Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Role of BK human polyomavirus in cancer

Infectious Agents and Cancer201813:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-018-0182-9

Received: 1 February 2018

Accepted: 14 March 2018

Published: 5 April 2018

Abstract

Human polyomaviruses (HPyV), which are small DNA viruses classified into the polyomaviridae family, are widely distributed in human populations. Thirteen distinct HPyVs have been described to date. Some of these viruses have been found in human tumors, suggesting an etiological relationship with cancer. In particular, convincing evidence of an oncogenic role has emerged for a specific HPyV, the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). This HPyV has been linked to rare skin cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). This finding may be just the tip of the iceberg, as HPyV infections are ubiquitous in humans. Many authors have conjectured that additional associations between HPyV infections and neoplastic diseases will likely be discovered. In 2012, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated the carcinogenicity of the BK virus (BKPyV), reporting that BKPyV is “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” This review explores the BKPyV infection from a historical point of view, including biological aspects related to viral entry, tropism, epidemiology and mechanisms potentially involved in BKPyV-mediated human carcinogenesis. In order to clarify the role of this virus in human cancer, more epidemiological and basic research is strongly warranted.

Keywords

PolyomavirusCancerOncoprotein

Background

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) are small, non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA viruses with approximately 5000-bp genome and icosahedral symmetry. These viruses belong to the polyomaviridae family. The HPyV genome encodes early small-t/large-T antigens as well as late structural proteins called VP1, VP2, VP3, and agnoprotein. The early region, which is transcribed before DNA replication begins, is composed of large T and small t antigen genes and the splice variants T = 135, T = 136, and T = 165 [1]. The late region is transcribed concomitant with DNA replication. The HPyV capsid harbors 72 pentamers of VP1, which interacts with the VP2/VP3 molecules associated with each pentamer [2]. In addition, these viruses encode a pre-miRNA for generation of two mature miRNAs [3, 4]. A non-coding control region (NCCR) is located between the oppositely-oriented transcriptional units that encode for early and late transcripts. The NCCR contains the promoters and enhancers for regulation of gene expression and harbors the replication origin (Ori) [5]. In BKPyV, JCPyV, and SV40, the agnoprotein is expressed from the 5’region of VP2 open reading frame. It is believed that this protein is involved in various functions related to the HPyV life cycle, such as regulating viral gene expression or inducing viral maturation [6, 7]. A scheme of the BKPyV structure is shown in Fig. 1. The functions of encoded viral products are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Genome map of BKPyV

Table 1

Function of BKPyV gene products

 

BKPyV expression products

Function

Early

Large Tumour Antigen (Tag)

Cell cycle progression, inhibition of apoptosis, viral replication

truncated Large T antigen (truncTAg)

Cell cycle progression, viral replication

Minor T Antigen (tAg)

Cell cycle progression

3p-miRNA

viral persistence

5p-miRNA

viral persistence

Late

VP1

capsid structure (external), viral attachment and entry

VP2

capsid structure (internal), involved in viral infectivity

VP3

capsid structure (internal), involved in viral infectivity

Agno protein

Life cycle (assembly, maturation, release)

In natural hosts, HPyVs establish a productive infection, while in heterologous, non-permissive hosts, the virus establishes latency with potential integration into the host genome (reviewed in [8]). HPyV infection typically occurs early in life, often through fecal-oral transmission, and persists throughout the lifespan [9]. With the development of new high-throughput sequencing techniques, fourteen HPyVs have been described, most of which were discovered in the last few years [10]. As HPyVs are ubiquitous, associations between these viruses and various pathologies are a focus of intensive research, especially the possible contributions of HPyVs to cancer etiology. Four polyomaviruses have been found to show oncogenic potential — SV40, BKPyV, JCPyV, and MCPyV — although there is strong evidence of such a link only in the case of MCPyV. This virus appears to play a role in a rare skin cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma [11]. A carcinogenic role has also been suspected for SV40, but the association remains controversial as no robust evidence has emerged. This virus was initially detected as a contaminant in the poliovirus vaccine, with many infections occurring between 1955 and 1963 [12]. This review evaluates the molecular mechanisms of BKPyV infection and its potential association with cancer.

BK virus

Viral entry

During BKPyV infection, VP1 interacts with the α2, 8-SA-containing b-series gangliosides (GD1b/GT1b) for cell attachment [13]. A crystal-like complex of VP1 and the ganglioside GD3 is formed, with several points of contact between VP1 and two sialic molecules of a disialic acid ganglioside [14]. This model was tested using site-directed mutagenesis. It was concluded that a specific contact between the terminal sialic acid residue of GD3 and VP1 is essential for virus infection. Previous experiments carried out on African green monkey kidney cells suggest that caveolin is involved in BKPyV entry. However, the entry mechanism of BKPyV was recently re-examined in a primary culture of human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells. Using a siRNA strategy, it was demonstrated that BKPyV entry is caveolin- and clathrin-independent [15]. These findings, along with the fact that virus entry does not require actin polymerization, exclude other known alternative endocytic pathways and suggests that BKPyV utilizes an as-yet-uncharacterized endocytic pathway [15, 16]. After entering the cell, the virus must reach the nucleus for replication. This process depends on acidification and maturation of the endosome and involves retrograde transit of endocytic vesicles to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [17, 18]. Once in the ER, partial disassembly occurs. Viral particles escape to the cytoplasm, hijacking ER Derlin family proteins [18]. Finally, the virus enters the nucleus via the importin-α/β pathway, guided by nuclear localization signals present in the minor capsid proteins VP2 and VP3 [19].

