Open Access

Burkitt Lymphoma: beyond discoveries

Infectious Agents and Cancer20138:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-8-35

Received: 7 June 2013

Accepted: 17 September 2013

Published: 30 September 2013

Abstract

First described in 1958 in Uganda, Burkitt lymphoma (BL) attracted interest worldwide following reports of its uneven geographic distribution and rapidly fatal clinical course. Both suggested infectious etiology and curability. Seminal discoveries followed in quick succession. Viral etiology – due to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) – was confirmed. Chromosomal translocations, involving cellular MYC, a protooncogene, were discovered, shown to be a hallmark of BL, and central to the genetic basis of cancer. Cure of BL using combination chemotherapy was demonstrated. Unfortunately, civil disturbance in Africa disrupted BL research and blunted its impact on education and oncology care in Africa. Important questions went unanswered. The risk of BL due to malaria or EBV was not quantified. Efforts to answer whether BL could be prevented – by preventing malaria or early EBV infection – were abandoned. The mechanism of malaria in BL is unknown. In Africa, BL remains mostly fatal and diagnosis is still made clinically. Unprecedented advances in molecular, genomics and proteomic technologies, promising to unlock mysteries of cancers, have re-awakened interest in BL. With return of stability to Africa, the unanswered questions about BL are re-attracting global interest. This interest now includes exploiting the knowledge gained about genetics, proteomics, and bioinformatics to enable the development of targeted less toxic treatment for BL; and simpler methods to diagnose BL with high accuracy and sensitivity. The articles in the Burkitt Lymphoma (BL): Beyond Discoveries in Infectious Agents and Cancer highlight BL as priority. Authors explore etiology, pathology, pathogenesis of BL, and whether knowledge gained in the studies of BL can catalyze sustainable cancer services in one of the world’s poorest served regions.

Burkitt lymphoma: beyond discoveries

Infectious Agents and Cancer is pleased to present a thematic series entitled Burkitt Lymphoma (BL): Beyond Discoveries. BL is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)[1] that was first described in African children by Dennis Burkitt[2]. Within less than 10 years, Burkitt’s report of an obscure tumor in Africa had a dramatic impact on epidemiology, virology, immunology and oncology, spawning over 10,000 publications within a few decades of it’s description in 1958[3]. Originally considered peculiar to Africa, characterization of histochemical and cytological properties of BL[1, 4, 5] led to recognition of cases worldwide and realization that the discovery had a universal relevance[6]. Notable geographic differences in BL incidence were apparent and suggested etiology by a vectored virus[7]. They also suggested an intuitive classification of the types of BL as “endemic BL “when occurring at a high incidence and “sporadic BL” when occurring at low incidence[7].

Study of BL led to a quick succession of seminal discoveries. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was discovered in 1964 in tumor cells cultured from an African case examined by electron microscopy[8]. Dramatic response to chemotherapy and cure of BL was reported and replicated in trial and error efforts[9, 10]. Chromosomal translocations involving light and heavy chain immunoglobulin genes and MYC were discovered in BL tumors[11, 12], unlocking new ways to study tumor biology (Figure 1). The study of mouse tumors with analogous translocations - plasmacytomas -became an important resource to developing monoclonal antibodies. In 1969, after epidemiological studies confirmed that EBV, the virus found in BL tumors, was not transmitted by a vector[13], Dennis Burkitt proposed recurrent infection with Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) as co-factor in BL etiology[14]. Today, BL is considered a model disease to understand the poly-microbial and the genetic basis of cancer[15]. Specifically, a pathogenesis model can be constructed (Figure 1), where the nodes of risk comprise of exposures to infections that may increase the risk of developing chromosomal translocation and exposures that confer longevity to translocation-positive B cells by circumventing apoptosis feedback loops induced by overexpression of c-MYC.
Figure 1

A cartoon showing a simple pathogenesis model of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) showing progression from a naïve B cell through a necessary pre-malignant stage involving chromosomal translocation of MYC on chromosome 8 into the vicinity of promoter elements of immunoglobulin genes on chromosome 14, 2, or 22 and progression of translocation-positive B cells to a clone of malignant BL. The first stage is indicated by letter a and the second stage by letter b. The transit times for these stages are unknown, but several assumptions are possible. First, exogenous exposures linked to high risk of BL, such as infection with malaria, Epstein-Barr virus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – in the West – may act by increasing the absolute number (load) of translocation-positive B cells, which would increase the number of initiated cells that can progress to BL and, hence, population incidence of BL. Second, the rate-limiting step of BL is the apoptosis feedback loop in translocation-positive B cells. Thus, exposures that increase the survival, i.e., circumvent apoptosis feedback loops in translocation-positive B cells until the abnormal cells develop capacity for self-perpetuation will increase the individual risk of BL.

