Skip to main content

Detection of Epstein–Barr virus infection in thymic epithelial tumors by nested PCR and Epstein–Barr-encoded RNA ISH

Abstract

Background

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is well known to be associated with a lot of tumors, including lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma, and some other carcinomas with similar lymphoepithelioma-like features. However, the association between EBV and thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) is inconclusive as reports in this regard are not entirely consistent and the methods employed are of different sensitivity and specificity. The geographical difference of the patients is also one of the reasons for the different points of view.

Methods

In our study, we examined 72 thymomas, including 3 cases of type A thymomas, 27 cases of type AB, 6 cases of type B1, 26 cases of type B2 and 10 cases of type B3 thymomas, and 15 thymic carcinomas to detect the viral genome at both DNA and RNA levels. The genome DNA of fresh tissues was first screened by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which could be regarded as the most sensitive method to detect small amounts of DNA. Then all the tissue blocks were further submitted for viral localization by Epstein–Barr-encoded RNA (EBER) ISH. Group parameters were assessed using the chi-square test at a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Nested PCR results showed that none of type A, eight (29.6%) type AB, one (16.7%) type B1, fifteen (57.7%) type B2, and four (40.0%) type B3 were positive for EBV genome. However, none of them detected EBER expression except for one case of type B2 thymoma. Fourteen (93.3%) thymic carcinomas were positive for EBV by nested PCR, of which three displayed weak nuclear signals within the tumor cells by EBER ISH.

Conclusions

These results showed that nested PCR was a sensitive method for screening the EBV genome in thymic epithelial tumors. As the malignancy of thymoma increases, the rate of EBV infection became higher. Thymic carcinomas were well associated with the Epstein–Barr virus.There was significant association between the EBV infection rate and thymoma type (p < 0.05). We further analyzed the association between EBV infection and myasthenia gravis. However, it showed no significant difference(p = 0.2754), although the EBV infection rate was higher in the thymomas with myasthenia gravis.

Introduction

Epstein–Barr virus was firstly introduced in 1964 from a Burkitt’s lymphoma patient’s (Burkett’s lymphoma, BL)living tissue and was separated during inspection [1]. It is a ubiquitous cause of infection in the human world widely. 2013 American survey found that the sero-positive rate of children aged 6 to 8 years was 50%, 18- to 19-year-old positive rate was 89% [2]. Epstein-Barr virus initially enters the human body by infecting human oral epithelial cells, and then invades the human B lymphocytes, and can be latently infected in the human body for a lifetime. The EBV genome is approximately 172 kb and consists of a linear double-stranded DNA molecule that can encode more than 85 genes. The coding genes are currently known as 6 nuclear antigens (EBV nuclear antigen, EBNA), 3 latent membrane proteins (LMP), small non-polyadenylated RNAs, EBER1 and 2, microRNA and several early lytic genes [3].

The role of EBV is well known in the pathogenesis of infectious mononucleosis, Burkitt’s lymphoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma [4, 5]. EBV has also been detected in a variety of non-nasopharyngeal carcinomas, including carcinomas of the salivary glands, lungs and stomach, mostly with similar lymphoepithelioma-like features [6,7,8].

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare thymic neoplasms including a series of tumors characterized by lymphoepithelioma-like features. Although the correlation between TETs and EBV infection has been reported previously. However, the association between EBV infection and thymic epithelial tumors is controversial.

TETs include two broad categories: thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Thymoma is defined as an organotypic tumor derived from thymic epithelium, with low-grade cytology. According to the fifth edition of the WHO classification of thymic epithelial tumors, there are five different types of thymic tumors (A, AB, B1, B2, and B3) [9]. Based on the shape of the neoplastic cell: type A and type B thymomas are described. Type A thymomas have the best prognosis and are usually low stage. Type AB tumors are similar to type A, but have foci of neoplastic lymphocytes. Type B thymomas are sub-divided into three categories (B1, B2, and B3) on the basis of the proportional increase in thymocytes and cellular atypia. As lesions progress from A to B3, there is also a progressive deterioration of the prognosis. Thymic carcinoma is a heterogeneous group of high-grade malignant thymic epithelial neoplasms. All Western and Asian series failed to demonstrate the roles EBV played in thymomas. McGuire et al. from Hong Kong reported two thymomas and three of five thymic lymphoid hyperplasia were positive for the EBV genome [10]. Chen PC examined EBV of 78 thymomas and 21 thymic carcinomas in Taiwanese patients at both DNA and RNA levels, they found none of the thymomas showed a detectable EBV genome. Eight thymic carcinomas were positive for EBV by nested PCR, of which six displayed nuclear signals within the tumor cells by in situ PCR ISH and/or RNA ISH [11]. Due to regional differences in EBV infection as well as TETs rare incidence, investigators could not have a unified cognition. Since the EBV infection rate increased in recent years, this prompted us to undertake the present investigation to address the issue more thoroughly, we speculated that there might be a higher likelihood of EBV involvement in thymic epithelial tumors.

