Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Hepatitis B and C virus infections and the risk of biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Infectious Agents and Cancer volume 17, Article number: 45 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Both hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, their effect on other hepatobiliary cancers, such as biliary tract cancers (BTCs), is not well established. We aimed to investigate associations between HBV or HCV infection and BTCs risk by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed to identify all relevant articles published before June 9, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The meta-analysis was evaluated by heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment.

Results

In total, 48 articles involving 69,723 cases and 4,047,574 controls were obtained to calculate the associations between HBV or HCV infection and the risk of BTCs. We found that both HBV and HCV infections were associated with the risk of BTCs, with pooled ORs of 2.16 (95% CI 1.73–2.69) and 2.12 (95% CI 1.62–2.77), respectively. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity suggested that HBV infection could increase the risk of BTCs in both Asian (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.76–2.97) and Caucasian (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.18–2.75) populations. In addition, HCV infection resulted in a higher increased risk of BTCs in Caucasian populations than in Asian populations (OR = 3.93 vs. 1.51, P = 0.014). In particular, significantly increased risks of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) were identified in individuals with HBV (OR = 3.96, 95% CI 3.05–5.15) or HCV infection (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 2.07–4.08).

Conclusions

This study suggests that both HBV and HCV infections are risk factors for BTCs, particularly ICC, highlighting the necessity of cancer screening for BTCs in patients with either HBV or HCV infection.

Introduction

Viral hepatitis infections remain a major public health problem worldwide, affecting hundreds of millions of people; an estimated 257 million people are living with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 71 million people are living with hepatitis C virus (HCV) [1]. Most deaths from viral hepatitis have been reported to be due to HBV and HCV infections.

Both HBV and HCV are potential risk factors for liver cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and thyroid cancer [2,3,4,5,6]. Importantly, HBV and HCV might be causal risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HBV was estimated to be the cause of 53% of HCC cases, while HCV was estimated to be the cause of 25% of HCC cases worldwide [7]. However, the relationship between HBV or HCV infections and other hepatobiliary cancers, such as biliary tract cancers (BTCs), remains poorly understood.

Historically, BTCs are classified into cancers of the gallbladder, intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, and ampulla of Vate, which are relatively rare but highly fatal malignancies [8, 9]. Prior studies investigating associations of HBV or HCV infection with BTC risk have yielded inconsistent or inconclusive results [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Several meta-analyses have been performed on this topic; however, these meta-analyses mainly focused on one cancer type or one hepatitis virus type [16,17,18,19]. Research systematically summarizing the relationship between them is lacking. Therefore, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of HBV or HCV infection in the BTCs risk, as well as its subtypes. Furthermore, subgroup analyses by ethnicity were performed since different endemic hepatitis virus types in different regions may determine the diversity of risk factors for BTCs.

Materials and methods

This meta-analysis followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) [20, 21]. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021261784).

Literature search

A comprehensive literature search of related studies was conducted using PubMed (published on or before June 9, 2021) with the keywords “hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus or HBV or HCV” and “cholangiocarcinoma or CCA or ECC or ICC or bile duct cancer or bile duct carcinoma or biliary tract cancer or gallbladder cancer or gallbladder neoplasm” as query terms. The titles and abstracts of the studies, or full texts if necessary, were reviewed to identify all relevant publications. Additionally, the reference lists of all included studies were manually reviewed, as were references from reviews and meta-analyses of relevant potential studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for studies investigating the associations between HBV or HCV infections and the BTCs risk were as follows: (1) a case‒control or cohort study design; (2) exposure to HBV or HCV infection (with serum HBsAg and hepatitis C antibody used as the positive markers of hepatitis virus infection); (3) the outcome of interest was BTC, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC) (the outcome was defined according to reports in the original papers); (4) risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or data to calculate them were provided; and (5) publication in English. Abstracts, reviews, letters, case reports and studies that did not provide sufficient data to calculate risk estimates were excluded. Two investigators independently selected studies, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Data extraction

The following information was extracted from each study: first author, year of publication, country, ethnicity, cancer type, study design, source population, numbers of cases and controls, odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and corresponding 95% CIs, adjustments, sample sizes and follow-up years (only for cohort studies).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with Stata version 15 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA), and two-sided P values less than 0.05 (bold values) were considered significant unless otherwise stated. Associations between hepatitis virus infection and BTC risk were evaluated by ORs and corresponding 95% CIs using a random effects model (DerSimonian Laird). The significance of the overall OR was determined by the Z-test.

