Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of critical appraisal of included observational studies using Newcastle‒Ottawa scores

From: A systematic review of endometrial cancer clinical research in Africa

Study

Study design

Total score

Ray, 2019

Case control

7, Good

Ghazala, 2021

Cohort

7, Fair

Abouhashem, 2016

Cohort

8, Good

Aly, 2013

Cohort

9, Good

El Sokkary, 2014

Cohort

8, Good

Gharib, 2020

Cohort

7, Good

Hamed, 2012

Cohort

8, Good

Mourad, 2017

Cohort

9, Good

Sanad, 2019

Cohorta

7, Faira

Shady, 2016

Cohort

9, Good

Shatat, 2019

Cohorta

7, Faira

Soliman, 2011

Cohorta

7, Faira

Rady, 2019b

Nonrandomized experimental study

8, Good

Wadee, 2021c

Cross- sectional

8, Good

Elmahdy, 2019

Cross- sectional

7, Good

Ghorbel, 2020

Cross- sectional

7, Good

  1. aThese studies had an inadequate degree of control; thus, the total score was based on this
  2. bThis nonrandomized experimental study was evaluated as a cohort study
  3. cThis author utilized the same patient population for 2 studies, alternately describing the design as a cohort vs a cross-sectional/diagnostic accuracy study. The cohort study was excluded