Tropism and epidemiology

BKPyV infection is a widely-distributed strict anthroponosis. The primary infection most often occurs in early childhood, with a seroprevalence of 65–90% in 5–9 year-old children [20]. Following primary infection, BKPyV persists in the kidneys. If the host becomes immunosuppressed, the virus causes significant morbidity. For instance, BKPyV causes hemorrhagic cystitis and nephropathy (BKAN) in bone marrow and renal transplant patients, respectively [21, 22]. BKPyV genomes have also been detected in a wide spectrum of normal tissues including liver, stomach, lungs, parathyroid glands, lymph nodes, brain, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, bladder, uterine cervix, vulva, prostate, lips and tongue [23]. Although the transmission mechanism is not completely elucidated, the high resistance of BKPyV to environmental inactivation and its presence at high concentrations in human sewage and other water sources suggest fecal-oral transmission [24]. In this respect, it was reported that salivary glands and oropharyngeal cells are not involved in BKPyV persistence, suggesting that digestive tract would be important for viral transmission [25]. In addition, Taguchi et al. showed a vertical transmission of this virus only in the case of primary BKV infection of serologically negative pregnant women [26]. Moreover, it was reported the presence of BKPyV in 7 out 10 specimens of aborted fetuses suggesting the possibility of transplacental transmission [27]. Once the virus enters to the body, probably peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) transport BKPyV to different sites and organs [28].

Upon BKPyV infection in a permissive host cell, early gene expression leads to DNA replication, followed by late gene expression, production of progeny viral particles and cell death. Permissive cells for viral replication are kidney cells such as Vero (African green monkey kidney) [29], HEK293 (human embryonic kidney cells) [30] or RPTE (primary human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells) [31]. In addition, it has been reported that some salivary glands cells are permissive for BKPyV infection [32].

In a non-permissive cell, BKPyV lytic replication is blocked, and abortive infection may result in oncogenic transformation [33].

Although the oncogenic activity of BKPyV is well-documented in laboratory settings, there is no conclusive evidence of a causal relationship between BKPyV and cancer in human beings. This relationship is difficult to demonstrate in ecological contexts for several reasons: first, the viral agent has a high prevalence in the general population; second, there are a wide range of human tissues in which the virus can be detected; and third, the virus has the ability to remain in a latent state for long periods, with occasional reactivations.

Role in carcinogenesis

The oncogenic properties of BKPyV are well-demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo experimental models. The transforming activity has been mapped in the early region of the BKPyV genome, which encodes two viral oncoproteins: the large T-antigen (TAg) and the small t-antigen (tAg). These viral products induce alterations in the normal cell cycle, ultimately leading to cell immortalization and neoplastic transformation [34]. In one study, transfection of embryonic fibroblasts or cells cultured from kidney or brain tissues of diverse mammalian origin with complete or sub-genomic fragments of BKPyV DNA, containing the early coding region, lead to cell transformation [23]. In addition, transformation with a recombinant construct containing the BKPyV TAg gene and the activated c-Ha-ras oncogene-induced neoplastic transformation at early passages in hamster embryo cells with higher efficiency when compared to independently-transfected genes, suggesting a cooperative effect of the two oncogenes in early carcinogenesis [23]. Moreover, continuous expression of functional TAg is required for the maintenance of BKPyV transformation in hamster and mouse cells [23].

BKPyV large TAg is a highly multifunctional protein that can bind various cellular proteins, altering signaling pathways involved in cell cycle control. The most frequently-studied cellular targets of TAg are the p53 family proteins and pRb tumor suppressor proteins. The interaction between BKPyV TAg and p53 results in the inactivation of this protein, interfering with the response to DNA damage and inducing the unscheduled onset of the S-phase [35]. Therefore, BKPyV TAg drives the cell to override a key cell cycle checkpoint, favoring the accumulation of genetic alterations during each cell replication cycle [23, 36, 37]. In addition, the interaction between BKPyV TAg and pRb leads to the release and nuclear translocation of the E2 factor (E2F) family of transcription factors and subsequent expression of genes, inducing quiescent cells to enter the S-phase [37, 38]. The other early gene product of BKPyV, the small tAg, plays an important role in transformation by inhibiting protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), an essential tumor suppressor in numerous death-signaling pathways. The tAg protein shows two conserved cysteine cluster motifs (CXCXXC) that are thought to be involved in the interaction with PP2A [39]. Indeed, the catalytic (36-kDa) and regulatory (63-kDa) subunits of PP2A have been co-immunoprecipitated with anti-tAg from BKPyV-infected human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells [40]. By inactivating this negative regulator, BKPyV tAg can activate signaling pathways that promote cell proliferation, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [23, 33, 39].

