 count (-100 cells), HIV-positive women had an increased OR for SCC (OR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0-2.6) of borderline significance. However, the OR for SCC among HIV-positive women was no longer statistically significant after further adjustment for different groups of HPV infections (adjustment for age, CD4 count and any HPV infection: OR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.4-1.4), except when we adjusted for infection with low-risk HPV types alone (OR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.2) and multiple HPV infections (OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.0), when the lower CIs were of borderline statistical significance (Table 7). There was no evidence of association between HIV infection and adenocarcinoma in any of the statistical models tested in Table 7.

SCC and adenocarcinomas according to CD4 count

Decline in CD4 count (-100 cells) was not statistically significantly associated with SCC (OR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4) or adenocarcinoma (OR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.1-2.6) in age-adjusted models including all women with available information in the study, nor in analyses adjusting for HIV and individual HPV types, or groups of HPV types (data not shown).

HIV infection, CD4 count and SCC and adenocarcinoma risk among women infected with high-risk HPV types

Table 8 shows the overall age-adjusted OR for SCC and adenocarcinoma according to HIV infection and decline in CD4 count (-100 cells) among women who were infected with high-risk HPV types (i.e. ICC cases and control women who were not infected with a high-risk HPV type were excluded from this analysis). HIV positivity was not associated with SCC risk (OR 0.7, 95% CI: 0.3-1.4), but it was associated with decreased adenocarcinoma risk (OR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.04-0.8). However, only two adenocarcinomas were HIV-positive among women infected with high-risk HPV types, and therefore this inverse association may be a chance finding. There was no clear association between CD4 count and SCC or adenocarcinoma.

Table 8 Age adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for invasive cervical carcinoma according to HIV serology and CD4 count among women who are infected with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) typesa


The HPV types associated with both SCC and adenocarcinoma risk in our study have also been found to be associated with most ICC in other regions of the world [17, 18].

SCC and HPV infection

Our study shows that SCC in Uganda is strongly associated with any HPV infection and infection with high-risk HPV types, in particular HPV16 (and related types), 18 (and related types) and 45. We found no evidence that adjustment for HIV infection or CD4 decline affect the OR for HPV infections significantly.

As in our present study, several earlier studies found that HPV16 predominated in SCC [19]. Our study showed higher ORs for SCC associated with HPV16 (OR 29.1, 95% CI: 15.4-60.7), which is similar to a study from Taiwan by Chen et al. [20], where HPV16 was associated with an OR of 67. The Taiwanese study found substantial elevated risks for SCC associated with HPV52 (OR 3.04) and HPV58 (OR 5.22), which were not confirmed in our study, while the SCC risk with the other HPV types were low. A study from Mexico also found a high risk of cervical cancer for HPV16 and 18 [1]. The results from Mexico are exceptional in that the OR for HPV18 was higher than that of HPV16. High risks of cervical cancer for HPV18 have also been reported by a number of authors [2123]. Low risks for HPV18 have been found in some studies from India [24, 25].

Adenocarcinomas and HPV infection

For adenocarcinoma, we found an association between any HPV infection, in particular single infections, infections with high-risk HPV types, and most importantly HPV16 (and related types), 18 (and related types) and 45. Adjustment for HIV infection and decline in CD4 count did not alter the associations meaningfully, suggesting that there is only a small confounding effect of HIV and its associated immune deficiency on the risk of HPV in cervical adenocarcinoma.

HPV18 has been reported as the most frequent HPV type found in adenocarcinoma [19]. In a pooled analysis of case-control studies, the relative risk of HPV18 in cervical adenocarcinoma was high (OR 410.32, 95% CI: 167.44-∞) [4]. These results were much higher than ours for HPV18 (OR 18.5, 95% CI: 6.6-54.4).

These differences in findings across different studies may indicate that regional factors, such as differences in the prevalence of different HPV types, may affect ICC risk [26]. These differential risks are probably due to the pathogenesis of the two major types of ICC [27]. Smith et al. [28] and Madeleine et al. [29] noted an elevated risk of SCC associated with Trichomonas vaginalis, but no associated increased risk for adenocarcinoma. Another factor which could in theory explain the differences in SCC and adenocarcinoma risk is smoking [30]; however smoking is not common in Uganda, with a prevalence of only 3% among adult women [31] and 5.3% among adolescent girls [32]. The relatively low relative risk of ICC due to other high-risk HPV types (besides HPV16, 18 and 45) is supported by the low prevalence of these HPV types in ICC in several other studies [3, 33], including a recent study by de Cremoux et al. [34] which found that up to one-third of ICC were not associated with HPV16 or 18. Some of these high-risk HPV types, namely HPV31, 33, 52 and 58, have been found to be more prevalent in high-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions than in SCC [17].