Methods

Case collection

72 cases of thymoma and 15 cases of thymic carcinomas were retrieved from the Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated with Fudan University. The pathological slides were reviewed and the tumors were classified according to the newly published WHO classification in 2015 [12]. The thymomas included 3 cases of type A thymomas, 27 cases of type AB thymomas, 6 cases of type B1 thymomas, 26 cases of type B2 thymomas, and 10 cases of type B3 thymomas. The patients’ ages ranged from 18 years to 74 years old, with a median of 54 years old in the thymoma group, and from 44 years to 76 years, with a median of 58 years in the thymic carcinoma group. 9 cases of thymomas and 2 cases of thymic carcinomas had MG, respectively.

DNA extraction

Firstly, grind the tissue and add 460 µl nuclear lysate into a 1.5 ml EP tube, add 20 µl 20 mg/ml proteinase K (20 mg/ml) and 20 µl 10% SDS, 58℃ overnight, the next day add 5 µl of RNase for 2–4 h. Then add 500 µl phenol-chloroform (PH > 7.8) into the EP tube, after centrifugation (13.0 × 103 g) for 20 min, it is divided into 3 layers, the upper layer is the DNA layer, suck the upper layer, add an equal volume of isopropanol and centrifuge for seconds. Add 1/10 volume of 3 M NaAC of the upper aspirate liquid, 4℃ 12,000 rpm 35 min, wash twice with 900 µl 75% RNA-free alcohol, and finally add RNase-free water to dissolve DNA.

Nested PCR amplification

The first and second PCR conditions were both 35 cycles at 94℃, 30 seconds, 55℃, 30 seconds, and 72℃, 30 seconds. The first PCR amplification was performed using an external pair of primers with an upstream sequence of 5’-TTCATCACCGTCGCTGACT-3’ and a downstream sequence of 5’-ACCGCTTACCACCTCCTCT-3’. The first round PCR amplified a 298-base pair (bp) DNA fragment. The second PCR amplification was then performed using 1 µl of the first PCR product as a template and an internal pair of primers with an upstream sequence of 5’-CCAGAGGTAAGTGGACTT-3’ and a downstream sequence of 5’-GACCGGTGCCTTCTTAGG-3’. These two primer sets amplified a 122 bp DNA fragment within the first tandem internal repeats of EBV. After electrophoresis and gene green staining, the PCR product was visualized in a UV box. The amplified DNA product had been verified by first-generation sequencing.

EBER RNA ISH

4 μm sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were mounted on silicon-coated glass slides, dried on a 56℃ oven overnight, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and digested by proteinase K (20 mg/ml), following the standard protocol. ISH was performed using a dig-labeled EBER riboprobe. Hematoxylin was used as a counterstain.

Statistic

The association of EBV infection in different groups were assessed using Chi-square test. A p-value < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

TETs showed a detectable EBV genome by nested PCR

Nested PCR is a sensitive method to test the EBV genome. We detected 72 thymomas and 15 thymic carcinomas for the EBV infection. The nested PCR results showed that none of the type A thymoma was positive for the EBV genome. Eight of twenty-seven (29.6%) cases of type AB thymomas were positive for the EBV genome. One (16.7%) type B1, fifteen (57.7%) type B2, and four (40.0%) type B3 thymomas were detected to have EBV infection, respectively. 14 of 15 thymic carcinomas were EBV positive.Chi-square test showed a significant association between the EBV infection rate and thymoma type (p < 0.05) Table 1. And we can see a 298 bp amplification product of PCR first and then a final 122 bp amplification product (Fig. 1A, B). The final amplification product was also checked by first-generation sequencing.