Early reports demonstrated that BKPyV is highly oncogenic in rodents [41, 42]. Assays conducted in newborn hamsters, mice, and rats inoculated with the virus showed that these animals developed tumors at various locations that contained BKPyV DNA sequences, either integrated into the host genome or in a free episomal form with constitutive TAg expression [23]. In addition, animals injected with BKPyV frequently developed ependymomas, pancreatic islet tumors, osteosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, liposarcomas, osteosarcomas, nephroblastomas and gliomas [23]. Transgenic mice expressing the BKPyV early genome region were found to develop highly tissue-specific tumors. Small et al. showed that these animals developed primary hepatocellular carcinomas and renal tumors [43]. Dalrymple and Beemon also observed two types of alterations: enlarged thymuses and renal adenocarcinomas. Moreover, BKPyV TAg expression in these mice was restricted to the epithelial cells of the kidney tumors and enlarged thymuses [44].

Although the transforming ability of BKPyV is well-documented in experimental rodent models, definitive transforming activity is not always observed in human and primates. The transformation of HEK cells by BKPyV is not efficient and is often abortive, and features of the transformed phenotype are not fully displayed [37, 45]. For instance, BKPyV TAg was able to induce serum-independent growth in BSC-1 African green monkey kidney cells but was unable to induce anchorage-independent growth in soft agar [37]. In addition, BKPyV TAg activity is lower in BKPyV-infected BSC cells than the TAg activity expressed by the SV40 virus under the same conditions. TAg expressed by BKPyV is not sufficient to completely capture the Rb family of proteins. It has been proposed that the difference between SV40 and BKPyV TAg activity may be due to lower expression levels of the BKPyV promoter and enhancer elements, which share only 40% homology with the SV40 promoter region. Alternatively, this finding may be a consequence the greater instability of the BKPyV TAg as compared to SV40 TAg protein [37]. These findings suggest that while BKPyV TAg may modulate cellular growth through direct interactions with critical regulatory proteins, additional events are required for complete transformation. These events could be mutations or alterations of the viral promoter-enhancer elements, leading to increased expression of early genes and a consequent increase in transforming activity [46]. In support of this model, integration of early-region viral sequences into the host genome has been shown to account for the difference between serum-independent growth and full transformation in BKPyV-infected human embryonic kidney cells [47]. This integration event could result in positioning of BKPyV TAg coding sequence under the control of nearby cellular promoter-enhancer elements.

An alternative model for the role of BKPyV TAg in oncogenesis involves the first step in which BKPyV TAg binds to or inactivates tumor suppressor proteins, with a second step leading to cellular oncogene activation. This model is supported by studies showing that human embryonic kidney cells persistently infected with BKPyV exhibited a semi-transformed phenotype and that full transformation resulted from the additional presence of activated Ha-ras oncogenes [48]. Therefore, p53 inactivation by BK TAg may lead to random mutational events that could activate cellular oncogenes or inactivate other tumor suppressor genes. Moreover, it has been shown that BKPyV TAg induces chromosomal instability in human embryonic fibroblasts, characterized by gaps, breaks, dicentric and ring chromosomes, deletions, duplications and translocations [49]. Consistent with early participation of BKPyV TAg in tumorigenesis, there is evidence that these alterations occur before immortalization [23]. Once chromosomal alterations are fixed into the host cells, viral sequences may be dispensable for the maintenance of transformation and may be lost in the neoplastic tissues.

Various authors have detected BKPyV genetic material in a wide range of human tumors [23, 33]. For instance, the early BKPyV genome region has been detected in brain tumors, osteosarcomas, Ewing’s tumors, neuroblastomas and genitourinary tract tissues tumors, including prostatic and bladder cancer [23, 33, 50, 51]. In contrast, other authors reported no association between BKPyV DNA and tumors [33, 5256]. In any case, the mere presence of BKPyV DNA does not necessarily reflect a neoplastic involvement of the virus. In some cases, BKPyV may not be directly involved in the development of cancer, but instead, play a role as a co-factor in the carcinogenic process. For instance, the virus may co-infect cells that were previously infected by another oncogenic virus, increasing susceptibility to cancer. In fact, HPyVs have been detected in various tissues that are susceptible to transformation by HTLV-I, HCV, HPV, EBV, HHV-8 and HBV [57]. In addition, recent reports have documented the presence of BKPyV DNA in association with HPV16 in high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions [58]. The association of BKPyV with precancerous cervical lesions suggests that this virus could be involved in HPV16-induced cell transformation. Alternatively, BKPyV might benefit from proliferative enhancement of HPV16-positive cells in precancerous cervical cells. Further experimental studies and clinical observations are needed to verify whether this putative transformation mechanism involving BKPyV and HPV occurs in cervical cancer [58].

Early findings established that BKPyV has a tropism for certain cell types and that this agent can establish a persistent or latent infection in the kidney and urinary tract [59]. Therefore, carcinomas that affect this anatomical zone are likely candidates for associations with BKPyV. Among these diseases, renal cancer, urothelial bladder cancer, and prostatic cancer have been extensively studied [23, 60].