As possible caveats, our study was limited by the number of probes for HPV, which only allowed us to detect 25 HPV genotypes. These are, however, the most important HPV types described in the literature as being associated with cervical lesions including ICC. Moreover, the SPF10-LiPA25 HPV test used in our study (version 1, produced at Labo Biomedical Products, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) is highly sensitive for the HPV types tested. We tested HPV-negative ICC samples for beta-globin, and excluded from all analyses those women whose samples were beta-globin-negative. Thus, the samples included in our analysis were of sufficient quality to allow HPV detection. However, since cases were in general presenting at advanced stages (3 and 4), it is possible that HPV could no longer be detected in the cervical cells of some patients, which may explain why a small proportion of our cases were HPV-negative. This could have somewhat biased the OR for the associations between HPV and ICC towards unity.

HIV and CD4 count

Of particular interest was the lack of clear association between HIV infection and decline in CD4 count on the risk for SCC in our entire study population, and in the subset of women infected with high-risk HPV types. Although there was a non-significant increase in SCC risk associated with HIV infection, it is not probable that this effect was due to immune depression on disease progression, since the OR was not decreased when adjusting for CD4 count.

For adenocarcinomas, there was no evidence of association with HIV infection in the entire study population, regardless of adjustment for different HPV types or groups of types and CD4 count. However, there was an inverse association between HIV infection and adenocarcinoma risk when restricting the analysis to women who were infected with high-risk HPV types. There was no association between CD4 count and adenocarcinoma risk when analysing all women in our study, or when restricting the analyses to the subset of women infected with high-risk HPV types. These finding must be interpreted with caution, as the number of HIV-positive women in our study, in particular among adenocarcinoma cases, was small, and therefore we cannot rule out the possibility of a chance finding.

The overall HPV prevalence among HIV-positive control women was higher than among HIV-negative control women. This may be explained by common sexual transmission routes, or it may be a reflection of the HIV-associated decrease in immune response, which increases the probability of being infected with HPV, and of clearing the infection less effectively than women who are not infected with HIV. As a consequence, the association between HPV infection and ICC among HIV-positive women was in general weaker than among HIV-negative women.

Several previous studies have shown varying risk of ICC in association with HIV infection [12, 3541]. Earlier studies suggested that a possible increase in cervical cancer risk among HIV-positive women could be attributed to the increased prevalence of HPV infection, or persistence of HPV infection [42, 43]. In addition, CIN is less likely to regress, and therefore the probability of CIN progressing to ICC is increased in HIV-infected women [43]. This has been attributed to reduced HLA class II molecules and the presence of immature Langerhans cells within the cervical tissue in HIV-infected women [44]. Other studies have suggested that HPV types other than 16 or 18 are more prevalent in HIV-positive women [19, 45], and that the median duration of infections with different individual HPV types lasts longer in HIV-positive women as compared to HIV-negative women, with the exception of HPV16, which seem to be similar [46, 47]. This indicates that the probability of progression of cervical pre-invasive lesions to invasive lesions may be increased among HIV-positive women.

In our case-control study design, cases were recruited when ICC was already present, and exposures were measured at the time subjects were recruited into the study. Thus, we do not know if HIV infection, or if decrease in CD4 count, occurred before or after the onset of HPV infection or cervical lesions. It is possible that some HIV infections occurred before the onset of HPV infections and before the development cervical pre-invasive or invasive lesions. HIV infection could also have occurred while women were infected with HPV, thus eventually decreasing their capacity to clear the infection. It is also plausible that HIV infections may have occurred too late in life to have any effect on the occurrence or persistence of HPV infection, as suggested by a study from Nairobi, Kenya [48].

The lack of association between HIV infection, CD4 count and SCC risk in our study could also be explained by the fact that progression of CIN to ICC is multifactorial, and not dependent on immune status only [49], by the existence of slow progressors [50, 51] or elite controllers [52, 53] in some women, or by the possibility that HIV and CD4 count have no role in the progression of cervical cancer.

