Open Access

Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in cervical intraepithelial lesions and the status of cytological p16/Ki-67 dual-staining

Infectious Agents and Cancer201712:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-016-0111-8

Received: 14 August 2016

Accepted: 13 December 2016

Published: 6 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is not a disease subject to mandatory reporting in Brazil, and the prevalence rate of this genital infection varies according to the region in which studies are conducted, as well as by the detection technique employed. Ct has been associated with persistence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the facilitation of cervical carcinoma development. We evaluated the Chlamydia trachomatis infection and its association with cytology, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology and cervical intraepithelial lesions status in a screening cohort in Brazil.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 1481 cervical samples from asymptomatic women aged 18 to 64. Samples were collected for liquid-based cytology and Ct detection by polymerase chain reaction. p16/Ki-67 double staining was performed on samples with abnormal cytology. Statistical analysis was by chi-square and likelihood-ratio tests. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined.

Results

The frequency of Ct was 15.6% and its presence was not associated with detection of p16/Ki-67 [OR = 1.35 (0.5–3.4)]. There was also no association between abnormal cervical cytology and Ct-positivity [OR = 1.21 (0.46–3.2)]. Associations were observed between p16/Ki-67 and high-grade lesions detected by cytology and in biopsies [OR = 3.55 (1.50–8.42) and OR = 19.00 (0.6–7.2), respectively].

Conclusions

The asymptomatic women in our study had a high frequency of Ct infection but this was not associated with p16/Ki-67 detection in samples with abnormal cytology. The expression of p16/Ki-67 was highest in women with high-grade CIN (p = 0.003).

Keywords

Chlamydia Cervical cancerImmunocytochemistryki 67

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is not a disease subject to mandatory reporting in Brazil, and the prevalence rate of this genital infection varies according to the region in which studies are conducted, as well as by the detection technique employed [14]. Ct has been associated with persistence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the facilitation of cervical carcinoma development. It has also been hypothesized that Ct may promote HPV access and entry in to the basal layer of the epithelium by inducing chronic inflammation, cervical hypertrophy and metaplasia. Metaplasia is a preferred HPV target [5]. and these biological effects increase the risk of cervical cell transformation and the persistence of infection by oncogenic HPV types. A concomitant Ct and HPV infection is hypothesized to increase the expression of Ki-67 (a marker for proliferation of the cervical epithelium) by HPV-generated mitogenic actions and by the anti-apoptotic activity elicited by both infectious agents [5]. Ct may also increase protein expression of oncogenic HPV16 in low-grade lesions [5].

Cervical cancer screening via cytology may reduce mortality by up to 50% under appropriate conditions and when solid population coverage is implemented; however, the sensitivity of cytology to detect CIN or invasive cancer may be <60% [6].

An increased understanding of how HPV contributes to cervical cell neoplastic transformation led to the routine use of biomarkers, such as p16, to identify HPV-mediated transformation. Studies have suggested that analysis for the p16 biomarker by cytology and histology in cervical lesions may have clinical utility by optimizing the efficiency of cytological tests [7]. Such findings have ensured greater efficiency in the early detection of cervical cancer. However, since some normal cervical cells may express p16, it is necessary to conduct additional morphologic evaluations. A recently developed p16 and Ki-67 detection kit enables the recognition of abnormal cells based on the double staining of both markers in the same cell, thereby possibly reducing the need for morphologic interpretation [7].

Recent publications claims that p16/Ki-67 detect oncogenic molecular changes induced by a persistent HPV infection in the cell through detection of concordant expression of the tumors suppressor protein p16 (also cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) and the proliferation marker Ki-67 in the same cell, which are mutually exclusive in cells with a normal cell cycle. Since the latter cells are consistently cell cycle arrested, the combination of antibodies detecting p16INK4a and the cell cycle progression marker Ki-67 in one cell allows for the unequivocal identification of truly HPV-transformed cervical cells [8, 9].