The meta-analysis was evaluated by heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment. Statistical heterogeneity among the studies was assessed by the Cochran Q statistic (P values less than 0.10 were considered indicative of statistically significant heterogeneity) and I2 statistic (I2 values less than 25% represented mild heterogeneity, values between 25 and 50% represented moderate heterogeneity, and values greater than 50% represented large heterogeneity). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted by ethnicity and study design to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. In addition, sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the influences of single studies on the overall risk estimate by removing one study at a time. Potential publication bias was evaluated using both Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test, and P values less than 0.10 were considered to be statistically significant [22, 23].

Results

Literature search results and study characteristics

The literature search and selection process is summarized in Fig. 1. The comprehensive search strategy generated 676 potentially relevant studies, 88 of which were considered of potential value, and their full texts were retrieved for detailed evaluation. Furthermore, 21 studies were subsequently excluded, and two additional studies were included from the references reviewed. Finally, 48 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in our meta-analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The literature search flow chart

Full size image

The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1. Forty-eight studies investigated associations between HBV or HCV infections and the BTCs risk; of these studies, 25 studies were conducted in China, 11 in the United States, six in Korea, two in Thailand, two in Japan, one in Europe, and one in Italy. Specifically, 44 studies involving 54,521 cases and 3,733,577 controls explored the association between HBV infection and BTCs risk, and 32 studies with a total of 44,749 cases and 1,947,161 controls estimated the association between HCV infection and BTCs risk.

HBV infection and the risk of BTC

The HBV infection and BTCs risk results are shown in Fig. 2. We found a positive association between HBV infection and BTCs risk (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.73–2.69). Furthermore, we analyzed the role of HBV infection in the subtypes of BTC. The results showed that HBV infection could increase the risk of GBC (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.00–1.94) and CCA (OR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.80–2.99). In addition, HBV infection was associated with increased risks of ICC (OR = 3.96, 95% CI 3.05–5.15) and ECC (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.25–1.92).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plots of association between hepatitis B virus infection and biliary tract cancer risk

Full size image

Importantly, subgroup analyses by ethnicity suggested that HBV infection could increase the risk of BTCs in both Asian (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.76–2.97) and Caucasian (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.18–2.75) populations. Otherwise, HBV infection was associated with an increased risk of CCA in Asian populations, with a pooled OR of 2.48 (95% CI 1.81–3.38), and the pooled OR was 2.01 (95% CI 1.43–2.84) in Caucasian populations. In addition, we found that HBV infection could increase the risk of ICC (OR = 4.65, 95% CI 3.44–6.29) and ECC (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.26–2.05) in Asian populations. However, no association was observed between HBV infection and ECC in Caucasian populations.

HCV infection and the risk of BTC

A significant association was found between HCV infection and BTCs risk (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.62–2.77) (Fig. 3). The results of our meta-analysis also showed that HCV infection could increase the risk of CCA (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.58–2.78), including both ICC (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 2.07–4.08) and ECC (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.14–2.23). However, no association was observed between HBV infection and GBC (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.79–2.84).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plots of association between hepatitis C virus infection and biliary tract cancer risk

Full size image

Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed that HCV infection could increase the risk of BTCs in both Asian (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.92) and Caucasian (OR = 3.93, 95% CI 2.70–5.73) populations. In addition, HCV infection was associated with an increased risk of CCA (Caucasian populations: OR = 4.19, 95% CI 2.93–5.98; Asian populations: OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.04–1.50), especially ICC (Caucasian populations: OR = 4.54, 95% CI 3.38–6.11; Asian populations: OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.18–3.18) in these two populations. However, an increased risk of ECC with HCV infection was observed only in Caucasian populations (OR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.80–4.42) and not in Asian populations (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.79–1.67).

Heterogeneity and meta-regression analyses

Large heterogeneity was found in our study, and therefore, both subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted by ethnicity and study design to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (Table 1). We found that only ethnicity was a significant source of heterogeneity for the association between HCV infection and BTCs risk (P = 0.014), CCA (P = 0.005), including ICC (P = 0.019) and ECC (P = 0.025). Ethnicity could explain 18% of the heterogeneity in the HCV infection–BTCs risk association, 26% of the heterogeneity in the HCV infection–CCA risk association, 46% of the heterogeneity in the HCV infection–ICC risk association, and 35% of the heterogeneity in the HCV infection–ECC risk association.

Table 1 Meta-regression analysis
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the results, and we found that removing a single study could not significantly change the pooled ORs and 95% CIs (data not shown), indicating that any single study had little impact on the overall ORs. In addition, the funnel plot appeared generally symmetrical (Additional file 1: Figs. S1, S2), and no significant publication bias was detected using either Begg’s test or Egger’s test in our study (P > 0.1 in all the analyses, except for the associations between HBV and BTC risk and HBV and CCA risk).

Discussion

Our study included 44 case‒control studies and four cohort studies exploring the associations between HBV infection and BTCs risk with a total of 54,521 cases and 3,733,577 controls and between HCV infection and BTCs risk in 44,749 cases and 1,947,161 controls. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis estimating the relationship between HBV or HCV infection and BTCs to date. The results showed that both HBV and HCV infections are risk factors for BTCs, highlighting the necessity of cancer screening for BTCs in individuals with HBV or HCV infection.

The present study found that compared with individuals with non-HBV infections, patients with HBV infection were associated with a 2.16-fold increased risk of BTCs. In particular, HBV infection was associated with approximately 1.39- to 3.96-fold higher risks of BTCs (GBC: 1.39, ICC: 3.96, and ECC: 1.55, respectively). In addition, patients with HCV infection had an approximately 2.12-fold increased risk of BTCs, with a 2.90-fold increased risk of ICC and a 1.60-fold increased risk of ECC. However, no evidence of an association between HCV infection and GBC was found. These results suggest the importance of considering ICC and ECC separately since both HBV and HCV infections have a higher risk of ICC than ECC. In addition, these findings highlight aetiologic heterogeneity across BTCs, and the disparity might be explained by the different anatomic locations. Both HBV and HCV prefer to replicate in hepatocytes, which could lead to liver cirrhosis and HCC [24]. Since hepatocytes and cholangiocytes differentiate from a common hepatic progenitor cell, both HBV and HCV can be postulated to induce carcinogenesis of CCA through a similar mechanism as in HCC [25, 26].

Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed that both Causation and Asian populations had comparably higher increased risks of BTCs with HBV infection (OR: 2.29 vs. 1.80, P = 0.186), whereas HCV infection was associated with a higher increased risk of BTCs in Causation populations than in Asian populations (OR: 3.93 vs. 1.51, P = 0.014). HBV infection, but not HCV infection, was reported to be associated with BTC in some Asian countries, such as China, where HBV infection is highly endemic [26,27,28]. However, HCV-related ICC was more likely to occur in regions where HCV was highly endemic, such as Western countries, the United States and Japan [29,30,31]. These results indicated that different endemic hepatitis virus types in different regions may determine the diversity of risk factors for BTCs.

The pathogenesis of HBV and HCV infections in BTC development has not yet been clarified. HBV x protein, which is encoded by the HBV x gene, is well known as the major causative factor for hepatocarcinogenesis [32,33,34,35]. Long-term high expression of several viral oncoproteins, mostly the HBV x protein and HCV core protein, may be involved in the tumorigenic process [32, 36]. On the other hand, HCV C protein, which is encoded by the HCV core gene, was reported to have a critical role in the invasion and metastasis of CCA by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in a CCA cell line [37]. In addition, persistent chronic inflammation of biliary epithelia caused by chronic HBV or HCV infection is probably involved in cholangiocarcinogenesis [38, 39].

However, several limitations in this meta-analysis should be considered. First, we did not search for carcinoma of Vaters Ampulla (AVC) in the literature since cancers arising from the ampulla of Vater are sometimes included under the term BTCs. Histologically, such cancers can be pancreatobiliary, intestinal, or mixed tumours and account for only 0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers [40]. In addition, fewer studies reported this cancer alone. Second, the included studies were all observational studies, which might introduce selection and recall biases. Third, in different studies, the definitions of the outcomes were usually different (such as histological diagnosis, ICD-9, or ICD-10), which might have implications for pooled estimates. Fourth, significant heterogeneity was observed in our meta-analyses, which lowers the reliability of the overall ORs, although subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity; however, only ethnicity could explain part of the heterogeneity. Fifth, although we extracted the most fully adjusted risk estimates, adjusted confounders varied among the included studies, and some potential confounding factors (such as age, sex, race, smoking status, and alcohol consumption) may influence the relationship between hepatitis virus infection and BTCs risk. Finally, potential publication bias was observed in our study, often because studies with positive results were more likely to be published than studies with negative results.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that both HBV and HCV infections are risk factors for BTCs, especially ICC. Furthermore, we found that both Asian and Causation populations have comparably higher risks of HBV-related BTCs, whereas Causation populations have a higher risk of HCV-related BTCs. Findings from our study suggest an important role of hepatitis virus infection in the pathogenesis of BTCs, highlighting the necessity of cancer screening for BTCs in individuals with HBV or HCV infection.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AVC:

Carcinoma of Vaters Ampulla

BTCs:

Biliary Tract Cancers

CCA:

Cholangiocarcinoma

CI:

Confidence interval

ECC:

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

ICC:

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

GBC:

Gallbladder cancer

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Lanini S, Ustianowski A, Pisapia R, Zumla A, Ippolito G. Viral hepatitis: etiology, epidemiology, transmission, diagnostics, treatment, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2019;33(4):1045–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maucort-Boulch D, de Martel C, Franceschi S, Plummer M. Fraction and incidence of liver cancer attributable to hepatitis B and C viruses worldwide. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(12):2471–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassig BA, Willhauck-Fleckenstein M, Shu XO, Koh WP, Gao YT, Purdue MP, et al. Serologic markers of viral infection and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a pooled study of three prospective cohorts in China and Singapore. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(3):570–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li M, Gan Y, Fan C, Yuan H, Zhang X, Shen Y, et al. Hepatitis B virus and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an updated meta-analysis of 58 studies. J Viral Hepat. 2018;25(8):894–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Li W. Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of multiple myeloma: evidence from a meta-analysis based on 17 case-control studies. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(12):1151–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang P, Jing Z, Liu C, Xu M, Wang P, Wang X, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017;18(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hepatitis B vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2004;79(28):255–63.

