Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics of studies investigating the prognostic relevance of HPV-18

From: Prognostic implication of human papillomavirus types in cervical cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Total number of patients

Mean age

Clinical stage

Treatment

Number of patients with HPV-18 positive

Number of patients with HPV-18 negative

Median DFS

Median PFS

Median OS

Yat Ming Lau

2015

Hong Kong, China

236

54.4

I-III

radiotherapy+/−chemotherapy.

30

185

73.2% vs. 78.2%, HR: 1.49, 95% CI = 0.78–2.86

NA

80% vs. 75.7%, HR: 1.23, 95% CI = 0.66–2.27

Sun-Hye Yang

2014

Korea

116

NA

I-IIA

surgery

15

101

NA

HR: 5.2, 95% CI = 1.29–20.9, P = 0.02

Not significant

Rossana de Arau ́jo Cata ̃o Zampronha

2013

Brazil

86

40

I

Surgery+radiotherapy

25

51

HR: 0.797, 95% CI = 0.175–3.640

NA

NA

Robert A. Burger

1996

USA

291

NA

I-IV

radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy

58

233

NA

NA

HR: 2.59, 95% CI = 1.08–6.22

Chyong-Huey Lai

2007

Taiwan, China

1067

50

IA-IIA

surgery

176

891

HR: 1.8, 95% CI = 1.8–2.7

 

HR: 1.7, 95% CI = 1.1–2.6

Woo Dae Kang

2011

Korea

204

49

IB-IIA

radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or primary radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-containing chemotherapy

28

176

NA

HR: 2.664, 95% CI = 1.437–4.938

NA

Shizhuo Wang

2012

China

24,041

NA

I-IV

NA

2082

21,959

NA

NA

HR: 1.704, 95% CI = 1.095–2.654

  1. HPV Human papillomavirus, DFS Disease free survival, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval, NA Not available, DFS Disease free survival, PFS Progression free survival, OS Overall survival