Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Lactobacillus crispatus M247 oral administration: Is it really an effective strategy in the management of papillomavirus-infected women?

Infectious Agents and Cancer volume 17, Article number: 53 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have shown the importance of the microbiota in women's health. Indeed, the persistence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-related lesions in patients with dysbiosis can be the antechamber to cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long term administration of oral Lactobacillus crispatus can restore eubiosis in women with HPV infections and hence achieve viral clearance.

Methods

In total, 160 women affected by HPV infections were enrolled at the Department of Gynecological Obstetrics of “San Paolo” Hospital, Italy between February 2021 and February 2022. The women were randomly assigned to two groups, one in treatment with oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 (group 1, n = 80) versus the control group, that hence only in follow-up (Group 2, n = 80).

Results

After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 10–30 months), the likelihood of resolving HPV-related cytological anomalies was higher in patients in treatment with the long term oral probiotic (group 1) versus the group that perfom only follow-up (group 2) (60.5% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.05). Total HPV clearance was shown in 9.3% of patients undergoing only follow-up compared to 15.3% of patients in the group taking long term oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 (p = 0.34). However, the percentage of HPV-negative patients, assessed with the HPV-DNA test, documented at the end of the study period was not significantly different from the control group.

Conclusions

Despite the limitations of our analysis, we found a higher percentage of clearance of PAP-smear abnormalities in patients who took long term oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 than in the control group. Larger studies are warranted, but we believe that future research should be aimed in this direction.

Trial registration This study is retrospectively registered.

Introduction

The vaginal microbiota in healthy women (eubiosis) contains a diversity of anaerobic and aerobic microorganisms. Lactobacilli are the most common, principal subpopulation. In selected situations, this balance can deteriorate (dysbiosis) and other pathogens may develop, decreasing the host anti-bacterial defenses [1]. The loss of this balance can lead, depending on several factors (hormonal levels, host defenses, sexual practices), to the onset of vaginosis, making the subject more susceptible to sexually transmitted diseases. Indeed, the maintenance of a healthy vaginal environment could be protective against infections [2]. The most common microbial species that populate the vagina (such as Lactobacilli) are the main protagonists in this process. Lactobacilli produce antimicrobial compounds (hydrogen peroxide, lactic acid, bacteriocin-like substances) and compete for adhesion sites in the vagina with other pathogens [3]. For this reason, a relationship between long lasting dysbiosis and cancer progression has been observed [4]. Indeed, through the elevation of pH, vaginal dysbiosis could promote cervical Human Papilloma virus (HPV)-related alterations and thus precancerous lesions progression [5]. HPV infection is among the most diffuse sexually transmitted infections in the world, with the highest incidence among young women, and has been recognized as the principal reason for the onset of cervical cancer [6]. The synergistic effects of persistent high-risk HPV infection, changes in the cervical microenvironment, and other carcinogenic factors (smoking, sexual propinquity) could favor the development of cervical precancerous lesions [7]. It appears that the composition of the microbiota may play a key role in conditioning individual susceptibility to infection and viral progression [8] (Fig. 1). Increasing attention is being devoted to probiotics, since they could promote women’s well-being by restoring the microbiota [9]. The aim of our analysis was to examine whether oral long term administration of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 in patients with HPV infections could restore eubiosis and consequently achieve viral infection control [10, 11]. The oral use of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 in order to modify the microbiota and increase HPV clearance, was recently evaluated [12]. Lactobacillus crispatus M247 is a tested probiotic for oral administration shown to have fecal and vaginal colonizing properties [13, 14]. We administered this strain in a preliminary, longitudinal, controlled, open study enrolling HPV-positive women, to assess its possible impact in terms of both the microbiota and of HPV status. The aim of this study was to assess the possible impact of oral long-term administration of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 on cervical cytology and the persistence of HPV infection. According to our experience, albeit partial, oral administration of the Lactobacillus crispatus M247 strain is a safe treatment and has a real potential to achieve the regression of PAP-smear alterations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Vaginal microbiota and correlation with risk of cervical dysplasia. NILM negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, LSIL low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, CC cervical cancer

Full size image

Why was Lactobacillus crispatus M247 chosen for this study?