The present study was conducted to analyze Chlamydia trachomatis infection and its status with cytology, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology and CIN status in a screening cohort in Brazil.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 1481 cervical samples preserved in liquid media, collected from asymptomatic women aged 18 to 64 and enrolled in a cervical cancer screening project in one clinical center (Leonor Mendes de Barros Hospital) in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pregnant or hysterectomized women or women being treated for cervical neoplasia were excluded from the study. All women included in the study filled out a questionnaire on risk factors for cervical cancer. Cervical samples were collected at the ectocervix/endocervical junction with a Rover’s Cervex-Brush and the material was placed in the liquid preservative medium (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Description of Biopsies According to Presence of Chlamydia trachomatis. Flowchart for the tests performed. CIN cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Ct Chlamydia trachomatis

Cytology slides preparation

The entire brush head was introduced into the tube containing the BD SurePath™ liquid (BD Diagnostics – TriPath, Burlington, NC, USA), and sent to laboratory. The slides were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using BD PrepMate™ and BD PrepStain™. All liquid-based preparations were performed with a semi-automated methodology, according to the manufacturer’s instructions and manually analyzed.

Cytological changes were classified according to the 2014 Bethesda System [10] A colposcopy examination was requested for women with cytological abnormalities equal to or worse than Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS).

Chlamydia trachomatis detection

One thousand four hundred eighty one samples were collected for Ct detection in the BD cytology residual medium with the BD ProbeTec Amplified DNA Test, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunocytochemistry of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining

The CINtec PLUS p16/Ki-67 dual-staining analysis was conducted in cytology results equal to or worse than ASCUS.

Immunostaining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ventana, currently Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

The slides were analyzed searching for the presence of cervical epithelial cytoplasmic brown color and a red nuclear color, indicating concurrent expression of p16 and Ki-67. The presence of one or more cervical epithelial cells with both brown and red color was interpreted as a positive test result. The analyses were made by one of the authors (ALF).

Statistics

Sample size for this study was based on the study of Santos et al. (2002), which detected a Ct prevalence of 20.7% in women aged 14 to 63. To obtain a similar frequency, with 95% CI and 2% error, the present study would have to include 1576 women. However, due to reading failures and material losses, 1481 women were analyzed, thereby attributing an error of 2.07% to the study.

Statistical analysis was conducted based on chi-squared or likelihood-ratio tests. Odds ratio (OR) and the respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The ages of the women enrolled for cervical cancer screening ranged from 18 to 64 years, with a mean of 40 years (SD = 11.2). Most women self-identified as White (58%), 33% were Afro-American while the remaining 9% were mixed race. The majority of subjects (57%) had a stable partner. The mean age at first sexual intercourse was 18 years (SD = 3.9). The number of lifetime sexual partners ranged from 1 to 30, with a mean of 3 partners (SD = 2.5).

Among the 1,481 women, 772 reported to have had at least one prior Pap test examination. Among of the 1351 women who answered the question regarding previous sexually transmitted disease (STD), 87% reported not to have had any prior STD. In relation to smoking, 64% of the women reported to never have smoked, and 17% of the women stopped smoking in the past 12 months.

Frequency of Ct and association with p16/Ki-67

The Ct frequency was of 15.9%. No association was found between Ct and p16/Ki-67 positivity in women with abnormal cytology (Table 1). Only age (Table 2) and the number of lifetime sexual partners (Table 3) showed an association with detection of Ct (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Association of Chlamydia trachomatis with p16/Ki-67

Variable

Chlamydia

OR (95% CI)

Total

P

Negative

Positive

n

%

n

%

p16/Ki67

 Negative

140

84.3

26

15.7

1

166

0.529

 Positive

28

80.0

7

20.0

1.35 (0.5–3.4)

35

Table 2

Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis according to demographic variables

Variable

Chlamydia trachomatis

OR (95% CI)

Total

p

Negative

Positive

n

%

n

%

Age Group

 ≤ 25

125

88.7

16

11.3

1

141

0.040

 26–35

295

84.5

54

15.5

1.43 (0.8–2.6)

349

 36–45

352

80.2

87

19.8

1.93 (1.1–3.4)

439

 46–55

352

86.3

56

13.7

1.24 (0.7–2.2)

408

 > 55

126

87.5

18

12.7

1.12 (0.5–2.3)

144

Schooling (Years)