Table 1 The EBV positive rate in different groups
Fig. 1
figure 1

Genome DNA nested PCR gel electrophoresis. Detection of EBV DNA by nested PCR after the first round of amplification. The 298 bp product was seen in lane (A). One of the representative results was shown here. And the 122 bp amplification products were seen in lanes 2, 7 and 8 after the second round of amplification. No bands were visualized in lanes 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12. Lane 1 and 13 were the negative and positive control, respectively (B). The lane marked “Marker” is the 100 bp ladder (100–1500 bp) DNA marker

One case of B2 thymoma and three thymic carcinomas were positive for EBER

All of the above cases were also verified by EBER RNA ISH. However, most cases were negative for EBER (Fig. 2A). Only one type B2 thymoma showed positive signals within the infiltrating lymphocytes (Fig. 2B). Three thymic carcinomas, which were positive in nested PCR, showed positive nuclear signals within the tumor cells by EBER RNA ISH (Fig. 2C, D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

One case of type B2 thymoma and 2 cases of thymic carcinomas were positive for EBER. (A) No signals were visible either in lymphocytes or in tumor cells. (B) The B2 thymoma showed positive signals only within the infiltrating lymphocytes (arrow heads). (C, D) EBER ISH showed nuclear signals within the tumor cells of thymic carcinoma (arrow, x100)

EBV was related to thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis

The information of EBV infection and myasthenia gravis (MG) of patients was shown in Table 2. In the MG + group, the EBV positive rate was 63.6% (7/11), which was higher than the MG- group 43.4% (33/76). It showed no significant difference between EBV infection and thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (p = 0.2754) Table 3.

Table 2 EBV DNA detection in MG and non-MG TETs
Table 3 The association between EBV infection and MG

Discussion

Over the past decades, shreds of evidence have emerged to indicate the involvement of EBV in various malignancies, such as Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and nasopharyngeal carcinomas. EBV is also present in tumors of similar morphology (lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas) arising in a variety of organs, predominantly in stomach, salivary gland and thymus. As reports of EBV-positive TETs have been divergent and as different methods have been used to detect EBV, the role of EBV in the oncogenesis of thymoma is controversial.

In 1985, Leyvraz found that thymic carcinoma was associated with EBV infection, which was probably the earliest case report [13]. Thereafter, more and more cases were reported. Niehues T et al. reported a 14-year-old boy with EBV-associated thymic carcinoma [14]. Stéphan JL reported Epstein-Barr virus-positive undifferentiated thymic carcinoma in a 12-year-old white girl [15]. Matsuno Y reported Epstein-Barr virus DNA in a Japanese case of lymphoepithelioma-like thymic carcinoma [16]. Giordano S hypothesizes that EBV infection could have caused thymoma [17]. Fujii T also reported in three previous cases of EBV-associated thymic carcinoma, lymphoepithelioma-like thymic carcinoma was shown to be closely associated with EBV in their series [18]. Takeuchi H described the first case of EBV-associated thymic carcinoid tumor found by in situ hybridization (ISH) on paraffin-embedded Sect.  [19]. Recently, Zhang et al. conducted a systematic review of relevant studies published between January 1980 and December 2013 also suggesting that the prevalence of EBV in TET plays a minor role in TET pathogenesis [20].

The researchers above almost employed ISH to detect the EBV infection, and they reached an agreement that EBV was associated with thymic carcinoma but not thymoma. In our study, 72 thymomas and 15 thymic carcinomas were used to detect the viral genome at both DNA and RNA levels. We employed nested PCR to test the EBV DNA. The RNA levels were detected by Epstein–Barr-encoded RNA (EBER) ISH. The nested PCR results showed detectable EBV genome in none of type A thymoma, eight (29.6%) type AB, one (16.7%) type B1, fifteen (57.7%) type B2, four (40.0%) type B3 and fourteen (93.3%) thymic carcinomas, respectively. As the malignancy of TETs increases, EBV infection became higher gradually (p < 0.05). In 2004 WHO pulmonary, pleural and mediastinal tumors, type A, AB was classed into benign tumors, which also had a low EBV infection rate in our study. A close relationship between EBV infection and thymic carcinomas was found, which is consistent with the previous studies. However, only one type B2 thymoma showed discernible in situ signals by EBER ISH. And three cases of thymic carcinomas showed weak signals by EBER ISH. These results demonstrate that nested PCR is a sensitive method for screening the EBV genome in thymic epithelial tumors and thymic carcinomas are more often associated with the virus as previously reported.