Lactobacillus crispatus M247 is a well-documented probiotic for oral administration that demonstrates fecal and vaginal colonizing properties. The rationale for the use of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 in HPV-infected women are the evidences showing that that Lactobacillus crispatus is detected more recurrently in patients without human papillomavirus (HPV) infection [10,11,12,13].

Why did we prefer oral probiotic administration?

The administration of oral lactobacilli is based on the evidence that the intestinal and vaginal microbiota are linked, and that most vaginal dysbiosis may originate at the intestinal level [15,16,17]. Particularly, two recent studies investigated the relationship between the gut microbiome and cervical cancer [17]. Wang et al. compared the gut microbiome between eight women with cervical cancer and five healthy women [17]. Patients with cervical cancer showed a higher gut microbiota diversity, although this difference was not statistically significant [17]. However, in a larger examination of the gut microbiome in cervical cancer patients versus women without cervical cancer, our group observed a statistically significant higher diversity in cervical cancer patients than in healthy controls [18]. Moreover, literature reports have described significant differences in several taxa between cervical cancer patients and controls, predominantly superior numbers of members of the Proteobacteria phylum in women with cervical cancer [19]. Different studies reported distinct taxonomic abundance profiles between cervical cancer patients and the control group [18]. The intestinal microbiome is strongly conditioned by diet, as well as by individual factors. Therefore, Sims et al. concluded that since cervical HPV lesions are associated with vaginal and gut microbiota [20], oral probiotic treatment could modulate both microbiotas, reducing HPV lesions [20]. The use of oral Lactobacillus crispatus promotes colonization in the intestine that, in a few days [20] allows the transfer of lactobacilli into the vagina. This creates an intestinal reservoir of Lactobacillus crispatus that feeds the vaginal compartment even when the probiotic is no longer taken for a few weeks/months, which would not be possible after only topical application of the product. Thanks to the adhesion properties of Lactobacillus crispatus M247, this probiotic can long remain within intestinal and vaginal cells [21].

Materials and methods

This is a pilot study, performed between February 2021 and February 2022 at the Department of Gynecological Obstetrics “San Paolo “of Bari. The initial study group included 205 sexually active women, aged between 30 and 64 years old, with a Papanicolaou test reporting low-grade cervical cytology in the form of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (L-SIL) and with positive HPV-DNA test. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy or breastfeeding, CIN2–3, immunological diseases or corticosteroid treatment, severe comorbidities. Patients were enrolled after a detailed explanation of the study aims, and underwent routine follow-up. Of the 205 patients selected according to the inclusion criteria, 160 women finally took part; features of the enrolled patients are summarized in Table 1. Each woman gave written informed consent to take part in the study and to publication of the results and completed all the necessary paperwork related to privacy. All women's data were completely anonymized, and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were randomized to two groups. Group 1 (n = 80) underwent oral treatment with Lactobacillus crispatus for 12 months (range 9–14 months). Group 2 (n = 80) constituted the control group that undergoing only routine follow-up every six months. The wet mount microscopy, PAP-smear and colposcopy were performed for every enrolled patient every 6 months, while the HPV-DNA test was repeated after 12 months. As literature reported, wet mount microscopy reflects the functional vaginal lactobacillary flora better than the Gram stain [11]. Lactobacillary grades (according to Donders' score), signs of bacteria, and presence of potential microbial balance alteration were documented [11]. In cases of infection, standard antibiotic or antifungal therapy was administered and at the end of therapy the bacteriological examination was repeated. Only after eradicating the infection were PAP smears performed. In addition, assessment of pH was made with the Litmus paper test. PAP-smears were assessed by expert pathologists by means of the three-tiered cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) classification and employing Bethesda terminology [9]. An adequate smear was defined as a sample with an adequate number of squamous cells, noting any evidence of transformation zone. Colposcopy assessment was executed employing the terminology presented by the Nomenclature Committee of International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy in 2011 [12], identifying as Grade 1 (minor changes) the existence of a fine mosaic, fine punctate, a thin aceto-white epithelium, or an irregular geographic border and as Grade 2 (major changes) the presence of a sharp border, an inner border sign, a ridge sign, a dense aceto-white epithelium, coarse mosaic/punctate, or cuffed crypt openings. Atypical vessels or other suspicious signs of invasion (such as fragile vessels, irregular surface, exophytic lesions, necrosis, ulceration, tumor, or gross neoplasm) were included under Grade 2. The squamo-columnar junction visibility was classified as completely visible or non-completely visible. The transformation zone type was distinguished as type 1 and 2 (completely visible) or type 3 (not fully visible). The lesion position was described as: a) ectocervical (if the lesion was only present on ectocervical biopsy), endocervical (if the lesion was present on endocervical curettage), or ectocervical and endocervical (if the lesion was present on both).