 < 8

392

82.9

81

17.1

1

473

0.156

 8–11

634

86.4

100

13.6

0.76 (0.6–1.0)

734

 > 11

182

82.4

39

17.6

1.04 (0.7–1.6)

221

Marital Status

 Single

530

85.8

88

14.2

1

618

0.211

 Living with partner

696

83.4

139

16.6

1.20 (0.9–1.6)

835

Smoking

 Never

793

85.7

132

14.3

1

925

0.128

 Currently

234

81.0

55

19.0

1.41 (1.0–2.0)

289

 Previously

202

83.1

41

16.9

1.22 (0.8–1.8)

243

Table 3

Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis according to sexual and obstetric history

Age at sexual debut (years)

 < 15

299

84.0

57

16.0

1

356

0.875

 16–19

622

84.6

113

15.4

0.95 (0.7–1.3)

735

 > 19

298

85.4

51

14.6

0.90 (0.6–1.3)

349

Number of Lifetime Partners

 1–4

1022

85.3

176

14.7

1

1198

0.015

 5–10

195

82.3

42

17.7

1.25 (0.9–1.8)

237

 > 10

12

60.0

8

40.0

3.87 (1.56–9.61)

20

Number of Partners in the Past Year

 0–1

1160

84.7

209

15.3

1

1369

0.709

 2–4

75

81.5

17

18.5

1.26 (0.7–2.2)

92

 > 4

5

83.3

1

16.7

1.11 (0.1–9.5)

6

Parity

 0

230

85.2

40

14.8

1

270

0.804

 1–2

543

85.0

96

15.0

1.02 (0.7–1.5)

639

 > 2

443

83.7

86

16.3

1.12 (0.7–1.7)

529

Prior STD

 No

999

85.5

170

14.5

1

1169

0.083

 Yes

130

80.2

32

19.8

1.45 (0.9–2.2)

162

In particular women between 35 and 45 years old had a higher rate of Ct positivity when compared to women in other age groups. Women with over 10 lifetime partners had the highest rate of being positive for Ct (p = 0.015 OR = 4.14) (Tables 3, 4 and 5).
Table 4

Result of the multiple logistic regression model to explain chlamydia positivity

Variable

OR

IC (95%)

p

Age group (years)

 ≤ 25

1.00

  

 > 25 e ≤ 35

1.50

0.81–2.77

0.195

 > 35 e ≤ 45

2.01

1.12–3.63

0.020

 > 45 e ≤ 55

1.35

0.73–2.47

0.339

 > 55

1.26

0.61–2.63

0.532

Number of partners in life

 1–4

1.00

  

 5–10

1.20

0.83–1.75

0.332

 > 10

4.14

1.66–10.36

0.002

Table 5

Association between Pap smears and Chlamydia trachomatis infection

Variable

Chlamydia trachomatis

OR (95% CI)

Total

P

Negative

Positive

n

%

n

%

Cytology

 Normal/Inflammatory

1038

84.8%

186

15.2

1

1224

0.935

 ASCUS

45

80.4

11

19.6

1.36 (0.7–2.7)

56

 LSIL

134

83.8

26

16.2

1.08 (0.7–1.7)

160

 HSIL

23

82.1

5

17.9

1.21 (0.46–3.2)

28

 AGC

6

85.7

1

14.3

0.93 (0.1–7.8)

7

 SCC

1

100.0

0

0

#

  
Among the histological results, women diagnosed with CIN1 had a higher frequency of Ct compared to women with other cytological findings, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.112) (Table 6).
Table 6

Association between biopsies and Chlamydia trachomatis infection

Variable

Chlamydia trachomatis

OR (95% CI)

Total

P

Negative

Positive

n

%

n

%

Histology

 Normal

86

79.6%

22

20.4

1

108

0.194

 Cervicitis

30

93.8

2

6.2

0.26 (0.06–1.18)

32

 CIN 1

21

77.8

6

22.2

1.12 (0.40–3.1)

27

 CIN2/3

10

76.9

3

23.1

1.17 (0.3–4.63)