There also existed some opposite opinions. Engel et al. analyzed 157 cases of TETs of Danish patients for EBV by applying in situ hybridization for EBER. All investigated cases were EBER negative. Therefore, they supposed that EBV does not seem to be implicated in the pathogenesis of TETs [21]. 16 western thymomas were investigated for the presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA sequences. The result showed none of the 16 thymomas contained evidence of the EBV genome. These results fail to demonstrate the EBV genome in western thymomas and stand in contrast to those of McGuire who previously reported that the EBV genome is present in thymomas occurring in southern Chinese patients [22].

Recently, it is reported that EBV is involved in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis [23, 24]. Here, we also analyzed the relationship between EBV infection and thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis.However, we found no significant difference between EBV infection and thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis in this research (p = 0.2754) Table 3, perhaps we did not involve a sufficient sample size.

Conclusion

Generally speaking, several factors influence the judge about the roles EBV played in TETs. Firstly, EBV is a widespread infection in the population, with an infection rate of more than 90% in children aged 3 to 5 years. And the infected person would carry the virus for life. Secondly, the EBV infection rate is different due to different regions and environments. This explained why EBV associated TETs were different in different parts of the world. Thirdly, EBV positive rates were inconsistent due to different sensitivity and specificity of the detection methods. More researches still need to be done to figure out the relationship between TETs and EBV.