Table 1 Features of HPV-positive patients enrolled in the randomized study
Full size table

Pap test, HPV DNA test

The Pap test was executed by collecting exo- and endocervical cells by means of an Ayre spatula and a cytobrush. The cells were successively streaked on a glass slide and spray fixed. Smears were classified according to the 2014 Bethesda System [22]. The test was carried out with a validated method for screening COBAS 4800 HPV-Test Real-Time PCR that detects the strains: HPV-HR16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68. In each report it was specified that the finding of a positive test is an indication of the presence of the virus in the sample examined, but not in itself a diagnosis of disease [23].

Statistical analysis

In total, 160 women aged between 30 and 65 years, with low-grade cervical cytology in the form of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (L-SIL), or with a negative PAP-smear but positive HPV-DNA test for HPV infection, were selected for this study. For each patient the following parameters were recorded.

Bacteriological examination every 6 months, PAP-smear and colposcopy every 6 months, HPV-DNA-test every 12 months. The collected data were inserted into an Excel database (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) and subjected to Least Significant Difference Testing, set at p ≤ 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the PlotIT program Ver. 3.2 (Scientific Programming Enterprises, Haslett, MI, USA).

Adherence to therapy, tolerability, and treatment side effects

Patients referred a greater than 98% adherence to therapy; they declared that the treatment was well tolerated, with no significant side effects. Only nausea was reported by 2 patients, that reported taking it in the morning, so we suggested taking it before meals and the disorder subsided.

Tested product

The probiotic product used in our clinical study was Crispact® sachets. Each sachet contains no fewer than 20 billion colony forming units of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 (lMG-P-23257) The product is manufactured by Alfa Omega (Copparo, Ferrara, Italy) and traded by Pharmextracta SpA (Pontenure, Piacenza, Italy). The product was notified to the Italian Health Authorities in 2019 (March 1st) with notification number 115450.

Results

In total, 160 women were included in the study. Each patient underwent fresh bacteriology (wet mount vaginal bacteriology) testing before the PAP test; signs of infection was elicited in 25% of group 1 patients (13% bacterial, 12% mycotic vaginosis) and 18.4% of Group 2 patients (bacterial 12% and 6.4% mycotic vaginosis). Moreover, 95% of patients with vaginosis in group 1 and 98% in group 2 also referred intestinal disturbances (irritable colon, colitis). Vaginosis was identified following Amsel criteria [14] and by the presence of a vaginal discharge together with distinctive symptomsPatients with concomitant infections in both groups were treated by standard therapy for infections, and only after therapy and a repeated negative bacteriological examination was the Pap-test performed, in order to reduce the potential interference of infections on the reading of the pap-test. Pap smear abnormalities were associated with HPV DNA positivity in 73.5 in group 1 and 75.8% of cases in group 2. Patients were sequentially randomized to two groups, as previously explained (Group 1, n = 80 and Group 2, n = 80). Compliance was very good, and all participants returned for all follow-up visits. Median follow-up time was 12 months (range 9–14 months); first follow-up was after six months. At six months, there were no statistically significant changes on cytological and HPV test results between the two groups: remission rates of HPV lesions were (Group 1 = 20%, and Group 2 = 18%). At the end of the study period, the likelihood of resolving HPV-related cytological anomalies was statistically significantly higher in Lactobacillus crispatus M247 long-term oral users (61.5 vs. 41.3%, p = 0.041) (Group 1, n = 80) versus the control group. (Group 2, n = 80). The most common HPV genotype was type 16, found in 27.6% of positives, followed by type 51, 45 and 35 (17.1%), type 18 and 52 (16.1%) and type 68 (14.0%). HPV genotype 66 was found in 12.3% and 58 (9.5%) of positives.