The contribution of BKPyV to the etiology of bladder carcinoma in immunocompetent individuals is not well-established. Some studies demonstrate BKPyV DNA sequences at high frequencies in bladder carcinoma [61, 62]. However, these studies were small case series that either lacked a control group or relied entirely on antibody seroprevalence [63]. In a multi-center study, Polesel et al. found similar a prevalence of the viral DNA in a group of 114 transitional bladder carcinoma cases and a group of 140 hospital controls. This result does not support the role of BKPyV in bladder cancer among immunocompetent individuals [64].

On the other hand, there are reports that link BKPyV with metastatic bladder carcinoma in immunosuppressed transplant recipients [6567]. In a retrospective study, Roberts et al. reported that while no positive BKPyV TAg urothelial carcinomas were found in a series of non-transplanted patients (0/20), strong nuclear staining for TAg was seen in the urothelial carcinoma of one renal transplant patient [68]. This data indicates that although associations between BKPyV and these tumors are rare, the virus may have a tumorigenic role in some cases. In addition, in a retrospective review of kidney transplant patients, Chen et al. reported that 6/864 patients developed polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Malignancy occurred in 5/6 PVAN patients, suggesting that patients who develop PVAN are at significantly higher risk of developing cancers, including transitional cell bladder carcinoma [66, 69]. Although urothelial carcinomas expressing BK TAg are quite rare [68], these cancers show some distinct features. These tumors are high-grade and invasive. Lesions can arise in the renal allograft or the host urothelial tissue. While TAg is strongly expressed in the tumor cells, the late structural proteins are not expressed, and no viral replication is observed. This finding suggests that the possible oncogenic mechanism involves deregulation of the proliferation inducer TAg [70]. Recent findings using deep sequencing analysis from a high-grade BKPyV-associated tumor expressing TAg have revealed viral DNA integrated into the host genome [71, 72]. While the insertion site seems to be nonspecific, the virus genome linearization break-point was situated in the late gene coding region. This interruption accounts for the blockage of viral replication and suggests a concomitant disruption of regulatory feedback signals that control TAg expression [71, 72]. Moreover, Seo et al., (2008) reported that BKPyV codes a pre-miRNA hairpin at the 3′ end of the late region [73]. The maturation of this element gives rise to two miRNAs, 5p-miRNA and 3p-miRNA, which are perfectly complementary to Tag-coding mRNA. Whether these miRNAs are functional during BKPyV infection and how this regulatory disruption contributes to BKPyV-mediated cell transformation is currently under intense study.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in men worldwide, and its relationship with BKPyV infection has been studied by several groups in recent years [7480]. Monini et al. detected BKPyV in approximately 60% of cancerous and healthy prostates, and the viral load was found to be significantly higher in neoplastic as compared to non-neoplastic tissue [74]. Das and Russo found similar detection rates in PCa cases, with a significantly lower prevalence in controls [76, 77, 81]. On the other hand, other authors disagree with these results. Lau et al., using in situ, detected BKPyV in only 2/30 prostatic adenocarcinomas, and no TAg expression was detected in neoplastic tissue [79]. Similarly, Sfanos et al. of 338 analyzed total samples from 200 patients for BKPyV DNA and detected only one positive sample [82]. In Chile, our group found only 6/69 (8.7%) BKPyV DNA-positive prostate carcinomas, and the TAg transcripts were detected in 2/6 (33%) of BKPyV positive cases [83]. These apparently contradictory data can be partially explained due to the variable sensitivity and specificity of the detection methods used in each study. However, this finding may also suggest that the virus is dispensable at late stages of the disease, and it may be cleared from the lesion. In this context, it has been postulated that BKPyV constitutes an important factor for early prostate tumorigenesis [77]. Although p53 and pRb proteins are implicated in PCa, there is a low incidence of mutations in these genes during early stages of the disease [84]. This finding has led to the suggestion that a human oncogenic virus such as BKPyV may be implicated in the inactivation of these tumor suppressor proteins at early stages of tumorigenesis [76, 77]. There is growing evidence supporting this model. Using a combination of Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) and molecular biology techniques, BKPyV DNA has been detected in the epithelial cells of benign and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) and prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), entities that have been postulated to be the early transition step toward overt PCa [76, 77, 85, 86]. In addition, using double immunofluorescence labeling with anti-p53 and TAg antibodies in BKPyV positive prostate tumor tissue sections, it has been observed that the two proteins colocalize in the cytoplasm. While the typical localization of both proteins is nuclear, the cytoplasmic localization suggests a functional inactivation mechanism by sequestration [81]. Moreover, p53 genes from atrophic cells expressing TAg are frequently wild-type, whereas tumor cells expressing detectable nuclear p53 contain a mix of wild-type and mutant p53 genes. This finding suggests a possible tumorigenic mechanism in which the TAg inactivates p53 in the atrophic cells, increasing susceptibility to genetic alterations, including tumor suppressor gene mutations that may result in early prostate cancer progression. This model is consistent with a “hit-and-run” carcinogenesis mechanism [87]. After cell transformation, the loss of BKPyV in the tumor cells could be due to selection against TAg by the immune system, dilution of viral episomes due to lack of replication or pro-apoptotic effects mediated by TAg that are not compatible with the other growth control mutations in the tumor cells, resulting in selection against TAg expression [23, 33, 76, 77, 81]. Nonetheless, the “hit-and-run” mechanism is difficult to defend experimentally. Taken together, a carcinogenic role of this virus has been difficult to demonstrate. Some arguments for a carcinogenic and for a non-carcinogenic role of BKPyV in human cancer are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Evidences for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic role of BKPyV

