- Open Access
Fear and loathing in the Caribbean: three studies of fear and cancer screening in Brooklyn's immigrant Caribbean subpopulations
Infectious Agents and Cancer volume 4, Article number: S14 (2009)
Anxiety, worry, and fear are among the most common emotional responses to the threat of disease and several studies have linked various fears to cancer preventive and detection behaviors. Cancer-related worry and fears about screening or its consequences are also characteristics that vary across ethnic groups and may be differentially linked to screening outcomes . Limiting the utility of this growing literature are at least two key considerations.
First, little attention has been paid to documenting variation in cancer-related fears among subpopulations of persons of African descent, despite evidence that (a) rates of screening may vary among both male  and female  immigrants from islands in the Caribbean living in the United States and (b) incidence rates for cancers such as those of the prostate may be very high in men from Jamaica , Guadaloupe  and Trinidad and Tobago , as well as in immigrant groups in both the United Kingdom  and United States . Second, findings regarding the relations anxiety, cancer worry, and screening fear hold with screening behavior seen thus far have been inconsistent, in our view because anxieties stemming from different sources have different relations with behavior. In the emotions theory view, understanding the role of fear in health behavior in diverse groups is predicated on understanding the object or source of the fear [9–11] for the simple reason that anxiety motivates avoidance of particular elicitors [10, 12].
Research conducted within the U54 Comprehensive Cancer Partnership between Long Island University and Columbia University has produced several studies documenting differences in breast and prostate cancer screening frequencies among Caribbean subpopulations living in Brooklyn, New York [1, 12, 13]. A major concentration in this program of behavioral research has investigated whether trait anxiety, cancer worry, and screening-related fears vary across Caribbean subpopulations and whether these highly differentiated emotional responses independently predict screening behavior in multivariate models [1, 2, 12–14]. Consistent with theory, we expected that fears pertaining to the screening context (e.g., fear of pain or the psychological implications of certain screens), would predict avoidance of the fear-inducing situation and thus be associated with less frequent screening. Conversely, where fears relate to the disease itself, greater fear should predict more frequent screening.
Because of our overarching interest in the links between cancer and cancer-screening-related fears and cancer screening behaviors among the diverse groups of men and women living in Brooklyn, New York, we combined data from three community-based studies. Although measures and samples varied somewhat across studies, each study investigated the link between emotions and screening outcome in ethnic groups that included immigrants from islands in the Caribbean. Because of our interest in examining differences within traditional racial categories, we used a combination of (a) self-categorization based on a the traditional racial categories offered in the US Census together with (b) information regarding Country of origin. Allowing a combination of self-reported racial categorization (tapping aspects of identity and minority status) in concert with shared birthplace to influence groupings increases the likelihood that participants share cultural and developmental characteristics thought to form part of ethnicity . We distinguished between Black men born in the United States (hereafter, U.S.-born African Americans), and those originating from countries in the English-speaking Caribbean (e.g., Trinidad & Tobago, Jamaica, Barbados). Immigrant and non-immigrant minority groups were contrasted with men self-identifying as "European or White/Non-Hispanic" who were born in the United States (hereafter, U.S.-born European American).
In Study 1, stratified cluster-sampling was used to recruit 1364 women (aged between 50–70 years) from six ethnic groups: US-born African American, US-born European American, immigrants from islands in the English-speaking Caribbean (Jamaica, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago), the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Eastern Europe . In Study 2, 180 US-born African American, US-born European American and immigrant Jamaican men (aged between 40–70 years) were recruited using convenience sampling . In Study 3, 533 men (aged between 45–70 years) from four groups – US-born African American, US-born European American, and immigrant men from Jamaica and from Trinidad and Tobago – were recruited . In each study, participants provided background data, reported on screening history for either breast or prostate cancer, and completed a measure of trait anxiety, cancer worry, and/or screening fears.
As expected, we found differences among groups of African descent from the United States and the Caribbean. Although women from all groups screened at rates below those recommended, data from Study 1 showed that English-speaking Caribbean, Haitian and Dominican women screened less frequently than US-born African Americans and European Americans and that immigrant Eastern European women were also infrequent screeners (see Figure 1). Conversely, however, there were no differences in rates of self-reported prostate screening among men from the English-speaking Caribbean, US-born African Americans, or US-born European Americans in either Study 2 or Study 3. As expected, cancer-related emotional characteristics also varied across subpopulations (see Figure 2). Cancer worry was generally lower among women from the various Caribbean immigrant groups (Study 1) than it was among US-born African Americans or US-born European Americans. Fears regarding screening, however, varied somewhat differently. Fear of screening was higher among US-born African Americans and immigrant men from the English-speaking Caribbean (Studies 2 and 3) than among US-born European Americans. Consistent with the need to carefully measure fear-related constructs in the context of cancer behavior, however, our data also demonstrated that a specific fear related to concerns regarding threats to masculinity in the context of male screening strongly characterized the attitudes of men from the English-speaking Caribbean compared to the views of US-born European and US-born African Americans (Study 2). Finally, a combination of multiple regression and ANOVAs in each study showed that emotional characteristics independently predicted screening, in most cases even when background characteristics were controlled. Across studies, greater cancer worry predicted more frequent screening while fear of screening predicted less frequent screening.
Data from three large-scale studies in Brooklyn, New York suggest that members of immigrant Caribbean subpopulations screen for breast and prostate cancer at very low rates; in most cases lower than those of either US-born African or US-born European Americans. Groups of Caribbean men and women also vary in the emotions they report regarding cancer and the screening process, generally revealing a pattern that is predictive of poorer screening. Coupled with the fact that emotion characteristics predicted screening outcomes even when controlling for other factors, data from these three studies suggest that the emotional responses Caribbean groups place them at risk for poor screening. Interventions that address these responses may offer the prospect of improving screening frequency in these disadvantaged groups.
Consedine NS, Magai C, Neugut AI: The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups. Preventive Medicine. 2004, 38: 64-77. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.030.
Consedine NS, Morgenstern AH, Kudadjie-Gyamfi E, Magai C, Neugut AI: Prostate cancer screening behavior in men from seven ethnic groups: the fear factor. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15 (2): 228-237. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0019.
Magai C, Consedine NS, Conway F, Neugut AI, Culver C: Diversity matters: Unique populations of older women and breast cancer screening. Cancer. 2004, 100 (11): 2300-2307. 10.1002/cncr.20278.
Glover FE, Coffey DS, Douglas LL: The epidemiology of prostate cancer in Jamaica. Journal of Urology. 1998, 159 (6): 1984-1986. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63220-8.
Mallick S, Blanchet P, Multigner L: Prostate cancer incidence in Guadeloupe, a French Caribbean archipelago. European Urology. 2005, 47 (6): 769-772. 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.020.
Bunker CH, Patrick AL, Konety BR: High prevalence of screening-detected prostate cancer among Afro-Caribbeans: The Tobago Prostate Cancer Survey. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2002, 11 (8): 726-729.
Chinegwundoh F, Enver M, Lee A, Nargund V, Oliver T, Ben-Shlomo Y: Risk and presenting features of prostate cancer amongst African-Caribbean, South Asian and European men in North-east London. BJU International. 2006, 98 (6): 1216-1220. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06503.x.
Shelton JB, Barocas DA, Conway F: Prostate-specific antigen screening in a high-risk population: Lessons from the community and how they relate to large-scale population-based studies. Urology. 2005, 65 (5): 931-936. 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.047.
Consedine NS: The health-promoting and health-damaging effects of emotions: the view from developmental functionalism. Handbook of emotions. Edited by: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones J, Barrett LF. 2008, Guilford: New York
Consedine NS, Moscowitz JT: The role of discrete emotions in health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Applied and Preventive Psychology. 2007, 12: 59-75. 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.09.001.
Consedine NS, Krivoshekova YS, Harris CR: Bodily embarrassment and judgment concern as separable factors in the measurement of medical embarrassment: Psychometric development and links to treatment-seeking outcomes. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2007, 12: 439-462. 10.1348/135910706X118747.
Consedine NS, Adjei BA, Ramirez PM, McKiernan J: An object lesson: Differences in source determine the relations that trait anxiety, prostate cancer worry, and fear of screening hold with prostate screening frequency. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2008, 17 (7): 1631-1639. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2538.
Consedine NS, Horton D, Ungar T, Joe A, Ramirez P, Borrell L: Fear, knowledge and efficacy beliefs differentially predict the frequency of DRE versus PSA screening in ethnically diverse samples of older men. American Journal of Men's Health. 2007, 1 (1): 29-43.
Consedine NS, Magai C, Krivoshekova YS, Ryzewicz L, Neugut AI: Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13 (4): 501-510.
Consedine NS, Magai C, Kudadjie-Gyamfi EK, Kaluk Longfellow J, Ungar TM, King AR: Stress versus discrete negative emotions in the prediction of physical complaints: Does predictive utility vary across groups. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2006, 12 (3): 541-557. 10.1037/1099-9809.12.3.541.
The current report was supported by funding from the National Institute of General Medical Science (2SO6 GM54650) and the National Cancer Institute (1P20 CA 91372 & 1 U54 CA 101388) to the tenth (C.M.) and eleventh (A.N.) authors. The authors would like to thank the staff of the U54's Recruitment Core, Jessy Pierre-Louis and Angela Esquilin.
This article has been published as part of Infectious Agents and Cancer. Volume 4 Supplement 1, 2009: Second Annual International African-Caribbean Cancer Consortium Conference. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.infectagentscancer.com/supplements/4/S1.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
NSC and CM was involved in study design, analysis, interpretation/write up and critical revision of the manuscript.
BA and DH in the analysis, interpretation and write up. AKJ, TU and LNB were involved in the interpretation and write up. PMR was part of the study design, analysis and interpretation/write up. JMM and AIN had part in the study design, analysis and critical revision whilst JSJ took part in critical revision.