However, HPV-DNA negativity documented at the end of the study period, after a median follow-up of 12 months (range 9–14 months), was not significantly different (p = 0.034) in patients with only follow-up (9.3%) as compared to patients who took long term oral Lactobacilli (15.3%).

Discussion

Cervical cancer is the most common neoplasia among patients in developing countries and the second most frequent female cancer worldwide [24]. Frequently, it develops through a sequence of premalignant lesions, described as different grades of CIN 1, 2 and 3 [22]; just a few women with CIN lesions undergo progression to invasive cancer. Moreover, although HPV is widespread, literature reports show that only a small number of women have a recurrent HPV infection and subsequently develop precancerous lesions [25]. Indeed, several studies have described spontaneous HPV clearance, estimated at approximately 20–30% of cases at three months, almost 50% at six months, and nearly 60–70% at one year [26]. Consequently, several studies report that over 90% of HPV infections and infection-induced lesions are transitory and resolve spontaneously [27]. The ability of each organism to eliminate the virus may depend on several factors, among which concomitant vaginal infections, a local microflora imbalance and immune response defects seem to be decisive [6]. The role of chronic inflammation due to vaginal infections and the development of pre-cancerous lesions was recently profusely debated in literature as a risk factor for cervical dysplasia [28, 29]. Indeed, it was demonstrated that the vaginal microbiota can play a crucial role in the maintenance of vaginal homeostasis, with a protective role against fungal, protozoal, bacterial and viral infections. A defensive action has also been found against the human papillomavirus. A healthy vaginal ecosystem is characterized by lactobacilli, that could modulate the local immune system and inflammation response [30], being able to control cell proliferation/apoptosis [10]. Indeed, hydrogen peroxide, lactate and bacteriocins released by lactobacilli could inhibit pathogens overgrowth in the whole urogenital tract, offering a vital support in achieving good reproductive and general health in women [31,32,33]. Therefore, the support of lactobacilli taken orally can help to restore the endogenous balance and strengthen the defenses against HPV, facilitating its clearance [33,34,35]. Other studies evaluated the role of oral probiotics in patients with HPV infection. An important bias of these experience was the enrollment of only women with a concomitant infection in course. The execution of pap-smears in women with infection could be unreliable since the criteria for an optimal cytology evaluation also include the absence of inflammation [35,36,37,38]. Moreover, interestingly, women who had vaginosis had an associated chronic intestinal disease. This confirms the choice to administer oral lactobacilli, since the intestinal and vaginal microbiota are linked. Therefore, it would be useful to create a multidisciplinary equipe (made up of Gastroenterologists, Nutritionists and Gynecologists) to find a balance of these different aspects, restoring vaginal and intestinal eubiosis. Moreover, in the literature there is evidence of the impact of diet on the microbiota [29, 39,40,41,42]. However, to our knowledge, no study has yet correlated a balanced diet with an improved microbiota, making subjects less predisposed to vaginocervical infections. It would be important to test this hypothesis through a personalized, multidisciplinary approach. Moreover, this aspect of the research can be further probed through the study of HPV genotype. Indeed, in the present study HPV genotype are assess through the use of DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in L1 region and reverse hybridization.

The incidence of HPV could vary by country [43]. Particularly, our study was conducted in reference center for the screening of cervico-carcinoma located in Puglia. In our territory there is a clear prevalence of some genotypes in particular (16, 31, 45 and 51) [43]. The present study revealed that HPV 16, followed by genotypes 51, 35, 45 were the most persistent. These results are different from the others of previous studies, which report a greater persistence of HPV 16 and 18 [44]. Furthermore, the evaluation of demographic-behavioral characteristics in association with HPV clearance would require a multivariate statistical analysis that could be pursued in the future, favoring the identification of a targeted and personalized treatment [45].