Evidences of BKPyV carcinogenicity

Evidences for a non-carcinogenic role

Viral oncogenes are expressed in tumors

Poor and not efficient transforming activity in human cells

Tumors developed in in vivo models

Ubiquitous distribution in normal human cells and tissues

Transforming properties in in vitro models

Variable BKPyV presence in tumors among different studies

BKPyV alterations occur before immortalization

BKPyV genome detected in human tumors

Conclusion

The challenge now is to devise investigative strategies that might lead to conclusive evidence that would allow us to confirm or exclude the role of BKPyV in the development of tumors. Thus, more epidemiological and experimental studies are strongly required. In addition, the possibility of interaction with other host-related factors, infectious agents or environmental components for carcinogenesis warrants more investigation.

Abbreviations

BKPyV: 

BK polyomavirus

HPyV: 

Human polyomavirus

PCa: 

Prostate cancer

SV40: 

Simian Virus 40

TAg: 

Major T antigen

tAg: 

Minor T antigen

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by FONDECYT Grant 1161219 (FA), FONDECYT Grant 1151250 (OL), FONDECYT Grant 11121411 (MA), U-INICIA Grant 11/08 (MA), Fundación Estudios Biomédicos Avanzados, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and CONICYT-FONDAP Grant 15130011 (FA).

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials are available in the main manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

JL, AG, FA: Conceived and designed the manuscript. JL and FA Wrote the manuscript. JL, AG, OL and MA contributed with reading, comments, writing and criticisms. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
(2)
Departamento de Oncología Básico clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
(3)
Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