References

  1. Epstein MA, Achong BG, Barr YM. Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s Lymphoma. Lancet. 1964;1(7335):702–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balfour HH, Sifakis J, Sliman F, Knight JA, Schmeling JA, Thomas DO. Age-specific prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus infection among individuals aged 6–19 years in the United States and factors affecting its acquisition. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(8):1286–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neves M, Marinho-Dias J, Ribeiro J, Sousa H. Epstein-Barr virus strains and variations: Geographic or disease-specific variants? J Med Virol. 2017;89(3):373–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang L, Song YL, Huang SM, Tao HX, Zhao YQ, Yan N, Xu DY. [The clinical significance of EBV DNA analysis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening]. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;32(4):298–301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vockerodt M, Yap LF, Shannon-Lowe C, Curley H, Wei W, Vrzalikova K, Murray PG. The Epstein-Barr virus and the pathogenesis of lymphoma. J Pathol. 2015;235(2):312–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki S, Nishikawa J, Sakai K, Iizasa H, Yoshiyama H, Yanagihara M, Shuto T, Shimokuri K, Kanda T, Suehiro Y, Yamasaki T, Sakaida I. EBV-associated gastric cancer evades T-cell immunity by PD-1/PD-L1 interactions. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(3):486–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mozaffari HR, Ramezani M, Janbakhsh A, Sadeghi M. Malignant salivary gland tumors and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(5):1201–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong S, Liu D, Luo S, Fang W, Zhan J, Fu S, Zhang Y, Wu X, Zhou H, Chen X, Chen G, Zhang Z, Zheng Q, Li X, Chen J, Liu X, Lei M, Ye C, Wang J, Yang H, Xu X, Zhu S, Yang Y, Zhao Y, Zhou N, Zhao H, Huang Y, Zhang L, Wu K, Zhang L. The genomic landscape of Epstein-Barr virus-associated pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marx A, Chan JKC, Chalabreysse L, Dacic S, Detterbeck F, French CA, Hornick JL, Inagaki H, Jain D, Lazar AJ, Marino M, Marom EM, Moreira AL, Nicholson AG, Noguchi M, Nonaka D, Papotti MG, Porubsky S, Sholl LM, Tateyama H, de Thomas V, Travis WD, Rajan A, Roden AC, Strobel P. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the Thymus and Mediastinum: what is New in Thymic Epithelial, Germ Cell, and mesenchymal tumors? J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(2):200–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire LJ, Huang DP, Teoh R, Arnold M, Wong K, Lee JC. Epstein-Barr virus genome in thymoma and thymic lymphoid hyperplasia. Am J Pathol. 1988;131(3):385–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen PC, Pan CC, Yang AH, Wang LS, Chiang H. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus genome within thymic epithelial tumours in taiwanese patients by nested PCR, PCR in situ hybridization, and RNA in situ hybridization. J Pathol. 2002;197(5):684–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marx A, Chan JK, Coindre JM, Detterbeck F, Girard N, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Kurrer MO, Marom EM, Moreira AL, Mukai K, Orazi A, Strobel P. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the Thymus: continuity and changes. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(10):1383–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Leyvraz S, Henle W, Chahinian AP, Perlmann C, Klein G, Gordon RE, Rosenblum M, Holland JF. Association of Epstein-Barr virus with thymic carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(20):1296–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niehues T, Harms D, Jurgens H, Gobel U. Treatment of pediatric malignant thymoma: long-term remission in a 14-year-old boy with EBV-associated thymic carcinoma by aggressive, combined modality treatment. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996;26(6):419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephan JL, Galambrun C, Boucheron S, Varlet F, Delabesse E, MacIntyre E. Epstein-Barr virus–positive undifferentiated thymic carcinoma in a 12-year-old white girl. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;22(2):162–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuno Y, Mukai K, Uhara H, Akao I, Furuya S, Sato Y, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in a japanese case of lymphoepithelioma-like thymic carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1992;83(2):127–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Giordano S, Pampinella D, Alu M, Agostara B, Romano A. [EBV reactivation in a patient undergoing chemotherapy for invasive thymoma]. Infez Med. 2007;15(3):195–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujii T, Kawai T, Saito K, Fukushima K, Hasegawa T, Tokunaga M, Yokoyama T. EBER-1 expression in thymic carcinoma. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1993;43(3):107–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi H, Fujita H, Iwasaki F, Takeuchi T, Imadome K, Okumiya T, Matsui T, Takahashi M. A case of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-associated thymic carcinoid and investigation of existence of EBV-infected cells in thymus and thymic tumors. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(6):2850–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang G, Yu Z, Shen G, Chai Y, Liang C. Association between Epstein-Barr virus and thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review. Infect Agent Cancer. 2019;14:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Engel PJ. Absence of latent Epstein-Barr virus in thymic epithelial tumors as demonstrated by Epstein-Barr-encoded RNA(EBER) in situ hybridization. APMIS. 2000;108(6):393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Inghirami G, Chilosi M, Knowles DM. Western thymomas lack Epstein-Barr virus by Southern blotting analysis and by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Pathol. 1990;136(6):1429–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Csuka D, Banati M, Rozsa C, Fust G, Illes Z. High anti-EBNA-1 IgG levels are associated with early-onset myasthenia gravis. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(6):842–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cavalcante P, Marcuzzo S, Franzi S, Galbardi B, Maggi L, Motta T, Ghislandi R, Buzzi A, Spinelli L, Novellino L, Baggi F, Antozzi C, Conforti F, De Pas TM, Barberis M, Bernasconi P, Mantegazza R. Epstein-Barr virus in tumor-infiltrating B cells of myasthenia gravis thymoma: an innocent bystander or an autoimmunity mediator? Oncotarget 2017, 8, (56), 95432–95449.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me during the writing of this article. A special acknowledgment should be shown to my tutor, Professor Chen. Finally, I wish to extend my thanks to the library assistants who supplied me with technical assistance and advice.

Funding

This study was supported by the Sub-project 973 of the Ministry of Science and Technology (KGF15206/009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GC contributed to the conception of the study; LZ performed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. JD contributed significantly to manuscript preparation; YT and KZ helped to perform the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors have read and approved the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital affiliated with Fudan University(Y2019-106). The verbal consent on phone consent was obtained from the studied patients.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing Interest

The authors declared that they had no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Ding, JY., Tao, YL. et al. Detection of Epstein–Barr virus infection in thymic epithelial tumors by nested PCR and Epstein–Barr-encoded RNA ISH. Infect Agents Cancer 18, 37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00497-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00497-9

Keywords