Our study had a number of advantages compared to previous studies. We enrolled all consecutive patients suspected to have ICC, aiming to reduce bias that could occur if any criteria associated with the exposure were used to select ICC cases, for example stage, duration of symptoms, tribe, etc. While other studies have used women with other disease conditions as controls [11, 12], we were able to use women who were not hospitalised, had no cervical disease (CIN cases were excluded), and were living in the same geographical areas as ICC cases. Further, they were representative of the population base from where the cases arose. Since the evaluation of family history of cervical cancer was not part of our study hypothesis, the inclusion of blood relatives of the ICC cases as controls did not constitute a problem.

Another strength was that we carried out the study in an area where both HIV prevalence [14] and cervical cancer incidence are high [13]. This allowed us to adjust for HIV status and decline in CD4 count in our HPV analysis, as well as to perform stratified analyses by HIV status to assess the impact of HIV infection per se and the HPV risk associated with HIV status on ICC.

Our study had a relatively small number of HIV-positive SCC and, in particular, adenocarcinoma. In addition, assessment of immunity was based only on CD4 count, which may reflect HIV infection on the systemic immune system. Although CD4 count has been used before [54], it is difficult to know when immunodeficiency sets in. The statistical power for detecting cancer risk in subgroups of HIV-infected women was limited, in particular for adenocarcinoma.


In conclusion, the OR for SCC and adenocarcinoma of the cervix in Uganda were increased in women infected with HPV, in particular single HPV infections, infections with HPV16- and 18-related types and infections with high-risk HPV types, specifically with HPV16, 18 and 45. HIV infection and CD4 count were not clearly associated with SCC or adenocarcinoma in our entire study population. Among women infected with high-risk HPV types, there was no association between SCC, HIV and CD4 count, while there was an inverse association between HIV infection - but not CD4 count - and adenocarcinoma.



acquired immune deficiency syndrome


automated instrument for monitoring of HIV/AIDS


cluster of differentiation 4, glycoprotein, in humans encoded by the CD4 gene


confidence intervals


cervical intraepithelial neoplasia


DDL Diagnostic Laboratory


DNA enzyme immunoassay


deoxyribonucleic acid


human immunodeficiency virus


human papillomavirus


invasive cervical carcinoma


odds ratio


polymerase chain reaction


squamous cell carcinoma. SPF10-LiPA25: system for HPV genotyping


  1. 1.