References

  1. Trowbridge PW, Frisque RJ. Identification of three new JC virus proteins generated by alternative splicing of the early viral mRNA. J Neuro-Oncol. 1995;1(2):195–206.Google Scholar
  2. Barouch DH, Harrison SC. Interactions among the major and minor coat proteins of polyomavirus. J Virol. 1994;68(6):3982–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Lagatie O, Tritsmans L, Stuyver LJ. The miRNA world of polyomaviruses. Virol J. 2013;10:268.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee S, Paulson KG, Murchison EP, Afanasiev OK, Alkan C, Leonard JH, Byrd DR, Hannon GJ, Nghiem P. Identification and validation of a novel mature microRNA encoded by the Merkel cell polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinomas. J Clin Virol. 2011;52(3):272–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethge T, Hachemi HA, Manzetti J, Gosert R, Schaffner W, Hirsch HH. Sp1 sites in the noncoding control region of BK polyomavirus are key regulators of bidirectional viral early and late gene expression. J Virol. 2015;89(6):3396–411.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sariyer IK, Saribas AS, White MK, Safak M. Infection by agnoprotein-negative mutants of polyomavirus JC and SV40 results in the release of virions that are mostly deficient in DNA content. Virol J. 2011;8:255.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Khalili K, White MK, Sawa H, Nagashima K, Safak M. The agnoprotein of polyomaviruses: a multifunctional auxiliary protein. J Cell Physiol. 2005;204(1):1–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Flippot R, Malouf GG, Su X, Khayat D, Spano JP. Oncogenic viruses: lessons learned using next-generation sequencing technologies. Eur J Cancer. 2016;61:61–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Martel-Jantin C, Pedergnana V, Nicol JT, Leblond V, Trégouët DA, Tortevoye P, Plancoulaine S, Coursaget P, Touzé A, Abel L, et al. Merkel cell polyomavirus infection occurs during early childhood and is transmitted between siblings. J Clin Virol. 2013;58(1):288–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gheit T, Dutta S, Oliver J, Robitaille A, Hampras S, Combes JD, McKay-Chopin S, Le Calvez-Kelm F, Fenske N, Cherpelis B, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel putative human polyomavirus. Virology. 2017;506:45–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science. 2008;319(5866):1096–100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dang-Tan T, Mahmud SM, Puntoni R, Franco EL. Polio vaccines, simian virus 40, and human cancer: the epidemiologic evidence for a causal association. Oncogene. 2004;23(38):6535–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Low JA, Magnuson B, Tsai B, Imperiale MJ. Identification of gangliosides GD1b and GT1b as receptors for BK virus. J Virol. 2006;80(3):1361–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Neu U, Khan ZM, Schuch B, Palma AS, Liu Y, Pawlita M, Feizi T, Stehle T. Structures of B-lymphotropic polyomavirus VP1 in complex with oligosaccharide ligands. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(10):e1003714.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao L, Marciano AT, Rivet CR, Imperiale MJ. Caveolin- and clathrin-independent entry of BKPyV into primary human proximal tubule epithelial cells. Virology. 2016;492:66–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Eash S, Atwood WJ. Involvement of cytoskeletal components in BK virus infectious entry. J Virol. 2005;79(18):11734–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Maru S, Jin G, Desai D, Amin S, Shwetank, Lauver MD, Lukacher AE. Inhibition of retrograde transport limits Polyomavirus infection in vivo. mSphere. 2017;2(6)Google Scholar
  18. Jiang M, Abend JR, Tsai B, Imperiale MJ. Early events during BK virus entry and disassembly. J Virol. 2009;83(3):1350–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bennett SM, Zhao L, Bosard C, Imperiale MJ. Role of a nuclear localization signal on the minor capsid proteins VP2 and VP3 in BKPyV nuclear entry. Virology. 2015;474:110–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Siguier M, Sellier P, Bergmann JF. BK-virus infections: a literature review. Med Mal Infect. 2012;42(5):181–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsch HH, Brennan DC, Drachenberg CB, Ginevri F, Gordon J, Limaye AP, Mihatsch MJ, Nickeleit V, Ramos E, Randhawa P, et al. Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations. Transplantation. 2005;79(10):1277–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirsch HH, Randhawa P, Practice AIDCo. BK virus in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(Suppl 4):S136–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tognon M, Corallini A, Martini F, Negrini M, Barbanti-Brodano G. Oncogenic transformation by BK virus and association with human tumors. Oncogene. 2003;22(33):5192–200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bofill-Mas S, Pina S, Girones R. Documenting the epidemiologic patterns of polyomaviruses in human populations by studying their presence in urban sewage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(1):238–45.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundsfjord A, Spein AR, Lucht E, Flaegstad T, Seternes OM, Traavik T. Detection of BK virus DNA in nasopharyngeal aspirates from children with respiratory infections but not in saliva from immunodeficient and immunocompetent adult patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(5):1390–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Taguchi F, Kajioka J, Shimada N. Presence of interferon and antibodies to BK virus in amniotic fluid of normal pregnant women. Acta Virol. 1985;29(4):299–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Boldorini R, Allegrini S, Miglio U, Nestasio I, Paganotti A, Veggiani C, Monga G, Pietropaolo V. BK virus sequences in specimens from aborted fetuses. J Med Virol. 2010;82(12):2127–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Chatterjee M, Weyandt TB, Frisque RJ. Identification of archetype and rearranged forms of BK virus in leukocytes from healthy individuals. J Med Virol. 2000;60(3):353–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardner SD, Field AM, Coleman DV, Hulme B. New human papovavirus (B.K.) isolated from urine after renal transplantation. Lancet. 1971;1(7712):1253–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall WF, Telenti A, Proper J, Aksamit AJ, Smith TF. Rapid detection of polyomavirus BK by a shell vial cell culture assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28(7):1613–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Low J, Humes HD, Szczypka M, Imperiale M. BKV and SV40 infection of human kidney tubular epithelial cells in vitro. Virology. 2004;323(2):182–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeffers LK, Madden V, Webster-Cyriaque J. BK virus has tropism for human salivary gland cells in vitro: implications for transmission. Virology. 