13

CIN 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1

CIN2/3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3

Regarding the cytological findings, there was an association between p16/Ki-67 positivity and detection of high-grade lesions (OR = 3.55), confirmed in women with CIN 2/3 who were highly positive for p16/Ki67 (Tables 7 and 8).
Table 7

Association of p16/Ki-67 expression with Low-grade and High-Grade Cytological Diagnosis

Variable

Cytology

OR (95% CI)

Total

P

ASCUS/LSIL

HSIL

n

%

n

%

P16/ki67

 Negative

141

88.1

19

11.9

1.00

160

0.003

 Positive

23

67.6

11

32.4

3.55 (1.50–8.42)

34

Table 8

Association of p16/Ki67 Expression with colposcopy and histological results

Variable

P16/Ki67

OR (95% CI)

Total

P

Negative

Positive

n

%

n

%

Colposcopy/Biopsies

 Normal Colposcopy/No Biopsy

76

90.5

8

9.5

1.00

84

<0.001

 Cervicitis

22

81.5

5

18.5

2.16 (0.64–7.27)

27

 CIN 1

20

76.9

6

23.1

2.85 (0.89–9.16)

26

 CIN 2/3

4

33.3

8

66.7

19.00 (4.67–77.36)

12

 Total

122

81.9

27

18.1

 

149

Chi-squared test; OR and IC (95%) calculated using bivariate logistic regression

CIN1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1

CIN2/3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3

Discussion

Prior studies have investigated the role of microorganisms like Ct that cause a chronic inflammation as a potential risk factor in the transmission and persistence of HPV, as well as contributing to the progression of cervical carcinogenesis [11, 12]. Our study population had a 15.6% frequency of Ct infection, as assessed by analysis of the liquid preservative media utilized for cervical cancer screening. However, we did not detect an association between p16/Ki-67 expression and Ct in women with CIN.

In Brazil, four studies conducted in different states, one in Goiás, two in Paraná and one in Rio Grande do Norte showed a Ct prevalence of 10.9, 10.7, 12.7 and 10.9%, respectively, also compatible with results in the present study. A study conducted in the city of Manaus had a higher prevalence of 20.7%, and may be explained by regional or socioeconomic reasons [4, 1315].

Ct is not an infection subjected to mandatory reporting in Brazil. Additionally, there are no specific programs implemented by the Ministry of Health to encourage screening for this infection. Because it is asymptomatic in most women, it is likely to be under-diagnosed. As such, its true prevalence in this country remains ambiguous. Asymptomatic untested women are obviously not treated. This may account for the high number of positive women in our study. The Ct prevalence estimates must be interpreted within the context of national and cultural differences, of sexual behavior and the health system. Brazil is a very large country whose population has different cultural and socioeconomic development levels, which most likely explains the reported regional differences [1618].

Age was the only demographic variable in this study that was associated with Ct infection. Women aged 35 to 45 years had the highest likelihood of being Ct positive. This observation differs from studies conducted in the United States, where the highest prevalence was among women aged 15 to 24 years. In the United States screening programs for Ct are available for women aged 25 years or younger, and for women at risk for this infection. Increased testing and treatment may explain the overall lower prevalence, as well as the lower rate found among women aged 25 years and older in the United States as compared to Brazil [12].

When assessing other demographic factors, such as years of schooling, marital status and smoking, there was no positive association with Ct presence, similar to what has been reported in other national studies [13].

The analysis of sexual and obstetric history reveals that only the number of lifetime partners was associated with being positive for Ct. Women with more than 10 partners had a four fold higher rate of positivity than did women with 1–4 partners. This is explained by the fact that Ct is a sexually transmitted disease, and infection is associated with high-risk sexual behavior. This association was also demonstrated in a prior Brazilian study [13].

Because it is an infection in which 90% of infected women are asymptomatic but, nevertheless, can have serious consequences for both reproductive and fetal health, Ct has been considered the non-viral STD with the highest burden for public health. Several lines of evidence suggest that screening for Ct is cost effective when its prevalence is above 3%. The few Brazilian studies conducted until now clearly justify the implementation of systematic screening of women for this infection [18].