Indeed, even if the effectiveness of vaginal lactobacilli appears limited, the concomitant use of oral and vaginal lactobacilli could be considered to potentially obtain HPV negativity in less time and probably also to reduce recurrences [46, 47]. Consequently, further studies are warranted, comparing several arms, and with the concomitant use of oral and vaginal probiotics.

Limitation of study

The results of our study appear to encourage the use of probiotics in patients with low-grade HPV lesions. Therefore, our data must be carefully evaluated, since in the HPV natural history, 60–70% of patients undergo spontaneous regression within 12 months [23]. Consequently, it is difficult to assess whether PAP-smear negativization was linked to the oral probiotics treatment or to the described high incidence of spontaneous viral clearance in low grade lesions. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the HPV test result between the two groups after 12 months. Based on our study results, we may state that oral long-term administration of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 could improve the microbiota and consequently the cytology, while the efficacy on definitive viral clearance, demonstrated with the HPV test, has still to be fully explored. Therefore, even if the data are encouraging, further studies of larger samples are warranted to verify the effectiveness of long term therapy with a probiotic, such as the analysis of microbiota community state types. Moreover, in cases of persistence, the viral strain could be evaluated by viral genotyping.

Conclusion

In this study, long term administration of oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 showed a potential effect on resolving cervical abnormalities, through restoring the physiological vaginal balance. Indeed, the high percentage of clearance of PAP-smear abnormalities obtained with oral Lactobacillus crispatus M247 long term administration offers encouraging evidence. For further confirmation, a metagenomics analysis of the vaginal, cervical, and intestinal microbiota in HPV infected women should be executed. Consequently, our experience could be a starting point for further discussions on this topic.

Availability of data and materials

All the data in the manuscript have been archived and are available through the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

ASCUS:

Atypical undetermined significance

L-SIL:

Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

H-SIL:

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

CIN:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

References

  1. Aroutcheva A, Gariti D, Simon M, Shott S, Faro J, Simoes JA, Gurguis A, Faro S. Defense factors of vaginal lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conti C, Malacrino C, Mastromarino P. Inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 2 by vaginal lactobacilli. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60:19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matu MN, Orinda GO, Njagi ENM, Cohen CR, Bukusi EA. Vitro inhibitory activity of human vaginal lactobacilli against pathogenic bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis in Kenyan women. Anaerobe. 2010;16:210–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke MA, Rodriguez AC, Gage JC, et al. A large, population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and human papillomavirus infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JE, Lee S, Lee H, et al. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, De Sutter P, Temmerman M, Vanden BD. Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Spurbeck RR, Arvidson CG. Lactobacilli at the front line of defense against vaginally acquired infections. Fut Microbiol. 2011;6:567–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jespers V, van de Wijgert J, Cools P, et al. Vaginal biomarkers study group. The significance of Lactobacillus crispatus and L. vaginalis for vaginal health and the negative effect of recent sex: a cross-sectional descriptive study across groups of African women. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Iyer C, Kosters A, Sethi G, Kunnumakkara AB, Aggarwal BB, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri promotes TNF-induced apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia-derived cells by modulation of NF-kappaB and MAPK signalling. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:1442–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Donders GG, Vereecken A, Salembier G, Van Bulck B, Spitz B. Assessment of vaginal lactobacillary flora in wet mount and fresh or delayed gram’s stain. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(1):2–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, Perrotta M, Prendiville W, Russell P, Sideri M, Strander B, Tatti S, Torne A, Walker P. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DiPierro F, Bertuccioli A, Sagheddu V, Cattivelli D, Soldi S, Elli M. Antibiotic resistance profile and adhesion properties of Lactobacillus crispatus M247. Nutrafoods. 2019;2:89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, Bennett PR, Kyrgiou M. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome. 2016;4:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Woese CR, Fox GE. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5088–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, Bennett PR, Kyrgiou M. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome. 2016;4(1):58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhao J, et al. Altered diversity and composition of the gut microbiome in patients with cervical cancer. AMB Express. 2019;9:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sims TT, Colbert LE, Zheng J, et al. Gut microbial diversity and genus-level differences identified in cervical cancer patients versus healthy controls. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155:237–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Colbert LE, Medrano AYD, Mikkelson MD, et al. Clonal expansion of antigen specific T-cells during radiation therapy for HPV associated cervical cancers is regulated by the vaginal microbiome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102:S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dellino M, Gargano G, Tinelli R, Carriero C, Minoia C, Tetania S, Silvestris E, Loizzi V, Paradiso A, Casamassima P, Tufaro A, Cormio G, Garrisi VM. A strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): are HE4 and CA 125 suitable to detect a Paget disease of the vulva? Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(5):e24485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lepargneur JP. Lactobacillus crispatus as bio-marker of the healthy vaginal tract. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2016;74:421–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Pap test and Bethesda 2014. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:271–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ingabire C, Lim MK, Won YJ, Oh JK. Human papillomavirus genotype-specific persistence and potential risk factors among Korean women: results from a 2-year follow-up study. Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):813–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song D, Kong WM, Zhang TQ, Jiao SM, Chen J, Han C, Liu TT. The negative conversion of high-risk human papillomavirus and its performance in surveillance of cervical cancer after treatment: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4197-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodríguez AC, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Hildesheim A, Castle PE, et al. Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste Group. Rapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infections. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:513–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Petry KU, Horn J, Luyten A, Mikolajczyk RT. Punch biopsies shorten time to clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus infections of the uterine cervix. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pendharkar S, Magopane T, Larsson PG, de Bruyn G, Gray GE, Hammarström L, Marcotte H. Identification and characterisation of vaginal lactobacilli from south African women. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Boccardo E, Lepique AP, Villa LL. The role of inflammation in HPV carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1905–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Anukam K, Osazuwa E, Ahonkhai I, et al. Augmentation of antimicrobial metronidazole therapy of bacterial vaginosis with oral probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1450–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma S, Singh RL, Kakkar P. Modulation of Bax/Bcl-2 and caspases by probiotics during acetaminophen induced apoptosis in primary hepatocytes. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:770–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Orlando A, Refolo MG, Messa C, Amati L, Lavermicocca P, Guerra V, Russo F. Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of viable or heat-killed lactobacillus paracasei IMPC2.1 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in HGC-27 gastric and DLD-1 colon cell lines. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64:1103–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buonomo B, Massarotti C, Dellino M, Anserini P, Ferrari A, Campanella M, Magnotti M, De Stefano C, Peccatori FA, Lambertini M. Reproductive issues in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes: an expert meeting. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dellino M, Silvestris E, Loizzi V, Paradiso A, Loiacono R, Minoia C, Daniele A, Cormio G. Germinal ovarian tumors in reproductive age women: fertility-sparing and outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(39):e22146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Silvestris E, Cormio G, Skrypets T, Dellino M, Paradiso AV, Guarini A, Minoia C. Novel aspects on gonadotoxicity and fertility preservation in lymphoproliferative neoplasms. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;151:102981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Silvestris E, Dellino M, Cafforio P, Paradiso AV, Cormio G, D’Oronzo S. Breast cancer: an update on treatment-related infertility. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146(3):647–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Silvestris E, D’Oronzo S, Cafforio P, Kardhashi A, Dellino M, Cormio G. In vitro generation of oocytes from ovarian stem cells (OSCs): in search of major evidence. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6225.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Silvestris E, De Palma G, Canosa S, Palini S, Dellino M, Revelli A, Paradiso AV. Human ovarian cortex biobanking: a fascinating resource for fertility preservation in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9):3245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dellino M, Minoia C, Paradiso AV, De Palo R, Silvestris E. Fertility preservation in cancer patients during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Front Oncol. 2020;4(10):1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang KD, Xu DJ, Wang BY, Yan DH, Lv Z, Su JR. Inhibitory effect of vaginal lactobacillus supernatants on cervical cancer cells. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sakkas H, Bozidis P, Touzios C, Kolios D, Athanasiou G, Athanasopoulou E, Gerou I, Gartzonika C. Nutritional status and the influence of the vegan diet on the gut microbiota and human health. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(2):88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Palma E, Recine N, Domenici L, Giorgini M, Pierangeli A, Panici PB. Long-term Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 application to restore a balanced vaginal ecosystem: a promising solution against HPV-infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Del Prete R, Ronga L, Addati G, Magrone R, Di Carlo D, Miragliotta G. Prevalence, genotype distribution and temporal dynamics of human papillomavirus infection in a population in southern Italy. Infez Med. 2017;25(3):247–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Agarossi A, Ferrazzi E, Parazzini F, Perno CF, Ghisoni L. Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women undergoing voluntary cervical cancer screening in Italy. J Med Virol. 2009;81(3):529–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cascardi E, Cazzato G, Daniele A, Silvestris E, Cormio G, Di Vagno G, Malvasi A, Loizzi V, Scacco S, Pinto V, Cicinelli E, Maiorano E, Ingravallo G, Resta L, Minoia C, Dellino M. Association between cervical microbiota and HPV: could this be the key to complete cervical cancer eradication? Biology (Basel). 2022;11(8):1114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chironna M, Neve A, Sallustio A, De Robertis A, Quarto M, Germinario C, Lepera A, Cicinelli E, Carriero C, Pinto V, Miniello G, Borraccino V, Blasi N, Romano F, Noya E. HPV Study Group. Frequency of human papillomavirus infection and genotype distribution among women with known cytological diagnosis in a Southern Italian region. J Prev Med Hyg. 2010;51(4):139–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dellino M, Cascardi E, Tomasone V, Zaccaro R, Maggipinto K, Giacomino ME, DeNicolò M, De Summa S, et al. Communications is time for care: an Italian monocentric survey on human papillomavirus (HPV) risk information as part of cervical cancer screening. J Pers Med. 2022;12:1387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank our supervisor, Dr. Dellino Donato, for founding the II level HPV screening center at “San Paolo” Hospital of Bari and for offering guidance throughout this manuscript and our personal cultural and professional experience.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Miriam Dellino and Eliano Cascardi have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100, Bari, Italy

