Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of studies investigating the prognostic relevance of HPV-16

From: Prognostic implication of human papillomavirus types in cervical cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Total number of patients

Mean age

Clinical stage

Treatment

Number of patients with HPV-16 positive

Number of patients with HPV-18 negative

Median DFS

Median PFS

Median OS

Yat Ming Lau

2015

Hong Kong, China

236

54.4

I-III

radiotherapy+/−chemotherapy

142

94

73.2% vs. 81.2%, HR: 1.54, 95% CI = 0.93–2.56

NA

71.6% vs. 81.7%, HR: 0.99, 95% CI = 0.64–1.55

Dong Hang

2017

China

306

48

I-IV

surgery alone, surgery plus adjunctive chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy only.

186

120

NA

NA

HR: 0.36, 95% CI = 0.18–0.74, P = 0.005

Mamiko Onuki

2018

Japan

137

49.2

I-IV

Surgery+radiotherapy

59

78

NA

NA

HR: 0.42, 95% CI = 0.15–1.04, P = 0.06

Byoung Hyuck Kim

2019

Korea

298

48

I-IV

radiotherapy

164

127

NA

77.6 vs. 57.7%, P = 0.022

HR: 0.558, 95% CI = 0.326–0.955, P = 0.033

Sun-Hye Yang

2014

Korea

116

NA

I-IIA

surgery

49

67

NA

HR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.31–5.67, P = 0.70

Not significant

Rossana de Arau ́jo Cata ̃o Zampronha

2013

Brazil

86

40

I

Surgery+radiotherapy

30

56

HR: 1.104, 95% CI = 0.243–5.007

NA

NA

  1. HPV Human papillomavirus, DFS Disease free survival, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval, NA Not available, DFS Disease free survival, PFS Progression free survival, OS Overall survival