    Illades-Aguiar B, Cortes-Malagon EM, Antonio-Vejar V, Zamudio-Lopez N, Alarcon-Romero LC, Fernandez-Tilapa G, Hernandez-Sotelo D, Teran-Porcayo MA, Flores-Alfaro E, Leyva-Vazquez MA: Cervical carcinoma in Southern Mexico: Human papillomavirus and cofactors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2009, 32: 300-307. 10.1016/j.cdp.2008.09.001.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Busnach G, Piselli P, Arbustini E, Baccarani U, Burra P, Carrieri MP, Citterio F, De Juli E, Bellelli S, Pradier C, Rezza G, Serraino D, Immunosuppression and Cancer Study Group: Immunosuppression and cancer: A comparison of risks in recipients of organ transplants and in HIV-positive individuals. Transplant Proc. 2006, 38: 3533-3535. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.144.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bosch FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, Schiffman MH, Moreno V, Kurman R, Shah KV: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995, 87: 796-802. 10.1093/jnci/87.11.796.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Castellsague X, Diaz M, de Sanjosé S, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Peeling RW, Ashley R, Smith JS, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, Bosch FX, International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group: Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 303-315. 10.1093/jnci/djj067.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Arniani S, Lo RA, Barchielli A, Milandri C, Simonato L, Vercelli M, Zanetti R, Rezza G: Linkage of AIDS and cancer registries in Italy. Int J Cancer. 1998, 75: 831-834. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980316)75:6<831::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-W.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Frisch M, Biggar RJ, Goedert JJ: Human papillomavirus-associated cancers in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 1500-1510. 10.1093/jnci/92.18.1500.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schmauz R, Okong P, de Villiers EM, Dennin R, Brade L, Lwanga SK, Owor R: Multiple infections in cases of cervical cancer from a high-incidence area in tropical Africa. Int J Cancer. 1989, 43: 805-809. 10.1002/ijc.2910430511.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    ter Meulen J, Eberhardt HC, Luande J, Mgaya HN, Chang-Claude J, Mtiro H, Mhina M, Kashaija P, Ockert S, Yu X, Meinhardt G, Gissmannl L, Pawlita M: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, HIV infection and cervical cancer in Tanzania, east Africa. Int J Cancer. 1992, 51: 515-521. 10.1002/ijc.2910510403.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dal Maso L, Serraino D, Franceschi S: Epidemiology of AIDS-related tumours in developed and developing countries. Eur J Cancer. 2001, 37: 1188-1201. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00120-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Franceschi S, Dal Maso L, Pezzotti P, Polesel J, Braga C, Piselli P, Serraino D, Tagliabue G, Federico M, Ferretti S, De Lisi V, La Rosa F, Conti E, Budroni M, Vicario G, Piffer S, Pannelli F, Giacomin A, Bellù F, Tumino R, Fusco M, Rezza G, Cancer and AIDS Registry Linkage Study: Incidence of AIDS-defining cancers after AIDS diagnosis among people with AIDS in Italy, 1986-1998. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003, 34: 84-90. 10.1097/00126334-200309010-00013.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sekirime WK, Gray R: HIV infection among Uganda women with cervical cancer: a retrospective study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007, 63: 222-228. 10.1159/000098197.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kahesa C, Mwaiselage J, Wabinga HR, Ngoma T, Kalyango JN, Karamagi CA: Association between invasive cancer of the cervix and HIV-1 infection in Tanzania: the need for dual screening. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 262-10.1186/1471-2458-8-262.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Parkin DM, Nambooze S, Wabwire-Mangen F, Wabinga HR: Changing cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda, 1991-2006. Int J Cancer. 2010, 126: 1187-1195.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Baryarama F, Bunnell RE, Montana L, Hladik W, Opio A, Musinguzi J, Kirungi W, Waswa-Bright L, Mermin JH: HIV prevalence in voluntary counseling and testing centers compared with national HIV serosurvey data in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008, 49: 183-189. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31818455b8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Downing RG, Otten RA, Marum E, Biryahwaho B, Alwano-Edyegu MG, Sempala SD, Fridlund CA, Dondero TJ, Campbell C, Rayfield MA: Optimizing the delivery of HIV counseling and testing services: the Uganda experience using rapid HIV antibody test algorithms. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998, 18: 384-388. 10.1097/00042560-199808010-00011.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Firth D: Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993, 80: 27-38. 