2009;394(2):183–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Abend JR, Jiang M, Imperiale MJ. BK virus and human cancer: innocent until proven guilty. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19(4):252–60.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Imperiale MJ. The human polyomaviruses, BKV and JCV: molecular pathogenesis of acute disease and potential role in cancer. Virology. 2000;267(1):1–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa P, Rinaldo CH, Drachenberg CB, Alexiev B, Hirsch HH. BK Polyomavirus infection and Renourinary tumorigenesis. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(2):398–406.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shivakumar CV, Das GC. Interaction of human polyomavirus BK with the tumor-suppressor protein p53. Oncogene. 1996;13(2):323–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris KF, Christensen JB, Imperiale MJ. BK virus large T antigen: interactions with the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressor proteins and effects on cellular growth control. J Virol. 1996;70(4):2378–86.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris KF, Chang E, Christensen JB, Imperiale MJ. BK virus as a potential co-factor in human cancer. Dev Biol Stand. 1998;94:81–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. White MK, Khalili K. Polyomaviruses and human cancer: molecular mechanisms underlying patterns of tumorigenesis. Virology. 2004;324(1):1–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rundell K, Major EO, Lampert M. Association of cellular 56,000- and 32,000-molecular-weight protein with BK virus and polyoma virus t-antigens. J Virol. 1981;37(3):1090–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Corallini A, Pagnani M, Viadana P, Camellin P, Caputo A, Reschiglian P, Rossi S, Altavilla G, Selvatici R, Barbanti-Brodano G. Induction of malignant subcutaneous sarcomas in hamsters by a recombinant DNA containing BK virus early region and the activated human c-Harvey-ras oncogene. Cancer Res. 1987;47(24 Pt 1):6671–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Noss G, Stauch G, Mehraein P, Georgii A. Oncogenic activity of the BK type of human papova virus in newborn Wistar rats. Arch Virol. 1981;69(3–4):239–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Small JA, Khoury G, Jay G, Howley PM, Scangos GA. Early regions of JC virus and BK virus induce distinct and tissue-specific tumors in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(21):8288–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Dalrymple SA, Beemon KL. BK virus T antigens induce kidney carcinomas and thymoproliferative disorders in transgenic mice. J Virol. 1990;64(3):1182–91.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Portolani M, Borgatti M. Stable transformation of mouse, rabbit and monkey cells and abortive transformation of human cells by BK virus, a human papovavirus. J Gen Virol. 1978;38(2):369–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Watanabe S, Yoshiike K. Decreasing the number of 68-base-pair tandem repeats in the BK virus transcriptional control region reduces plaque size and enhances transforming capacity. J Virol. 1985;55(3):823–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Purchio AF, Fareed GC. Transformation of human embryonic kidney cells by human papovarirus BK. J Virol. 1979;29(2):763–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Pater A, Pater MM. Transformation of primary human embryonic kidney cells to anchorage independence by a combination of BK virus DNA and the Harvey-ras oncogene. J Virol. 1986;58(2):680–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Trabanelli C, Corallini A, Gruppioni R, Sensi A, Bonfatti A, Campioni D, Merlin M, Calza N, Possati L, Barbanti-Brodano G. Chromosomal aberrations induced by BK virus T antigen in human fibroblasts. Virology. 1998;243(2):492–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. De Mattei M, Martini F, Corallini A, Gerosa M, Scotlandi K, Carinci P, Barbanti-Brodano G, Tognon M. High incidence of BK virus large-T-antigen-coding sequences in normal human tissues and tumors of different histotypes. Int J Cancer. 1995;61(6):756–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Flaegstad T, Andresen PA, Johnsen JI, Asomani SK, Jørgensen GE, Vignarajan S, Kjuul A, Kogner P, Traavik T. A possible contributory role of BK virus infection in neuroblastoma development. Cancer Res. 1999;59(5):1160–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Arthur RR, Grossman SA, Ronnett BM, Bigner SH, Vogelstein B, Shah KV. Lack of association of human polyomaviruses with human brain tumors. J Neuro-Oncol. 1994;20(1):55–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Weggen S, Bayer TA, von Deimling A, Reifenberger G, von Schweinitz D, Wiestler OD, Pietsch T. Low frequency of SV40, JC and BK polyomavirus sequences in human medulloblastomas, meningiomas and ependymomas. Brain Pathol. 2000;10(1):85–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Greenlee JE, Becker LE, Narayan O, Johnson RT. Failure to demonstrate papovavirus tumor antigen in human cerebral neoplasms. Ann Neurol. 1978;3(6):479–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Rollison DE, Utaipat U, Ryschkewitsch C, Hou J, Goldthwaite P, Daniel R, Helzlsouer KJ, Burger PC, Shah KV, Major EO. Investigation of human brain tumors for the presence of polyomavirus genome sequences by two independent laboratories. Int J Cancer. 2005;113(5):769–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Grossi MP, Meneguzzi G, Chenciner N, Corallini A, Poli F, Altavilla G, Alberti S, Milanesi G, Barbanti-Brodano G. Lack of association between BK virus and ependymomas, malignant tumors of pancreatic islets, osteosarcomas and other human tumors. Intervirology. 1981;15(1):10–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Moens U, Van Ghelue M, Ehlers B. Are human polyomaviruses co-factors for cancers induced by other oncoviruses? Rev Med Virol. 2014;24(5):343–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Comar M, Bonifacio D, Zanconati F, Di Napoli M, Isidoro E, Martini F, Torelli L, Tognon M. High prevalence of BK polyomavirus sequences in human papillomavirus-16-positive precancerous cervical lesions. J Med Virol. 2011;83(10):1770–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Chesters PM, Heritage J, McCance DJ. Persistence of DNA sequences of BK virus and JC virus in normal human tissues and in diseased tissues. J Infect Dis. 1983;147(4):676–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Abend JR, Joseph AE, Das D, Campbell-Cecen DB, Imperiale MJ. A truncated T antigen expressed from an alternatively spliced BK virus early mRNA. J Gen Virol. 2009;90(Pt 5):1238–45.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Monini P, de Lellis L, Rotola A, Di Luca D, Ravaioli T, Bigoni B, Cassai E. Chimeric BK virus DNA episomes in a papillary urothelial bladder carcinoma. Intervirology. 