We did not observe an association between abnormal cervical cytology and the presence of Ct. An analysis of women with abnormal cytological results revealed a higher prevalence of Ct infection in women with atypical lesions (ASCUS), followed by low-grade lesions (LSIL), in which almost 20% were Ct positive. These observed rates were similar to other Brazilian studies with women in the same age group [14].

In women who underwent a colposcopy examination a greater prevalence of Ct positivity was found in women with CIN1. However, the lack of statistical significance may be due to the low number of biopsies conducted after the cytology results. No prior Brazilian studies have assessed this association.

Our study was limited by the lack of HPV testing, due to the limited amount of residual material available. It is necessary, however, to take into consideration the “status” of HPV infection and the natural history of cervical cancer when determining the role of Ct as a co-factor in CIN or invasive cancer. HPV infection is a highly prevalent sexually transmitted viral infection, whereas Ct is the most commonly sexually transmitted bacterial infection, and co-infections with both microorganisms are quite common. No association was found in this study between Ct infection and cytology and positive biopsies for CIN, presumed positive for HPV. These results differ from other studies that found a positive association between HPV and Ct detected by serology [19, 20],. However it was similar to other studies using the same methodology that did not find any association between Ct DNA detection and subsequent risk of CIN2/3 [21, 22].

This study utilized p16/Ki-67 expression as a marker of transforming HPV infections. The study was designed to explore the possible association between a Ct infection and consequences of a persistent HPV infection by the use of p16/Ki-67, instead of testing for HPV DNA. In most cases, HPV DNA is unable to distinguish between persistent and transient infection. We conclude that there is no association between Ct and p16/Ki-67 positivity in women with abnormal cytology [22].

Most women with cytological findings were negative for p16/Ki-67 expression. However, approximately one fourth of the abnormal cytological results were positive for p16/Ki-67 double staining, a finding compatible with publications demonstrating that women with p16/Ki-67 positivity were also the women infected with HPV. Women with HSIL had a higher positivity prevalence (37%) than did women with LSIL. p16/Ki-67 positivity is therefore associated with a threefold higher prevalence in women with a high-grade lesion. These results were comparable to a recent study assessing the use of p16/Ki-67 in a sample from women referred for colposcopy and finding that this marker indeed had a higher positivity in women with high-grade lesions [23, 24].

Evaluation of the association of p16/Ki-67 expression with histopathological results also revealed a higher rate of p16/Ki-67 positivity in women with CIN2 or more advanced lesions. p16/Ki-67 positivity increased with the seriousness of the lesion. When the biopsy result revealed chronic cervicitis, approximately 20% of the cases were positive; positivity was higher with CIN1 (25%) and, in women with CIN2 or more advanced lesions, almost 70% of the cytological preparations were positive for the double stain. The results are consistent with other studies in which p16/Ki-67 activity in a colposcopy population had similar associations [24].

A possible relationship between Ct and either cytological or histopathological alterations characteristic of HPV infection remains to be clarified. An association between Ct and a persistent HPV infection may occur preferentially in high-risk women, while a Ct infection may be associated with the clearance of an HPV infection in women who develop an intense inflammatory response to Ct. The identification of women in whom a concurrent Ct infection may be beneficial or detrimental to HPV persistence and progression remains to be clarified [21, 25, 26].

Conclusion

Ct infection in our study population had a frequency of 15.6% and was associated with age and number of lifetime sexual partners. It was not associated with p16/Ki-67 expression in women with CIN. A possible relationship between Ct and either cytological or histopathological alterations leading to development or persistence of HPV infection remains to be clarified.

Abbreviations

AGC: 

Atypical glandular cells

ASCUS: 

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

CIN: 

Cervical intraepithelial lesions

CIN 1: 

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1

CIN2/3: 

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3

Ct: 

Chlamydia trachomatis

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

HSIL: 

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

LSIL: 

Low-grade lesions

SCC: 

Squamous cell carcinoma

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the study participants, and of Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros local team.