Many questions about BL remain unanswered. For example, the definition of BL and its subtypes remains a matter of debate[16]. Dennis Burkitt described a purely clinical entity in Africa[2]. In 1969, a consensus conference organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in Washington D.C. reviewed tumor tissues from patients with clinical BL and reached a consensus definition that BL was a distinct patho-biological entity characterized by specific histological features or properties[17]. This pathologic definition has changed over the years as pathology techniques have evolved. Refinements in histochemical stains, morphological, cytogenetic, immunophenotypic and, molecular techniques have led to description of classical cases, variously referred to typical or classical BL, and variant cases referred to as atypical BL or BL-like. The pathology properties noted above are unrelated to the intuitive clinico-epidemiological classification of BL as endemic, sporadic, and immunodeficiency associated BL.

The infectious etiology of BL was recognized immediately. Despite this, until the advent of the HIV epidemic and application of organ transplant technologies, which necessitated immunosuppressive therapy to prevent organ rejection, no clear evidence linking immunosuppression in individuals to the risk of BL was adduced[18]. Other provocative questions went unanswered. These include why jaw tumors occur significantly more commonly in males than females, particularly in prepubescent children[19]. Because BL is endemic in Africa, it has always been assumed that basal risk for BL is higher in Blacks even in areas where BL is sporadic. However, data from the U.S., where many Blacks live and BL is sporadic suggest that the risk of BL may be lower in Blacks than Whites[20, 21]. Why? Blacks in the U.S. are more likely to be of a lower socioeconomic status and therefore more likely to be exposed to EBV at a younger age[22]. Assuming EBV conveys an independent risk of BL risk, one would predict that the risk of BL would be higher in Blacks than in Whites. Yet the opposite has been repeatedly observed, even in the setting of immunosuppression[23, 24]. If EBV is relevant, then is early exposure to EBV in the absence of malaria protective for BL? If EBV is irrelevant, then do Blacks have a lower basal genetic risk of BL? Or are there other local exposures in Africa that are the culprit? Likewise, the higher risk of BL in young males compared to females, observed in endemic, sporadic, and immunodeficiency BL is an unsolved puzzle. Answers to these questions could provide new clues about lymphoma biology. The endemicity of BL maps quite well with holo-endemic malaria, in and outside of Africa (example, Papua New Guinea). But if early acquisition of EBV and malaria together increase risk for BL, why is BL not endemic in other malarial regions, such as in India and Burma? Are there differences in risk posed by P. falciparum and P. vivax? Are differences in clinical presentations and EBV association of endemic and sporadic BL indicative of truly different clinical entities? Are EBV positive jaw tumors seen in 'non endemic” settings like Turkey[25] similar to disease in Africa?

The treatment approaches of BL in the West reflect lessons learnt from trial and error efforts treating endemic BL[26]. Today, treatment of BL is highly effective in the West and response and cure rates to present day regimens are >90%[27]. In Africa, long-term cure rates have remained low and have not moved beyond rates of 25-30% described in early days[28]. While the reasons for poor outcomes are due to limited resources and capacity, it is also possible that many cases are either not spotted or are diagnosed late and when diagnosed and treated, they abandon treatment[29]. Would efforts to intensify case spotting, early diagnosis and referral to treatment centers significantly affect mortality in Africa[30]? Moreover, current BL treatment is associated with life-threatening side effects, which complicate its use in Africa where intensive-care services are basic[31]. Would discovery of newer drugs, but with fewer side effects increase uptake and bring lifesaving benefits to African children[32]. How could our understanding of the genetic and the poly-microbial basis of BL be harnessed for treatment and prevention? How EBV and malaria cause BL remains poorly understood[3, 33]. Clarifying the biological pathways exploited by these infections to influence risk for BL (Figure 1) could unlock ways to diagnose[34], treat and or prevent BL. The outstanding of bottlenecks to BL research illustrated by the cartoon include lack of methods to measure the prevalence and load of c-MYC translocation-positive B cells reliably and reproducibly in asymptomatic individuals[11, 35]. Development of sensitive tests that can be used in epidemiologic studies could clarify the role of malaria, EBV, and other co-factors. Secondly, such tests could open new avenues for investigation, including cohort studies of children with a high load of c-MYC translocation-positive B cells. While the brief review indicates some understanding of epidemiological and immunological risk factors of BL (Figure 2), our understanding of the genetic basis of BL still remains rudimentary. The interest in BL that is re-emerging is timely because the unprecedented advances in molecular, genomics and proteomic technologies could unlock the mysteries of BL and deliver on its promise as the Rosetta Stone of Cancer[36].
Figure 2

A schema showing studies of multi-factorial etiology of Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Descriptive epidemiological studies have demonstrated sex, age, and geography as risk factors. Immunological and biomarker studies have demonstrated increased risk related to infections that disrupt immunity, such as malaria, human immunodeficiency virus, and use of solid organ transplantation as risk factors. The genetic basis of BL remains largely explored and represents the next frontier in BL research.