    Miriam Dellino, Antonio Malvasi, Alessandro De Luca, Ettore Cicinelli, Carmine Carriero & Vincenzo Pinto

  2. Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “San Paolo” Hospital, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy

    Miriam Dellino, Giovanni Di Vagno, Rosanna Zaccaro, Katia Maggipinto & Marina Vinciguerra

  3. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Eliano Cascardi

  4. Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Italy

    Eliano Cascardi

  5. Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico—Di Cristina—Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy

    Antonio Simone Laganà

  6. Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Gerardo Cazzato

  7. Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Salvatore Scacco

  8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Valle d’Itria” Hospital, Martina Franca, Italy

    Raffaele Tinelli

  9. Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121, Bari, Italy

    Vera Loizzi & Gennaro Cormio

  10. Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy

    Antonella Daniele

  11. Departmental of Cervical-Carcinoma Screening, ASL Bari, 70121, Bari, Italy

    Chiara Antonia Genco

Authors
  1. Miriam Dellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eliano Cascardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Simone Laganà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovanni Di Vagno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonio Malvasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rosanna Zaccaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Katia Maggipinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gerardo Cazzato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Salvatore Scacco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Raffaele Tinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alessandro De Luca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Marina Vinciguerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Vera Loizzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Antonella Daniele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ettore Cicinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Carmine Carriero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Chiara Antonia Genco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Gennaro Cormio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Vincenzo Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MD and EC conceived of the presented idea. ASL, GDV and AM carried out the experiment. RZ, KM, GC, SC, RT, ADL, MV, VL, AD, CC, ACG GC and VP took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Dellino.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was collected from all enrolled patients. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 2013 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

We informed patients about the use of their personal data for scientific purposes, under the protection of the Privacy Act, and they accepted and signed the related informed consent form.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dellino, M., Cascardi, E., Laganà, A.S. et al. Lactobacillus crispatus M247 oral administration: Is it really an effective strategy in the management of papillomavirus-infected women?. Infect Agents Cancer 17, 53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00465-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00465-9

Keywords

  • HPV infection
  • Lactobacillus crispatus M247
  • Probiotics
  • Papillomaviridae
  • Microbiota
  • Uterine cervical neoplasms

Infectious Agents and Cancer

ISSN: 1750-9378

Contact us