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Clifford GM, Smith JS, Aguado T, Franceschi S: Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 101-105. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601024.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, Keys J, Franceschi S, Winer R, Clifford GM: Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 621-632. 10.1002/ijc.22527.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Clifford GM, Goncalves MA, Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types among women infected with HIV: a meta-analysis. AIDS. 2006, 20: 2337-2344. 10.1097/01.aids.0000253361.63578.14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen CA, Liu CY, Chou HH, Chou CY, Ho CM, Twu NF, Kan YY, Chuang MH, Chu TY, Hsieh CY: The distribution and differential risks of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical preinvasive lesions: A Taiwan Cooperative Oncologic Group Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006, 16: 1801-1808. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00655.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chaouki N, Bosch FX, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, El Gueddari B, El Ghazi A, Deacon J, Castellsague X, Walboomers JM: The viral origin of cervical cancer in Rabat, Morocco. Int J Cancer. 1998, 75: 546-554. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980209)75:4<546::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-T.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ferrera A, Velema JP, Figueroa M, Bulnes R, Toro LA, Claros JM, De Barahona O, Melchers WJ: Human papillomavirus infection, cervical dysplasia and invasive cervical cancer in Honduras: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1999, 82: 799-803. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990909)82:6<799::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Thomas DB, Qin Q, Kuypers J, Kiviat N, Ashley RL, Koetsawang A, Ray RM, Koetsawang S: Human papillomaviruses and cervical cancer in Bangkok. II. Risk factors for in situ and invasive squamous cell cervical carcinomas. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 153: 732-739. 10.1093/aje/153.8.732.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Franceschi S, Rajkumar T, Vaccarella S, Gajalakshmi V, Sharmila A, Snijders PJ, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Herrero R: Human papillomavirus and risk factors for cervical cancer in Chennai, India: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2003, 107: 127-133. 10.1002/ijc.11350.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sowjanya AP, Jain M, Poli UR, Padma S, Das M, Shah KV, Rao BN, Devi RR, Gravitt PE, Ramakrishna G: Prevalence and distribution of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) types in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and in normal women in Andhra Pradesh, India. BMC Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 116-10.1186/1471-2334-5-116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bulk S, Berkhof J, Bulkmans NW, Zielinski GD, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ: Preferential risk of HPV16 for squamous cell carcinoma and of HPV18 for adenocarcinoma of the cervix compared to women with normal cytology in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94: 171-175. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602915.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Reimers LL, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Henson DE, Castle PE: Etiologic heterogeneity for cervical carcinoma by histopathologic type, using comparative age-period-cohort models. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18: 792-800. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0965.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smith JS, Bosetti C, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Bosch FX, Eluf-Neto J, Meijer CJ, Van Den Brule AJ, Franceschi S, Peeling RW: Chlamydia trachomatis and invasive cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2004, 111: 431-439. 10.1002/ijc.20257.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Madeleine MM, Anttila T, Schwartz SM, Saikku P, Leinonen M, Carter JJ, Wurscher M, Johnson LG, Galloway DA, Daling JR: Risk of cervical cancer associated with Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies by histology, HPV type and HPV cofactors. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 650-655. 10.1002/ijc.22325.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kapeu AS, Luostarinen T, Jellum E, Dillner J, Hakama M, Koskela P, Lenner P, Love A, Mahlamaki E, Thoresen S, Tryggvadóttir L, Wadell G, Youngman L, Lehtinen M: Is smoking an independent risk factor for invasive cervical cancer? A nested case-control study within Nordic biobanks. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 169: 480-488.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), ORC Macro: Uganda Demographic and Health Survay 2000-2001. 2001, Cleverton, Maryland, USA, UBOS and ORC Macro