Through the articles in Burkitt Lymphoma (BL): Beyond Discoveries, Infectious Agents and Cancer aims to highlight BL as a priority, which allows unique opportunities for scientists, policy makers, program managers in countries where BL is endemic to collaborate. Their challenge will be to answer to what extent the discoveries made about BL will impact the life of a child with or at risk of BL in Africa. Can knowledge gained in the studies of BL, conducted both in African countries solely outside Africa, be translated into affordable implementable programs that introduce or catalyze sustainable cancer services in one of the world’s poorest served regions[37]. Some of these questions are not be new, but there are new toolboxes in the present genomic era to answer new and old questions. These issues and others, not explicitly touched, will be discussed in the various papers collected in the thematic issue introduced here.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch

References

  1. Wright DH: Cytology and histochemistry of the Burkitt lymphoma. British J Cancer. 1963, 17: 50-55. 10.1038/bjc.1963.7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Burkitt D: A sarcoma involving the jaws in African children. Br J Surg. 1958, 46 (197): 218-223. 10.1002/bjs.18004619704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Klein G: Burkitt lymphoma–a stalking horse for cancer research?. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009, 19 (6): 347-350. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.07.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. O’Conor GT, Davies JN: Malignant tumors in African children. With special reference to malignant lymphoma. J Pediatr. 1960, 56: 526-535. 10.1016/S0022-3476(60)80369-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkitt D, O’Conor GT: Malignant lymphoma in African children I. A clinical syndrome. Cancer. 1961, 14: 258-269. 10.1002/1097-0142(196103/04)14:2<258::AID-CNCR2820140206>3.0.CO;2-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkitt D: Burkitt’s lymphoma outside the known endemic areas of Africa and New Guinea. IntJ Cancer J Int du Cancer. 1967, 2 (6): 562-565. 10.1002/ijc.2910020603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkitt D: A children’s cancer dependent on climatic factors. Nature. 1962, 194: 232-234. 10.1038/194232a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein MA, Achong BG, Barr YM: Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lancet. 1964, 1 (7335): 702-703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ziegler JL, Deisseroth AB, Applebaum FR, Graw RG: Burkitt’s lymphoma–a model for intensive chemotherapy. Seminars Oncol. 1977, 4 (3): 317-323.Google Scholar
  10. Ziegler JL, DeVita VT, Graw RG, Herzig G, Leventhal BG, Levine AS, Pomeroy TC: Combined modality treatment of American Burkitt’s lymphoma. Cancer. 1976, 38 (6): 2225-2231. 10.1002/1097-0142(197612)38:6<2225::AID-CNCR2820380606>3.0.CO;2-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Manolov G, Manolova Y: Marker band in one chromosome 14 from Burkitt lymphomas. Nature. 1972, 237 (5349): 33-34. 10.1038/237033a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalla-Favera R, Bregni M, Erikson J, Patterson D, Gallo RC, Croce CM: Human c-myc onc gene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982, 79 (24): 7824-7827. 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7824.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Henle G, Henle W, Clifford P, Diehl V, Kafuko GW, Kirya BG, Klein G, Morrow RH, Munube GM, Pike P, et al.: Antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in Burkitt’s lymphoma and control groups. J Nat Cancer Insti. 1969, 43 (5): 1147-1157.Google Scholar
  14. Burkitt DP: Etiology of Burkitt’s lymphoma–an alternative hypothesis to a vectored virus. J Nat Cancer Insti. 1969, 42 (1): 19-28.Google Scholar
  15. Rochford R, Cannon MJ, Moormann AM: Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma: a polymicrobial disease?. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3 (2): 182-187. 10.1038/nrmicro1089.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright DH: What is Burkitt’s lymphoma and when is it endemic?. Blood. 1999, 93 (2): 758-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Carbone PP, Berard CW, Bennett JM, Ziegler JL, Cohen MH, Gerber P: NIH clinical staff conference. Burkitt’s tumor. Annals Int Med. 1969, 70 (4): 817-832. 10.7326/0003-4819-70-4-817.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ziegler JL, Cohen MH, Morrow RH, Kyalwazi SK, Carbone PP: Immunologic studies in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Cancer. 1970, 25 (3): 734-739. 10.1002/1097-0142(197003)25:3<734::AID-CNCR2820250335>3.0.CO;2-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Burkitt D, Wright D: Geographical and tribal distribution of the African lymphoma in Uganda. British med J. 1966, 1 (5487): 569-573. 10.1136/bmj.1.5487.569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Levine PH, Connelly RR, McKay FW: Burkitt’s lymphoma in the USA: cases reported to the American Burkitt Lymphoma Registry compared with population-based incidence and mortality data. IARC Sci Publ. 1985, 60: 217-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mbulaiteye SM, Biggar RJ, Bhatia K, Linet MS, Devesa SS: Sporadic childhood Burkitt lymphoma incidence in the United States during 1992–2005. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2009, 53 (3): 366-370. 10.1002/pbc.22047.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Brodsky AL, Heath CW: Infectious mononucleosis: epidemiologic patterns at United States colleges and universities. Am J Epidemiol. 1972, 96 (2): 87-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Guech-Ongey M, Simard EP, Anderson WF, Engels EA, Bhatia K, Devesa SS, Mbulaiteye SM: AIDS-related Burkitt lymphoma in the United States: what do age and CD4 lymphocyte patterns tell us about etiology and/or biology?. Blood. 2010, 116 (25): 5600-5604. 10.1182/blood-2010-03-275917.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mbulaiteye SM, Clarke CA, Morton LM, Gibson TM, Pawlish K, Weisenburger DD, Lynch CF, Goodman MT, Engels EA: Burkitt lymphoma risk in U.S. solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Hematol. 2013, 88 (4): 245-250. 10.1002/ajh.23385.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Celkan TT, Baris S, Ozdemir N, Ozkan A, Apak H, Dogru O, Karaman S, Canbolat A, Ozdil M, Aki H, et al.: Treatment of pediatric Burkitt lymphoma in Turkey. J Pediatric Hematol Oncol. 2010, 32 (7): e279-e284. 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181e90017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ziegler JL: Treatment results of 54 American patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma are similar to the African experience. N Engl J Med. 1977, 297 (2): 75-80. 10.1056/NEJM197707142970202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Patte C, Auperin A, Michon J, Behrendt H, Leverger G, Frappaz D, Lutz P, Coze C, Perel Y, Raphael M, et al.: The societe francaise d’Oncologie pediatrique LMB89 protocol: highly effective multiagent chemotherapy tailored to the tumor burden and initial response in 561 unselected children with B-cell lymphomas and L3 leukemia. Blood. 2001, 97 (11): 3370-3379. 10.1182/blood.V97.11.3370.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mbulaiteye SM, Talisuna AO, Ogwang MD, McKenzie FE, Ziegler JL, Parkin DM: African Burkitt’s lymphoma: could collaboration with HIV-1 and malaria programmes reduce the high mortality rate?. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9726): 1661-1663. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60134-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips JA: Is Burkitt’s lymphoma sexy enough?. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9554): 2251-2252. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69898-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Baik S, Mbaziira M, Williams M, Ogwang MD, Kinyera T, Emmanuel B, Ziegler JL, Reynolds SJ, Mbulaiteye SM: A case–control study of Burkitt lymphoma in East Africa: are local health facilities an appropriate source of representative controls?. Infect Agents Cancer. 2012, 7 (1): 5-10.1186/1750-9378-7-5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Molyneux EM, Rochford R, Griffin B, Newton R, Jackson G, Menon G, Harrison CJ, Israels T, Bailey S: Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lancet. 2012, 379 (9822): 1234-1244. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61177-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmitz R, Young RM, Ceribelli M, Jhavar S, Xiao W, Zhang M, Wright G, Shaffer AL, Hodson DJ, Buras E, et al.: Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics. Nature. 2012, 490 (7418): 116-120. 10.1038/nature11378.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bornkamm GW: Epstein-Barr virus and its role in the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma: an unresolved issue. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009, 19 (6): 351-365. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.07.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Mbulaiteye SM, Pullarkat ST, Nathwani BN, Weiss LM, Nagesh R, Emmanuel B, Lynch CF, Hernandez B, Neppalli V, Hawes D, et al.: Epstein-Barr virus patterns in US Burkitt lymphoma tumors from the SEER residual tissue repository during 1979–2009. APMIS: Acta pathol microbiol et immunol Scand. 2013, doi:10.1111/apm.12078. Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  35. Muller JR, Janz S, Goedert JJ, Potter M, Rabkin CS: Persistence of immunoglobulin heavy chain/c-myc recombination-positive lymphocyte clones in the blood of human immunodeficiency virus-infected homosexual men. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92 (14): 6577-6581. 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6577.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. de-The G, Geser A, Day NE, Tukei PM, Williams EH, Beri DP, Smith PG, Dean AG, Bronkamm GW, Feorino P, et al.: Epidemiological evidence for causal relationship between Epstein-Barr virus and Burkitt’s lymphoma from Ugandan prospective study. Nature. 1978, 274 (5673): 756-761. 10.1038/274756a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lingwood RJ, Boyle P, Milburn A, Ngoma T, Arbuthnott J, McCaffrey R, Kerr SH, Kerr DJ: The challenge of cancer control in Africa. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8 (5): 398-403. 10.1038/nrc2372.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mbulaiteye; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.