1995;38(5):304–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Fioriti D, Pietropaolo V, Dal Forno S, Laurenti C, Chiarini F, Degener AM. Urothelial bladder carcinoma and viral infections: different association with human polyomaviruses and papillomaviruses. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2003;16(3):283–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Newton R, Ribeiro T, Casabonne D, Alvarez E, Touzé A, Key T, Coursaget P. Antibody levels against BK virus and prostate, kidney and bladder cancers in the EPIC-Oxford cohort. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(11):1305–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Polesel J, Gheit T, Talamini R, Shahzad N, Lenardon O, Sylla B, La Vecchia C, Serraino D, Tommasino M, Franceschi S. Urinary human polyomavirus and papillomavirus infection and bladder cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(1):222–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Geetha D, Tong BC, Racusen L, Markowitz JS, Westra WH. Bladder carcinoma in a transplant recipient: evidence to implicate the BK human polyomavirus as a causal transforming agent. Transplantation. 2002;73(12):1933–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Chen CH, Wen MC, Wang M, Lian JD, Cheng CH, Wu MJ, Yu TM, Chuang YW, Chang D, Shu KH. High incidence of malignancy in polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(3):817–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Pino L, Rijo E, Nohales G, Frances A, Ubre A, Arango O. Bladder transitional cell carcinoma and BK virus in a young kidney transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(1):E25–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Roberts IS, Besarani D, Mason P, Turner G, Friend PJ, Newton R. Polyoma virus infection and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder following renal transplantation. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(9):1383–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Gupta G, Kuppachi S, Kalil RS, Buck CB, Lynch CF, Engels EA. Treatment for presumed BK polyomavirus nephropathy and risk of urinary tract cancers among kidney transplant recipients in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(1):245–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Müller DC, Rämö M, Naegele K, Ribi S, Wetterauer C, Perrina V, Quagliata L, Vlajnic T, Ruiz C, Balitzki B, et al. Donor-derived, metastatic urothelial cancer after kidney-transplantation associated with a potentially oncogenic BK polyomavirus. J Pathol; 2017;244(3):265–70.Google Scholar
  71. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Burger-Calderon R, Singh HK, Nickeleit V. The oncogenic potential of BK-polyomavirus is linked to viral integration into the human genome. J Pathol. 2015;237(3):379–89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Latulippe E, Côté I, Singh HK, Nickeleit V. BK Polyomavirus genomic integration and large T antigen expression: evolving paradigms in human Oncogenesis. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(6):1674–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Seo GJ, Fink LH, O'Hara B, Atwood WJ, Sullivan CS. Evolutionarily conserved function of a viral microRNA. J Virol. 2008;82(20):9823–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Monini P, Rotola A, Di Luca D, De Lellis L, Chiari E, Corallini A, Cassai E. DNA rearrangements impairing BK virus productive infection in urinary tract tumors. Virology. 1995;214(1):273–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Balis V, Sourvinos G, Soulitzis N, Giannikaki E, Sofras F, Spandidos DA. Prevalence of BK virus and human papillomavirus in human prostate cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2007;22(4):245–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Das D, Shah RB, Imperiale MJ. Detection and expression of human BK virus sequences in neoplastic prostate tissues. Oncogene. 2004;23(42):7031–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Das D, Wojno K, Imperiale MJ. BK virus as a cofactor in the etiology of prostate cancer in its early stages. J Virol. 2008;82(6):2705–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Fioriti D, Russo G, Mischitelli M, Anzivino E, Bellizzi A, Di Monaco F, Di Silverio F, Giordano A, Chiarini F, Pietropaolo V. A case of human polyomavirus Bk infection in a patient affected by late stage prostate cancer: could viral infection be correlated with cancer progression? Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007;20(2):405–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Lau SK, Lacey SF, Chen YY, Chen WG, Weiss LM. Low frequency of BK virus in prostatic adenocarcinomas. APMIS. 2007;115(6):743–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Zambrano A, Kalantari M, Simoneau A, Jensen JL, Villarreal LP. Detection of human polyomaviruses and papillomaviruses in prostatic tissue reveals the prostate as a habitat for multiple viral infections. Prostate. 2002;53(4):263–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Russo G, Anzivino E, Fioriti D, Mischitelli M, Bellizzi A, Giordano A, Autran-Gomez A, Di Monaco F, Di Silverio F, Sale P, et al. p53 gene mutational rate, Gleason score, and BK virus infection in prostate adenocarcinoma: is there a correlation? J Med Virol. 2008;80(12):2100–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Sfanos KS, Sauvageot J, Fedor HL, Dick JD, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB. A molecular analysis of prokaryotic and viral DNA sequences in prostate tissue from patients with prostate cancer indicates the presence of multiple and diverse microorganisms. Prostate. 2008;68(3):306–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Rodriguez H, Levican J, Munoz JP, Carrillo D, Acevedo ML, Gaggero A, Leon O, Gheit T, Espinoza-Navarro O, Castillo J, et al. Viral infections in prostate carcinomas in Chilean patients. Infect Agents Cancer. 2015;10:27. https://infectagentscancer.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13027-015-0024-y?site=infectagentscancer.biomedcentral.com.
  84. Dong JT. Prevalent mutations in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2006;97(3):433–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. De Marzo AM, Meeker AK, Zha S, Luo J, Nakayama M, Platz EA, Isaacs WB, Nelson WG. Human prostate cancer precursors and pathobiology. Urology. 2003;62(5 Suppl 1):55–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Delbue S, Matei DV, Carloni C, Pecchenini V, Carluccio S, Villani S, Tringali V, Brescia A, Ferrante P. Evidence supporting the association of polyomavirus BK genome with prostate cancer. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2013;202(6):425–30.Google Scholar
  87. Ambinder RF. Gammaherpesviruses and "hit-and-run" oncogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(1):1–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement