Skip to main content
Download PDF

High serum levels of soluble CD40-L in patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: pathogenic and clinical relevance

Infectious Agents and Cancer volume 2, Article number: 5 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Engagement of CD40 promotes survival of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) cells and similar effects are induced by the EBV oncoprotein LMP-1 that is expressed in a fraction of cases. Considering that CD40 may be activated also by the soluble isoform of CD40L (sCD40L), we investigated the serum levels of sCD40L in a series of 61 UNPC patients from Italy, a non-endemic area for this disease.

Results

At diagnosis, serum samples of UNPC patients contained significantly higher levels of sCD40L than age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001). High levels of sCD40L (i.e., >18 ng/ml) were more frequently found in patients <40 years of age (p = 0.03) and with distant metastases at presentation (p = 0.03). Serum levels of sCD40L were inversely associated with the expression of the EBV oncoprotein LMP-1 (p = 0.03), which mimics a constitutively activated CD40. The amount of sCD40L decreased in a fraction of patients treated with local radiotherapy alone. Moreover, CD40L+ lymphoid cells admixed to neoplastic UNPC cells were detected in cases with high serum levels of sCD40L, suggesting that sCD40L is probably produced within the tumor mass.

Conclusion

sCD40L may contribute to CD40 activation in UNPC cells, particularly of LMP-1-negative cases, further supporting the crucial role of CD40 signalling in the pathogenesis of UNPC. sCD40L levels may be useful to identify UNPC patients with occult distant metastases at presentation.

Background

Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) constitutes the most common epithelial malignancy occurring in the nasopharynx, and is characterized by peculiar epidemiologic and clinicopathologic features [1, 2]. UNPC has a high incidence in Southern China and Southeast Asia, whereas it is a rare disease in Europe and North America. Moreover, compared to other head and neck carcinomas, UNPC shows higher invasive and metastatic potential, being frequently diagnosed only after dissemination [3–5]. The presence of a highly cellular lymphoid stroma, admixed with neoplastic cells, represents a peculiar morphologic feature of UNPC. The majority of infiltrating cells is constituted by non-neoplastic T lymphocytes, but other reactive elements such as macrophages, plasma cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils, are also present in varying proportions [6, 7]. Although the role of lymphoid stroma in UNPC is still poorly defined, immunophenotypic analyses have demonstrated that infiltrating T lymphocytes and tumor cells express several immune regulatory receptor/ligand pairs [8, 9], suggesting that biologically relevant interactions between the two cell components probably occur in vivo.

Multiple factors contribute to the pathogenesis of UNPC, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection [1, 2, 10, 11]. In particular, EBV genomes are detected in virtually all UNPC worldwide and are monoclonal, consistent with a causal role for the virus [1, 2, 10]. EBV infection in UNPC cells is characterized by the expression of a limited set of latent proteins, including EBNA-1, LMP-1, and LMP-2 [1, 2, 10]. The LMP-1 protein transforms B both lymphocytes and rodent fibroblasts ad may contribute to the invasive and metastatic potential of carcinoma cells [12, 13]. Recent evidence indicates that LMP-1 functions as a constitutively active tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor being able to recruit cellular signal transducing molecules in the C-terminus of the protein, resulting in the activation of several signaling pathways in a ligand-independent manner [14]. In particular, LMP-1 shares several functional properties with activated CD40, a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, being able, in certain instances, to substitute for CD40 in vivo [15, 16].

CD40 binds to a ligand (CD40L) which is an ~35 kDa transmembrane protein expressed on activated T cells, mast cells, basophilis, eosinophils, and activated platelets [17, 18]. The interaction between CD40 and CD40L is crucial for B-cell activation, antibody production, isotype switching and cell-mediated immune responses [17, 19, 20]. Moreover, the CD40 pathway is also involved in regulating the growth and survival of normal and transformed epithelial cells [21, 22]. In particular, CD40 triggering on UNPC cells may directly convey survival signals, being able to prevent Fas-mediated apoptosis [23]. Like other members of the TNF family, CD40L exists also as a soluble isoform (sCD40L) produced by enzymatic cleavage at a metalloproteinase-sensitive site in the membrane-proximal region of the extracellular domain of the molecule [24, 25]. sCD40L is biologically active and can replace, at least in vitro, the normal T-cell-derived CD40L signal to CD40-bearing cells [24, 25]. sCD40L can be detected in the serum of healthy individuals and elevated levels have been reported in patients with autoimmune diseases [26–28], hepatitis B virus infection [26], lymphoproliferative disorders [29], and lung cancer [30]. Nevertheless, no information is currently available on the presence and amount of sCD40L in the serum of UNPC patients.

We therefore sought to determine the serum levels of sCD40L in a series of UNPC patients from Italy, a non-endemic area for this disease. The study was undertaken with the aim to identify potential associations between circulating levels of sCD40L and the virologic and clinico-pathologic parameters of UNPC at diagnosis, and to define the predictive and prognostic value of serum sCD40L.

Results

UNPC patients have higher serum levels of sCD40L than healthy donors

The individual and tumor-related characteristics of UNPC patients investigated are described in Table 1. Mean serum levels of sCD40L were significantly higher (approximately 3-fold) in UNPC patients than in healthy donors (15.2 ± 6.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.6 ng/ml; p < 0.001) (Figure 1). Table 2 shows the results of the comparison of the sCD40L levels with regard to demographic and presenting clinical features of UNPC patients. Patients with sCD40L levels of in the highest category (>18 ng/ml) were more frequently <40 years old (8/16, 50% vs. 12/45, 26.7%; p = 0.03) (Table 2). No correlation was found between sCD40L levels and T stage or regional lymph node involvement (Table 2), whereas a significantly higher proportion of UNPC patients with distant metastases at presentation carried high amounts (>18 ng/ml) of sCD40L (6/8, 75% vs. 13/51, 25.5%; p = 0.03). Forty-one (69.5%) of the 59 UNPC patients investigated showed detectable amounts of EBV DNA in the serum (median: 16502 copies/ml; range 128–162.756 copies/ml), whereas 18 (30.5%) were negative. No association was found between serum sCD40L levels and EBV DNA load.

Table 1 Distribution of 61 patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) according to selected characteristics. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
Full size table
Table 2 Comparison of patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to sCD40L levels and personal characteristics and presenting clinical features. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

UNPC patients (n = 61) show increased levels of serum sCD40L compared to healthy donors (n = 71) matched for sex and age. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Full size image

Serum levels of sCD40L were inversely associated with LMP-1 expression by tumor cells

Expression of LMP-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry in the large majority of tumor cells of 9 of 51 cases (17.6%) (Figure 2). Serum sCD40L levels were inversely associated with LMP-1 expression, as shown by the more frequent detection of high levels of sCD40L in LMP-1-negative cases (23/42, 54.8%), as compared to LMP-1-positive UNPC patients (1/9, 11.1%; p = 0.03) (Table 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Detection of LMP-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (red) in UNPC tumor cells. Alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase, original magnification ×250.

Full size image

Serum sCD40L was not associated with the generation of active thrombin

sCD40L may be released by platelets activated as a consequence of thrombin generation [18, 31]. Therefore, the pro-thrombin F1+2 fragment was analyzed as a coagulation activation marker because it provides an accurate estimate of the generation of active thrombin. Plasma samples from UNPC patients (n = 32) showed slightly higher levels of F1+2 compared with healthy donors (n = 30), although the mean levels detected in both groups were within the range of normality indicated by the manufacturer (0.91 ± 0.45 vs. 0.62 ± 0.26 nmol/L, not significant). Moreover, no correlation was found between the plasma F1+2 levels and the amount of serum sCD40L in the UNPC patients investigated for both analyses.

Detection of CD40L expression on circulating T lymphocytes from UNPC patients

Membrane CD40L expression was investigated in circulating T cells from 9 UNPC patients and 16 healthy donors. Un-stimulated CD3+ T cells in both groups failed to express CD40L. After in vitro stimulation with PMA and ionomycin for 5 hours, CD3+CD8- cells from both UNPC patients and healthy controls displayed increased CD40L expression, whereas only a negligible number of CD3+CD8+ cells up-regulated CD40L (usually <2%). Notably, a significantly lower percentage of CD3+CD8- T cells from UNPC patients up-regulated CD40L upon stimulation as compared to controls (22.6 ± 9.1 vs. 47.4 ± 7.6; p < 0.001) (Figure 3). The difference remained statistically significant also after correction for the number of CD4+ cells (not shown).

Figure 3
figure3

Membrane CD40L expression by stimulated CD3+CD8- circulating T lymphocytes in UNPC patients and healthy donors. The analysis was carried out using a two-color flow cytometric assay coupled with a previously described gating strategy [42]. The percentage of stimulated CD3+CD8- expressing membrane CD40L is indicated on the y axis. A significantly lower percentage of CD3+CD8- T cells from UNPC patients up-regulated CD40L upon stimulation as compared to controls (p < 0.001). The difference remained statistically significant also after correction for the number of CD4+ cells.

Full size image

Expression of CD40L by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Preliminary experiments carried out in frozen tissue sections from reactive lymph nodes, demonstrated that the expression of CD154/CD40L was restricted to small lymphocytes, confirming previous studies [32, 33]. These cells displayed a prominent dot-like pattern or punctate para-nuclear staining, whereas a small number of positive cells exhibited a membrane staining pattern. The same analysis carried out in UNPC biopsies showed that tumor cells were CD40L-negative in all cases. Conversely, a variable number (1–10%) of non-neoplastic lymphoid cells in areas involved by UNPC were CD40L+. CD40L+ lymphocytes were intermingled with tumor cells and/or located around UNPC tumor nests. In all 5 cases, CD40L expression was correlated with the serum levels of sCD40L. The three cases with more than 5% CD40L+ infiltrating lymphocytes (Figure 4A) had higher levels of sCD40L. Conversely, two cases with a lower content of CD40L+ lymphocytes (<5%) (Figure 4B) were those with lower sCD40L levels.

Figure 4
figure4

Immunohistochemical detection (on frozen tissue sections) of CD40L+ cells within UNPC microenvironment. CD40L positivity is manifested as dot-like staining on isolated small lymphocytes. A. The figure shows a high content of CD40L+ lymphocytes, either intermingled with tumor cells or located around UNPC tumor nests, in a case (female, 37 years old) with high serum levels of sCD40L. B. The figure shows few CD40L+ lymphocytes in a case (male, 34 years old) with a low content of sCD40L. Original magnification ×250.

Full size image

Treatment response and survival

All but seven patients completed the treatment, CR rate occurred in 82% of evaluable patients. After a median follow-up of 37.6 months (range 2.5–154), 16% and 11% of patients developed loco-regional and distant relapse, respectively. Distribution of treatment modalities and CR rate were comparable between patients with high (> 18 ng/ml) and medium-low (≤18 ng/ml) levels of serum sCD40L. Patients with higher sCD40L levels developed more frequently distant failure, whereas patients with medium-low levels developed loco-regional failure, but the difference in the pattern of relapse was of borderline significance (p = 0.07) (Table 2). Patients treated with RT alone had a marked decrease in serum sCD40L levels, but the average difference (3.9 ng/ml) between levels before and after RT was of borderline statistical significance (p = 0.07). The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 81% and 62%, respectively. There was no significant association between the sCD40L levels and outcome (Table 3). Patients with medium-low sCD40L levels had 5-year DFS and OS rates of 83% (95% CI: 68.5%–96.4%) and 62% (95% CI: 46.4%–70.2%), respectively, whereas patients with higher sCD40L levels had a 5-year DFS and OS of 80% (95% CI: 60%–100%) and 59% (95% CI: 35.3%–83.5%).

Table 3 Comparison of patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to sCD40L levels and treatment-related factors. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
Full size table

Discussion

The CD40-CD40L interaction plays a central role in the regulation of immune responses and mediates diverse biological responses that may contribute to the growth and survival of tumor cells. The relevance of CD40-dependent signaling in tumor development is also emphasized by the observation that the oncogenic properties of the EBV protein LMP-1 are due to its ability to hijack part of the CD40 cascade [14–16]. In the present study, we demonstrate that UNPC patients have significantly increased serum levels of sCD40L compared with healthy donors of similar sex and age. Interestingly, UNPC patients 40 years-old or younger carried higher amounts of serum sCD40L, an observation that further supports the hypothesis that UNPC of young people has distinctive epidemiologic and clinico-pathologic features [1, 2]. In fact, while in endemic areas UNPC does not usually occur before 45 years of age [34], in North Africa this tumor also affects young people [1, 2, 7, 35–37], representing 25% of all UNPC-affected patients [38]. Italian UNPC patients have similar epidemiologic features, as shown by a previous retrospective study [39] and by the finding that 28% of patients from the present series were 40 years-old or younger.

Several lines of evidence indicates that tumor cells may shed pro-coagulant factors that can be responsible for the generation of active thrombin [40]. This, in turn, may lead to platelet activation and the consequent release of various factors, including sCD40L [3, 41]. In UNPC patients, however, the mean plasma levels of F1+2 were within the normal range, excluding thus an increased generation of active thrombin. These findings, together with the lack of correlation between the F1+2 levels and the amount of serum sCD40L, rule out that sCD40L is mainly released from platelets in UNPC patients. Moreover, the lack of membrane CD40L in circulating T cells also excludes that a systemic activation of the immune system may be responsible for enhanced release of sCD40L. Interestingly, upon activation, the percentage of CD40L+ T helper cells was significantly reduced in UNPC patients as compared to controls. Similar findings were also observed in HIV-infected children [42]. This effect is probably not due to the loss of distinct subpopulations of T helper lymphocytes, since Italian UNPC patients carry percentages and absolute numbers of CD4+ memory (CD45R0+), CD4+ naive (CD45RA+/CD62L+) and activated (HLA-DR+) CD4+ lymphocytes similar to those of healthy donors [[43], our unpublished results]. Our findings rather support the hypothesis of an underlying functional defect of T cell responses in these patients, as also suggested by previous reports [44, 45]. In particular, some of us have recently demonstrated that circulating CD4+ T lymphocytes from Italian UNPC patients showed impaired IL-2 secretion and increased IL-10 production, consistently with a Th1/Th2 dysregulation [43]. Nevertheless, the nature and the mechanisms responsible for these functional abnormalities are not yet established and warrants further investigation.

Unlike what observed in circulating T cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes expressed membrane CD40L in all cases investigated, consistently with previous findings [8]. Besides strengthening the pathogenic relevance of the interactions occurring between UNPC cells and infiltrating lymphocytes, these results also suggest that sCD40L may be released within tumor microenvironment by activated T cells. This possibility is also supported by the finding that the amount of sCD40L in the serum may decrease in patients treated with local radiotherapy alone. Intriguingly, serum levels of sCD40L were inversely correlated with LMP-1 expression by tumor cells, suggesting that LMP-1-negative UNPC cells may require CD40 activation for growth and/or survival. These findings are in line with the known ability of LMP-1 to usurp part of CD40-dependent signalling and reinforce the notion that CD40 activation is of pathogenic relevance for UNPC [8, 15, 16, 23].

Within tumor tissue, CD40 triggering by both CD40L+ lymphocytes and sCD40L may directly activate signalling pathways contributing to the transformed phenotype of UNPC cells, particularly in the LMP-1-negative cases. It is worth considering that CD40 activation may enhance the invasive potential of a variety of cells through the induction of matrix metalloproteinases [46–49], enzymes that efficiently degrade extracellular matrix proteins [50, 51], favoring thus the metastatic process. Indeed, in our UNPC series, serum sCD40L levels were not correlated with T stage or regional lymph node involvement, ruling out any relationship with loco-regional tumor burden. Conversely, a significantly higher proportion of UNPC patients with distant metastases at presentation carried high levels of sCD40L, suggesting a possible contribution of this factor to an early hematogenous spreading of UNPC cells. The high levels of sCD40L detected in the serum of UNPC patients may also prevent apoptosis of UNPC cells circulating in the blood and favour their survival and/or growth after localization at distant sites. Moreover, considering that matrix metalloproteinases are involved in the generation of sCD40L [24, 24], local production of these enzymes induced by CD40 triggering may in turn enhance the release of sCD40L.

While sCD40L levels may be useful to identify UNPC patients with occult distant metastasis at presentation, our study indicate that the amount of serum sCD40L does not provide a reliable estimate of tumor burden. This is in keeping with the hypothesis that sCD40L is not a product of tumor cells, being rather part of a still poorly defined anti-tumor immune response. On these grounds, additional studies are required to better understand the role played by sCD40L within the frames of the complex immune response mounted by UNPC patients against tumour cells. Moreover, no significant prognostic role on clinical outcome was found for serum sCD40L in our series. It should be considered, however, that 5-year DFS (81%) and OS rates (62%) of our patients compare favorably with the results of other UNPC series [52–54]. These data suggest that, if active treatment strategies are used, the prognostic impact of variables such as sCD40L may be measurable only in larger series. On these grounds, it would be relevant to include the evaluation of serum sCD40L among the parameters of possible prognostic value in studies enrolling high number of UNPC patients from both endemic and non-endemic areas.

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that sCD40L may contribute to CD40 activation in UNPC cells, particularly among LMP-1-negative cases, further supporting the crucial role of CD40 signalling in the pathogenesis of UNPC. sCD40L levels may be useful to identify UNPC patients with occult metastases at presentation.

Methods

Patients characteristics

Sixty-one patients with histologically confirmed UNPC were enrolled between 1994–2003 (Table 1). The medical records were reviewed and all patients were restaged according to the 2002 edition of the UICC/TNM classification system. All patients received various treatment modalities, such as cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (CDDP-CT) alone (10 cases), accelerated radiotherapy (RT) alone (16 cases) or combined treatment including neo-adjuvant CDDP-CT plus accelerated RT (25 cases) or CDDP-CT plus standard RT (10 cases). Complete response (CR) was defined as the complete disappearance of all cancer lesions for at least 4 weeks. Partial response (PR) was defined as 50% reduction of the sum of the products of the cross-sectional diameters of all known lesions for at least 4 weeks. No response (NR) was defined as <50% PR or progressive disease. Fifty-four (89%) patients were assessable for treatment response. Seven (11%) patients were not assessable because of early deaths due to co-morbidity (4 cases) or toxicity (3 cases). As control group, 71 healthy donors matched for sex and age (51 males, 20 females; mean age of 47.3 ± 11.3 ranging from 20 to 68 years) were also evaluated. Informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Histopathological diagnosis and immunohistochemistry

Primary and metastatic UNPC were diagnosed according to histologic criteria provided by W.H.O. classification for nasopharyngeal carcinomas [7]. Cases with morphological characteristics of non-keratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma [7] were selected for the study. EBV infection was detected in all cases by EBER in situ hybridization performed as previously reported [55]. Immunohistochemistry for LMP-1 expression was carried out on paraffin-embedded tissue sections using the CS1-4 antibody (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) and the APAAP method [56]. Immunohistochemical detection of CD40L was carried out on frozen sections obtained from 4 nasopharyngeal samples and 1 lymph node involved by UNPC by the APAAP technique [56] and the anti-CD154/CD40L 24–31 antibody (IgG1; Ancell Corporation, Bayport, MN). In each case, the percentage of CD40L+ lymphocytes was derived from the number of CD40L+ lymphocytes counted on a total of 100 lymphocytes evaluated. Negative control experiments were performed by incubating sections with irrelevant isotype-matched mouse Ig and by omitting the primary antibody.

Sample collection and immunoassays

Serum samples were collected from 61 UNPC patients and 71 matched healthy donors. Plasma was also obtained from 32 UNPC patients and 30 donors using Na citrate 3.8% (1:9 v:v) as anticoagulant, immediately centrifuged at 1,500 × g at 4°C for 20 min, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C until analysis. Measurement of serum sCD40L levels was carried out using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the sandwich principle, according to manufacturer's instructions (Immunokontact; sensitivity: 0.0095 ng/ml). Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels were measured in plasma samples by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (Enzygnost F1+2; Dade-Behring; reference range: 0.4–1.1 nmol/L). Measurements were done blinded. All samples were assayed in duplicate, and those showing values above the standard curve were re-tested with appropriate dilutions.

EBV DNA load quantitation

Serum EBV DNA levels were measured by amplifying a 65-bp DNA fragment of the LMP-1 gene using a previously described real-time PCR assay [57]. The reaction was performed in a 25 μl volume containing 2× TaqMan Universal Master Mixture, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 99 pmol of each primer (forward: 5'-AAGGTCAAAGAACAAGGCCAAG-3', nucleotides 168,231–168,252; reverse: 5'-GCATCGGAGTCGGTGGG-3', nucleotides 168,188–168,204), 175 pmol of the fluorogenic probe (5'-6-FAM-AGGAGCGTGTCCCCGTGGAGG-TAMRA-3') and 5 μl of sample. Standard curves were generated using the diploid Namalwa cells, which stably harbours two integrated copies of the EBV genome. The method was linear over four orders of magnitude and sensitive to as few as 5 copies of template EBV DNA. To check for PCR inhibition, each sample was also co-amplified with a positive control (500 EBV DNA copies/reaction from Namalwa cells). Results were expressed as copies of EBV genomes/ml of serum.

Immunophenotypic analyses

A two-color flow cytometric assay was used to study CD40L expression on resting and activated circulating T cells. Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from citrated venous blood by centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque (1500 rpm, 30 min). Isolated PBMCs were washed three times with PBS and incubated at room temperature for 20 min with appropriate antibody combinations. Activation of T cells was carried out by incubating purified PBMCs (0.4 × 106 cells/ml) in RPMI 1640, 10% FCS in the presence of 20 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate (PMA, Sigma, Milan), and 0.75 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma) for 5 hr in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cell were harvested, washed and labeled with CD40L-PE/CD3-FITC or CD40L-PE/CD8-FITC antibody combinations. CD40L expression on T helper lymphocytes was evaluated using a previously described gating algorithm [42] which included both lymphocytes (using forward scatter parameters) and CD3+CD8- T lymphocytes (using fluorescence parameters). This gating strategy allowed the evaluation of CD4+ lymphocytes (contained in the population of CD3+ CD8- T cells) and was necessary because the CD4 molecule itself is down-modulated after stimulation. Results are expressed as either the percentage of CD3+CD8- T lymphocytes expressing CD40L or the level of CD40L expressed per T helper cell (mean fluorescence intensity). Isotype-matched FITC- and PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 (Beckman-Coulter, Milan) were used as negative controls. After incubation, each sample was washed twice with PBS, re-suspended in PBS and immediately analyzed in an Epics Altra flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter). A total of 10.000 cells were acquired and analyzed by Expo 32 software (Beckman-Coulter).

Statistical analysis

sCD40L levels were categorized in two groups based on frequency distribution: medium-low, (≤18 ng/ml), or high (>18 ng/ml). The association between sCD40L levels and personal characteristics, clinical and biological parameters was tested by means of the chi-square test (chi-square test for trend, when appropriate) or the Student's T-test. The overall survival (OS) was computed from the date of UNPC diagnosis to death or to the last known date of examination, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated (for CR patients only) from the date at starting therapy to date of relapse, death or the last known date of examination. Both the OS and the DFS were statistically assessed by means of the Kaplan-Meyer method.

References

  1. 1.

    International Agency for Research on Cancer: Epstein-Barr Virus and Kaposi's Sarcoma Herpesvirus/Human Herpesvirus 8. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 1997, Lyon, France: WHO, 70:

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dolcetti R, Menezes J: Epstein-Barr virus and undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: new immunobiological and molecular insights on a long-standing etiopathogenic association. Adv Cancer Res. 2003, 87: 127-157. 10.1016/S0065-230X(03)87296-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hsu MM, Tu SM: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. Clinical manifestations and results of therapy. Cancer. 1983, 52: 362-368. 10.1002/1097-0142(19830715)52:2<362::AID-CNCR2820520230>3.0.CO;2-V.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cvitkovic E, Boussen H, Armand JP: Nasopharyngeal cancer, undifferentiated type: The medical oncologist's view point. Cancer Chemotherapy: Concepts, Clinical Investigations, and Therapeutic advances. Edited by: Muggia FM. 1989, Kluwer, Norwell (MA), 175-

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chew CT: Early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Acad Med (Singapore). 1990, 19: 270-274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hsu HC, Chen CL, Hsu MM, Lynn TC, Tu SM, Huang SC: Pathology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Proposal of a new histologic classification correlated with prognosis. Cancer. 1987, 59: 945-951. 10.1002/1097-0142(19870301)59:5<945::AID-CNCR2820590516>3.0.CO;2-B.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, Eds: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. 2005, IARC Press: Lyon, 85-97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Agathanggelou A, Niedobitek G, Chen R, Nicholls J, Yin W, Young LS: Expression of immune regulatory molecules in Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas with prominent lymphoid stroma. Evidence for a functional interaction between epithelial tumor cells and infiltrating lymphoid cells. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147: 1152-1160.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Niedobitek G, Young LS, Sam CK, Brooks L, Prasad U, Rickinson AB: Expression of Epstein-Barr virus genes and of lymphocyte activation molecules in undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 1992, 140: 879-887.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lo KW, Huang DP: Genetic and epigenetic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002, 12: 451-462. 10.1016/S1044579X02000883.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Raab-Traub N: Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002, 12: 431-441. 10.1016/S1044579X0200086X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dawson CW, Rickinson AB, Young LS: Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein inhibits human epithelial cell differentiation. Nature. 1990, 344: 777-780. 10.1038/344777a0.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li X, Liu X, Li CY, Ding Y, Chau D, Li G, Kung HF, Lin MC, Peng Y: Recombinant adeno-associated virus mediated RNA interference inhibits metastasis of nasopharyngeal cancer cells in vivo and in vitro by suppression of Epstein-Barr virus encoded LMP-1. Int J Oncol. 2006, 29: 595-603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eliopoulos AG, Young LS: LMP1 structure and signal transduction. Semin Cancer Biol. 2001, 11: 435-444. 10.1006/scbi.2001.0410.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Uchida J, Yasui T, Takaoka-Shichijo Y, Muraoka M, Kulwichit W, Raab-Traub N, Kikutani H: Mimicry of CD40 signals by Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 in B lymphocyte responses. Science. 1999, 286: 300-303. 10.1126/science.286.5438.300.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lam N, Sugden B: CD40 and its viral mimic, LMP1: similar means to different ends. Cell Signal. 2003, 15: 9-16. 10.1016/S0898-6568(02)00083-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    van Kooten C, Banchereau J: CD40-CD40 ligand. J Leukoc Biol. 2000, 67: 2-17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Henn V, Slupsky JR, Grafe M, Anagnostopoulos I, Forster R, Muller-Berghaus G, Kroczek RA: CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells. Nature. 1998, 391: 591-594. 10.1038/35393.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Noelle RJ: CD40 and its ligand in host defense. Immunity. 1996, 4: 415-419. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80408-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Grewal IS, Flavell RA: CD40 and CD154 in cell-mediated immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998, 16: 111-135. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.111.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Young LS, Eliopoulos AG, Gallagher NJ, Dawson CW: CD40 and epithelial cells: across the great divide. Immunol Today. 1998, 19: 502-506. 10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01340-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yamaguchi H, Tanaka F, Sadanaga N, Ohta M, Inoue H, Mori M: Stimulation of CD40 inhibits Fas- or chemotherapy-mediated apoptosis and increases cell motility in human gastric carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2003, 23: 1697-1702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sbih-Lammali F, Clausse B, Ardila-Osorio H, Guerry R, Talbot M, Havouis S, Ferradini L, Bosq J, Tursz T, Busson P: Control of apoptosis in Epstein Barr virus-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells: opposite effects of CD95 and CD40 stimulation. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 924-930.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Graf D, Muller S, Korthauer U, van Kooten C, Weise C, Kroczek RA: A soluble form of TRAP (CD40 ligand) is rapidly released after T cell activation. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 1749-1754. 10.1002/eji.1830250639.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pietravalle F, Lecoanet-Henchoz S, Blasey H, Aubry JP, Elson G, Edgerton MD, Bonnefoy JY, Gauchat JF: Human native soluble CD40L is a biologically active trimer, processed inside microsomes. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 5965-5967. 10.1074/jbc.271.11.5965.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vakkalanka RK, Woo C, Kirou KA, Koshy M, Berger D, Crow MK: Elevated levels and functional capacity of soluble CD40 ligand in systemic lupus erythematosus sera. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42: 871-881. 10.1002/1529-0131(199905)42:5<871::AID-ANR5>3.0.CO;2-J.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tamura N, Kobayashi S, Kato K, Bando H, Haruta K, Oyanagi M, Kuriyama M, Kipps TJ, Hashimoto H: Soluble CD154 in rheumatoid arthritis: elevated plasma levels in cases with vasculitis. J Rheumatol. 2001, 28: 2583-2590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Komura K, Sato S, Hasegawa M, Fujimoto M, Takehara K: Elevated circulating CD40L concentrations in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2004, 31: 514-519.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Younes A, Snell V, Consoli U, Clodi K, Zhao S, Palmer JL, Thomas EK, Armitage RJ, Andreeff M: Elevated levels of biologically active soluble CD40 ligand in the serum of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1998, 100: 135-141. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00522.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Roselli M, Mineo TC, Basili S, Martini F, Mariotti S, Aloe S, Del Monte G, Ambrogi V, Spila A, Palmirotta R, D'Alessandro R, Davi G, Guadagni F, Ferroni P: Soluble CD40 Ligand Plasma Levels in Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 610-614. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0348-03.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jin Y, Nonoyama S, Morio T, Imai K, Ochs HD, Mizutani S: Characterization of soluble CD40 ligand released from human activated platelets. J Med Dent Sci. 2001, 48: 23-27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carbone A, Gloghini A, Gruss H-J, Pinto A: CD40 ligand is constitutively expressed in a subset of T-cell lymphomas and on the microenvironmental reactive T-cells of follicular lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147: 912-922.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guidoboni M, Zancai P, Cariati R, Rizzo S, Dal Col J, Pavan A, Gloghini A, Spina M, Cuneo A, Pomponi F, Bononi A, Doglioni C, Maestro R, Carbone A, Boiocchi M, Dolcetti R: Retinoic acid inhibits the proliferative response induced by CD40 activation and interleukin-4 in mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 587-595.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ho JHC: Stage classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: etiology and control. Edited by: de Thé G, Ito Y. 1978, No 20, Lyon. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, 22-

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cammoun M, Vogt-Hoerner G, Mourali N: Tumors of the nasopharynx in Tunisia. Clinico-pathologic study of 143 cases. Tunis Med. 1971, 3: 131-141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Benider A, Sahraoui S, Acharki A, Samlali R, Kahlain A: Carcinomas of the nasopharynx in children. Analysis of 50 cases. Bull Cancer. 1995, 82: 155-161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Khabir A, Sellami A, Sakka M, Ghorbel AM, Daoud J, Frikha M, Drira MM, Busson P, Jlidi R: Contrasted frequencies of p53 accumulation in the two age groups of North African nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 3932-3936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    El Gueddari B, El Hafed A, Bouih A, El Morchid M, Kahlain A: Cancer of the nasopharynx in Morocco: epidemiological approach. 1984, IARC Scientific Publication No 63, International Agency for Research on Cancer (Lyon), 513-

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Franchin G, Vaccher E, Talamini R, Gobitti C, Minatel E, Politi D, Sartor G, Trovò MG, Barzan L: Nasopharyngeal cancer WHO type II-III: monoistitutional retrospective analysis with standard and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy. Oral Oncol. 2002, 38: 137-144. 10.1016/S1368-8375(01)00034-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Honn KV, Tang DG, Chen YQ: Platelets and cancer metastasis: more than an epiphenomenon. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1992, 18: 392-415.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cavanaugh PG, Sloane BF, Honn KV: Role of the coagulation system in tumor-cell-induced platelet aggregation and metastasis. Haemostasis. 1988, 18: 37-46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    O'Gorman MR, DuChateau B, Paniagua M, Hunt J, Bensen N, Yogev R: Abnormal CD40 ligand (CD154) expression in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001, 8: 1104-1109. 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1104-1109.2001.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zanussi S, Vaccher E, Caffau C, Pratesi C, Crepaldi C, Bortolin MT, Tedeschi R, Politi D, Barzan L, Tirelli U, De Paoli P: Interferon-gamma secretion and perforin expression are impaired in CD8+ T lymphocytes from patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003, 52: 28-32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tsukuda M, Sawaki S, Yanoma S: Suppressed cellular immunity in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1993, 120: 115-118. 10.1007/BF01200735.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cheng PN, Shiu WC, Tsao SY, O SK: Lymphopenia and deranged lymphocyte subsets in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol. 1989, 14: 53-59.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Malik N, Greenfield BW, Wahl AF, Kiener PA: Activation of human monocytes through CD40 induces matrix metalloproteinases. J Immunol. 1996, 156: 3952-3960.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mach F, Schonbeck U, Fabunmi RP, Murphy C, Atkinson E, Bonnefoy JY, Graber P, Libby P: T lymphocytes induce endothelial cell matrix metalloproteinase expression by a CD40L-dependent mechanism: implications for tubule formation. Am J Pathol. 1999, 154: 229-238.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lollini PL, Landuzzi L, Frabetti F, Rossi I, Nicoletti G, Scotlandi K, Serra M, Baldini N, De Giovanni C, Nanni P: Expression of functional CD40 on human osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1998, 4: 1843-1849.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Smola-Hess S, Schnitzler R, Hadaschik D, Smola H, Mauch C, Krieg T, Pfister H: CD40L induces matrix-metalloproteinase-9 but not tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in cervical carcinoma cells: imbalance between NF-kappaB and STAT3 activation. Exp Cell Res. 2001, 267: 205-215. 10.1006/excr.2001.5256.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Polette M, Nawrocki-Raby B, Gilles C, Clavel C, Birembaut P: Tumour invasion and matrix metalloproteinases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004, 49: 179-186.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hagedorn HG, Bachmeier BE, Nerlich AG: Synthesis and degradation of basement membranes and extracellular matrix and their regulation by TGF-beta in invasive carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2001, 18: 669-681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sanguineti G, Geara FB, Garden AS, Tucker SL, Ang KK, Morrison WH, Peters LJ: Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated with radiotheraphy alone: determinants of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys. 1997, 37: 985-996. 