Funding

The authors received no financial support or other form of compensation for the development of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed towards study conception/design of this study. RR and RMCC participated in the recruitment and/or follow-up of subjects. SFM and SD performed Ct detection. LFA and RGG performed cytology and p16/ki-67 dual-stained. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

The Committee of Ethics and Research of Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros and Committee of Ethics of Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo approved this project. All women signed the Free and Clarified Consent Term (FCCT). Plataforma Brasil: (CAAE: 06562112.6.0000.0065) (CAAE: 05330412.1.0000.0063).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Gynecologic Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM) 14, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo
(3)
Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Pio XII Foundation
(4)
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho
(5)
ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory
(6)
Leonor M De Barros Hospital – Secretaria de Saúde de São Paulo
(7)
Federal University of Pelotas – Pelotas
(8)
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo
(9)
Discipline of Infectology, Federal University of São Paulo

References

  1. Motta D, Silva AD, Macedo ABRB, et al. Vigilância epidemiológica dos agravos de notificação compulsória. Brasília: SES/DF; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Fernandes LB, Arruda JT, Approbato MS, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea infection: factors associated with infertility in women treated at a human reproduction public service. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014;36(8):353–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pantoja M, Campos EA, Pitta DR, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women candidates for in vitro fertilization at a public institution of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012;34(9):425–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Piazzetta RC, de Carvalho NS, de Andrade RP, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea infections in sexual actives young women at a southern Brazilian city. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011;33(11):328–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Silva J, Cerqueira F, Medeiros R. Chlamydia trachomatis infection: implications for HPV status and cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(4):715–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytological abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(10):810–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ordi J, Sagasta A, Munmany M, et al. Usefulness of p16/Ki67 immunostaining in the triage of women referred to colposcopy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(3):227–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergeron C, Ronco G, Reuschenbach M, et al. The clinical impact of using p16 immunochemistry in cervical histopathology and cytology: an update of recent developments. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(12):2741–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergeron C, von Knebel Doeberitz M. The role of cytology in the 21st century: The integration of cells and molecules. Acta Cytol. 2016;60:540–542.Google Scholar
  10. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 3rd ed. Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Luostarinen T, Namujju PB, Merikukka M, et al. Order of HPV/Chlamydia infections and cervical high-grade precancer risk: a case-cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(7):1756–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shew ML, Ermel AC, Weaver BA, et al. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with redetection of human papillomavirus after apparent clearance. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(9):1416–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. de Abreu AL, Nogara PR, Souza RP, et al. Molecular detection of HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Brazilian women with abnormal cervical cytology. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(6):1149–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Magalhaes PA, Miranda CA, Lima EG, et al. Genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in women attended at a cervical cancer screening program in Northeastern from Brazil. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(5):1095–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Santos C, Teixeira F, Vicente A, et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical smears of sexually active women in Manaus-AM, Brazil, by PCR. Braz J Infect Dis. 2003;7(2):91–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Available: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2016/prt0204_17_02_2016.html
  17. Redmond SM, Alexander-Kisslig K, Woodhall SC, et al. Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and non-European high income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0115753.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Low N, Cassell JA, Spencer B, et al. Chlamydia control activities in Europe: cross-sectional survey. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(4):556–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Owusu-Edusei Jr K, Chesson HW, Gift TL, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(3):197–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Safaeian M, Quint K, Schiffman M, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of prevalent and incident cervical premalignancy in a population-based cohort. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2010;102(23):1794–804.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith JS, Bosetti C, Munoz N, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and invasive cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(3):431–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Moscicki AB, Schiffman M, Burchell A, et al. Updating the natural history of human papillomavirus and anogenital cancers. Vaccine. 2012;30 Suppl 5:F24–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jensen KE, Thomsen LT, Schmiedel S, Frederiksen K, Norrild B, van den Brule A, Iftner T, Kjær SK. Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse in women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: a cohort study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(7):550–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Longatto Filho A, Utagawa ML, Shirata NK, et al. Immunocytochemical expression of p16INK4A and Ki-67 in cytologically negative and equivocal pap smears positive for oncogenic human papillomavirus. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24(2):118–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wentzensen N, Schwartz L, Zuna RE, et al. Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(15):4154–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosa MI, Fachel JM, Rosa DD, et al. Persistence and clearance of human papillomavirus infection: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):617 e1-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017