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mpabulungi L, Muula AS: Tobacco use among high shool students in Kampala, Uganda: questionnaire study. Croat Med J. 2004, 45: 80-83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pretet JL, Jacquard AC, Carcopino X, Charlot JF, Bouhour D, Kantelip B, Soubeyrand B, Leocmach Y, Mougin C, Riethmuller D: Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in invasive cervical cancers in France: EDITH study. Int J Cancer. 2008, 122: 428-432. 10.1002/ijc.23092.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    de Cremoux P, de la Rochefordière A, Savignoni A, Kirova Y, Alran S, Fourchotte V, Plancher C, Thioux M, Salmon RJ, Cottu P, Mignot L, Sastre-Garau X: Different outcome of invasive cervical cancer associated with high-risk versus intermediate-risk HPV genotype. Int J Cancer. 2009, 124: 778-782. 10.1002/ijc.24075.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cappiello G, Garbuglia AR, Salvi R, Rezza G, Giuliani M, Pezzotti P, Suligoi B, Branca M, Migliore G, Formigoni-Pomponi D, D'Ubaldo C, Ippolito G, Giacomini G, Benedetto A: HIV infection increases the risk of squamous intra-epithelial lesions in women with HPV infection: an analysis of HPV genotypes. DIANAIDS Collaborative Study Group. Int J Cancer. 1997, 72: 982-986. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970917)72:6<982::AID-IJC11>3.0.CO;2-7.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hawes SE, Critchlow CW, Sow PS, Toure P, N'Doye I, Diop A, Kuypers JM, Kasse AA, Kiviat NB: Incident high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in Senegalese women with and without human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 100-109. 10.1093/jnci/djj010.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Massad LS, Seaberg EC, Watts DH, Hessol NA, Melnick S, Bitterman P, Anastos K, Silver S, Levine AM, Minkoff H: Low incidence of invasive cervical cancer among HIV-infected US women in a prevention program. AIDS. 2004, 18: 109-113. 10.1097/00002030-200401020-00013.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Moodley JR, Hoffman M, Carrara H, Allan BR, Cooper DD, Rosenberg L, Denny LE, Shapiro S, Williamson AL: HIV and pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the cervix in South Africa: a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 135-10.1186/1471-2407-6-135.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dal Maso L, Franceschi S, Polesel J, Braga C, Piselli P, Crocetti E, Falcini F, Guzzinati S, Zanetti R, Vercelli M, Rezza G, Cancer and AIDS Registy Linkage Study: Risk of cancer in persons with AIDS in Italy, 1985-1998. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 94-100. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601017.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Engels EA, Biggar RJ, Hall HI, Cross H, Crutchfield A, Finch JL, Grigg R, Hylton T, Pawlish KS, McNeel TS, Goedert JJ: Cancer risk in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 187-194. 10.1002/ijc.23487.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chaturvedi AK, Madeleine MM, Biggar RJ, Engels EA: Risk of human papillomavirus-associated cancers among persons with AIDS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009, 101: 1120-1130. 10.1093/jnci/djp205.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hagensee ME, Cameron JE, Leigh JE, Clark RA: Human papillomavirus infection and disease in HIV-infected individuals. Am J Med Sci. 2004, 328: 57-63. 10.1097/00000441-200407000-00008.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Schuman P, Ohmit SE, Klein RS, Duerr A, Cu-Uvin S, Jamieson DJ, Anderson J, Shah KV: Longitudinal study of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and at-risk HIV-seronegative women. J Infect Dis. 2003, 188: 128-136. 10.1086/375783.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Goncalves MA, Soares EG, Fernandes AP, Fonseca BA, Bettini JS, Simoes RT, Donadi EA: Langerhans' cell count and HLA class II profile in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the presence or absence of HIV infection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004, 114: 221-227. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.10.026.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Didelot-Rousseau MN, Nagot N, Costes-Martineau V, Valles X, Ouedraogo A, Konate I, Weiss HA, Van de Perre P, Mayaud P, Segondy M: Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions among high-risk women with and without HIV-1 infection in Burkina Faso. Br J Cancer. 2006, 95: 355-362. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603252.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Koshiol JE, Schroeder JC, Jamieson DJ, Marshall SW, Duerr A, Heilig CM, Shah KV, Klein RS, Cu-Uvin S, Schuman P, Celentano D, Smith JS: Time to clearance of human papillomavirus infection by type and human immunodeficiency virus serostatus. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 1623-1629. 10.1002/ijc.22015.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Luque AE, Jabeen M, Messing S, Lane CA, Demeter LM, Rose RC, Reichman RC: Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes and related abnormalities of cervical cytological results among HIV-1-infected women in Rochester, New York. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 428-434. 10.1086/505876.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    De Vuyst H, Gichangi P, Estambale B, Njuguna E, Franceschi S, Temmerman M: Human papillomavirus types in women with invasive cervical carcinoma by HIV status in Kenya. Int J Cancer. 2008, 122: 244-246. 10.1002/ijc.23045.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Palefsky J: Biology of HPV in HIV infection. Adv Dent Res. 2006, 19: 99-105. 10.1177/154407370601900120.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bakari M, Urassa W, Mhalu F, Biberfeld G, Pallangyo K, Sandstrom E: Slow progression of HIV-1 infection in a cohort of antiretroviral naive hotel workers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania as defined by their CD4 cell slopes. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008, 40: 407-413. 10.1080/00365540701708285.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Serwanga J, Shafer LA, Pimego E, Auma B, Watera C, Rowland S, Yirrell D, Pala P, Grosskurth H, Whitworth J, Gotch F, Kaleebu P: Host HLA B*allele-associated multi-clade Gag T-cell recognition correlates with slow HIV-1 disease progression in antiretroviral therapy-naive Ugandans. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4188-10.1371/journal.pone.0004188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Baker BM, Block BL, Rothchild AC, Walker BD: Elite control of HIV infection: implications for vaccine design. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009, 9: 55-69. 10.1517/14712590802571928.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dyer WB, Zaunders JJ, Yuan FF, Wang B, Learmont JC, Geczy AF, Saksena NK, McPhee DA, Gorry PR, Sullivan JS: Mechanisms of HIV non-progression; robust and sustained CD4+ T-cell proliferative responses to p24 antigen correlate with control of viraemia and lack of disease progression after long-term transfusion-acquired HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 112-10.1186/1742-4690-5-112.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mangclaviraj S, Kerr SJ, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Ananworanich J, Hirschel B, Emery S, Cooper DA, Chotnopparatpattara P, Ruxrungtham K, Phanuphak P: Nadir CD4 count and monthly income predict cervical squamous cell abnormalities in HIV-positive women in a resource-limited setting. Int J STD AIDS. 2008, 19: 529-532. 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007222.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

Financial support was provided by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). We thank Sarah Nambooze and George Olweny for data entry, Pouran Almstedt for data management, Trudy Perdrix-Thoma for language review and editing of the manuscript, and Margrethe Meo for secretarial assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabete Weiderpass.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MO, FM and EW were responsible for developing the concept, full proposal development and obtaining ethical approvals. MO carried out the field work and was responsible for data collection. BK and WQ made all laboratory analyses and contributed to the interpretation of laboratory results. SS provided statistical analyses and interpretation of the results. MO and EW wrote the manuscript while all other authors; FM, BK, WK and SS gave their critical comments upon the writing process and revised the final manuscript. All authors approved the version to be published.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odida, M., Sandin, S., Mirembe, F. et al. HPV types, HIV and invasive cervical carcinoma risk in Kampala, Uganda: a case-control study. Infect Agents Cancer 6, 8 (2011).

Download citation


  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
  • Control Woman
  • Cervical Cancer Risk