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00104-1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, Fu KK, Cooper J, Vuong T, Forastiere AA, Adams G, Sakr WA, Schuller DE, Ensley JF: Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotheraphy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 1310-137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Heng DM, Wee J, Fong KW, Lian LG, Sethi VK, Chua ET, Yang TL, Khoo Tan HS, Lee KS, Lee KM, Tan T, Chua EJ: Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999, 86: 1912-1920. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991115)86:10<1912::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-S.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Carbone A, Cilia AM, Gloghini A, Canzonieri V, Pastore C, Todesco M, Cozzi M, Perin T, Volpe R, Pinto A, Gaidano G: Establishment of HHV-8 positive and HHV-8 negative lymphoma cell lines from primary lymphomatous effusions. Int J Cancer. 1997, 73: 562-569. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971114)73:4<562::AID-IJC18>3.0.CO;2-B.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cordell JL, Falini B, Erber WN, Ghosh AK, Abdulaziz Z, MacDonald S, Pulford KA, Stein H, Mason DY: Immunoenzymatic labelling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). J Histochem Cytochem. 1984, 32: 219-229.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bortolin MT, Pratesi C, Dolcetti R, Bidoli E, Vaccher E, Zanussi S, Tedeschi R, De Paoli P: Clinical value of Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels in peripheral blood samples of Italian patients with Undifferentiated Carcinoma of Nasopharyngeal Type. Cancer Lett. 2006, 233: 247-254. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.03.015.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Pre-Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Laura Caggiari, Massimo Guidoboni, Debora Martorelli, Paola Zancai, Diego Serraino & Riccardo Dolcetti

  2. Dept. of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Emanuela Vaccher

  3. Head and Neck Department, Azienda Ospedaliera, Pordenone, Italy

    Luigi Barzan

  4. Dept. of Radiotherapy, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Giovanni Franchin

  5. Dept. of Pathology, Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Pathology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Annunziata Gloghini

  6. Blood Bank, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Mario Mazzucato

  7. Dept. of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy

    Antonino Carbone

  8. Microbiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS - National Cancer Institute, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Maria Teresa Bortolin & Paolo De Paoli

  9. Immunovirology and Biotherapy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, National Cancer Institute, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081, Aviano (PN), Italy

    Riccardo Dolcetti

Authors
  1. Laura Caggiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Guidoboni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emanuela Vaccher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luigi Barzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giovanni Franchin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Annunziata Gloghini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Debora Martorelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paola Zancai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Maria Teresa Bortolin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mario Mazzucato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Diego Serraino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Antonino Carbone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Paolo De Paoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Riccardo Dolcetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Dolcetti.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LC carried out the immunoassays, participated in the immunophenotypic analyses and drafted the manuscript. MG carried out the immunophenotypic assays and contributed to draft the manuscript. AG and AC were responsible for the histopathologic characterization and immunohistochemical findings and participated in drafting the manuscript. MM and DM carried out Prothrombin fragment 1+2 assays. PDP and MTB carried out the EBV DNA load quantitation. DS carried out the statistical analyses. EV, LB, and GF contributed to patient selection, collection and analysis of clinical data. DS participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. RD conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caggiari, L., Guidoboni, M., Vaccher, E. et al. High serum levels of soluble CD40-L in patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: pathogenic and clinical relevance. Infect Agents Cancer 2, 5 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-2-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Active Thrombin
  • CD40 Activation
  • Regional Lymph Node Involvement
  • CD40L Expression
  • sCD40L Level

Infectious Agents and Cancer

ISSN: 1750-9378

Contact us