  8. Chan E, Berlin J. Biliary tract cancers: understudied and poorly understood. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(16):1845–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh DY, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):428–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian T, Song C, Jiang L, Dai J, Lin Y, Xu X, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and the risk of cancer among the Chinese population. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(11):3075–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiong J, Wang Y, Chen G, Jin L. Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gallbladder cancer: a hospital-based case-control study. Gut. 2020;69(12):2265–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou Z, Nie SD, Jiang B, Wang J, Lv P. Risk factors for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study in China. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2019;28(4):254–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong J, Lu X, Xu W, Bai Y, Huang H, Bian J, et al. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a hospital-based case-control study in China. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:3849–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng YC, Lin CL, Hsu WY, Chow WK, Lee SW, Yeh HZ, et al. Association between cholangiocarcinoma and proton pump inhibitors use: a nested case-control study. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahale P, Engels EA, Koshiol J. Hepatitis B virus infection and the risk of cancer in the elderly US population. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(3):431–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li M, Li J, Li P, Li H, Su T, Zhu R, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection increases the risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(10):1561–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H, Zhu B, Zhang H, Liang J, Zeng W. HBV infection status and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma in Asia: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3417976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H, Hu B, Zhou ZQ, Guan J, Zhang ZY, Zhou GW. Hepatitis C virus infection and the risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 case-control studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Huang J, Wu L, Xu D, et al. Hepatitis viruses infection and risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ringelhan M, McKeating JA, Protzer U. Viral hepatitis and liver cancer. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2017;372(1732):20160274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou H, Wang H, Zhou D, Wang H, Wang Q, Zou S, et al. Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma may hold common disease process for carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(6):1056–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tao LY, He XD, Qu Q, Cai L, Liu W, Zhou L, et al. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study in China. Liver Int. 2010;30(2):215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsing AW, Zhang M, Rashid A, McGlynn KA, Wang BS, Niwa S, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection and the risk of biliary tract cancer: a population-based study in China. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(8):1849–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee BS, Park EC, Park SW, Nam CM, Roh J. Hepatitis B virus infection, diabetes mellitus, and their synergism for cholangiocarcinoma development: a case-control study in Korea. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(2):502–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, Zeuzem S, El-Serag HB, Davila JA, McGlynn KA. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of primary liver cancer in the United States: a study in the SEER-Medicare database. Hepatology. 2011;54(2):463–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamamoto S, Kubo S, Hai S, Uenishi T, Yamamoto T, Shuto T, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection as a likely etiology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2004;95(7):592–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Donato F, Gelatti U, Tagger A, Favret M, Ribero ML, Callea F, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatitis C and B virus infection, alcohol intake, and hepatolithiasis: a case-control study in Italy. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(10):959–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami S. Hepatitis B virus X protein: a multifunctional viral regulator. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36(10):651–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sze KM, Chu GK, Lee JM, Ng IO. C-terminal truncated hepatitis B virus x protein is associated with metastasis and enhances invasiveness by C-Jun/matrix metalloproteinase protein 10 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;57(1):131–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu HB, Qian ZY, Wang BS, Tong SX. Detection of markers of hepatitis viral infection in the tissue of bile duct carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121(12):1143–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang WL, Gu GY, Hu M. Expression and significance of HBV genes and their antigens in human primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 1998;4(5):392–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Einav S, Sklan EH, Moon HM, Gehrig E, Liu P, Hao Y, et al. The nucleotide binding motif of hepatitis C virus NS4B can mediate cellular transformation and tumor formation without Ha-ras co-transfection. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):827–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Li T, Li D, Cheng L, Wu H, Gao Z, Liu Z, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by hepatitis C virus core protein in cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(7):1937–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fillipowicz EA, Xiao S, Sower LE, Weems J, Payne DA. Detection of HCV in bile duct epithelium by laser capture microdissection (LCM). In Vivo. 2005;19(4):737–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Blechacz B, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 2008;48(1):308–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ang DC, Shia J, Tang LH, Katabi N, Klimstra DS. The utility of immunohistochemistry in subtyping adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(10):1371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903393), Chongqing Natural Science Foundation Program (cstc2020jcyjmsxmX0021), and Chongqing Special Postdoctoral Science Foundation (XmT2018068). The sponsors of this study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the report, or the decision for submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, 621000, China

    Yizhou Wang

  2. Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China

    Ye Yuan & Dongqing Gu

Authors
  1. Yizhou Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ye Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dongqing Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YW and DG contributed to conception and design of the study. YY and YW did the literature search, data extraction and quality assessment. YW and DG did statistical analysis. YW wrote the first draft of the original manuscript with significant contributions from YY and DG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongqing Gu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis. Figure S1. Funnel plot of studies evaluating the association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) and biliary tract cancer risk. (a) HBV and biliary tract cancer, (b) HBV and cholangiocarcinoma, (c) HBV and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, (d) HBV and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma risk. Figure S2. Funnel plot of studies evaluating the association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and biliary tract cancer risk. (a) HCV and biliary tract cancer, (b) HCV and cholangiocarcinoma, (c) HCV and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, (d) HCV and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma risk.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Yuan, Y. & Gu, D. Hepatitis B and C virus infections and the risk of biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Infect Agents Cancer 17, 45 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00457-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00457-9

Keywords

Infectious Agents and Cancer

ISSN: 1750-9378

Contact us