Open Access

The co-evolved Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: trinity of bacterial virulence, host susceptibility and lifestyle

  • Yusuf Akhter1,
  • Irshad Ahmed2,
  • S Manjulata Devi1 and
  • Niyaz Ahmed1Email author
Infectious Agents and Cancer20072:2

DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-2-2

Received: 29 November 2006

Accepted: 04 January 2007

Published: 04 January 2007

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is an important yet unproven etiological agent of gastric cancer. H. pylori infection is more prevalent in developing Asian countries like India and it is usually acquired at an early age. It has been two decades since Marshall and Warren (1984) first described curved bacilli in the stomach of ulcer and gastritis patients. This discovery has won them the Nobel Prize recently, but the debate whether H. pylori is a pathogen or a commensal organism is still hot. Associations with disease-specific factors remain illusive years after the genome sequences were made available. Cytotoxin-associated antigen A (CagA) and the so-called plasticity region cluster genes are implicated in pathogenesis of the carcinoma of stomach. Another virulence factor VacA whose role is still debatable, has recently been projected in pathology of gastric cancer. Studies of the evolution through genetic variation in H. pylori populations have provided a window into the history of human population migrations and a possible co-evolution of this pathogen with its human host. Possible symbiotic relationships were seriously debated since the discovery of this pathogen. The debate has been further intensified as some studies proposed H. pylori infection to be beneficial in some humans. In this commentary, we attempt to briefly discuss about H. pylori as a human pathogen, and some of the important issues linked to its pathophysiology in different hosts.

'We dance around in a ring and suppose, the secret sits in the middle and knows' – Robert Frost

Background

Barry J. Marshall and Robin Warren, two Australian researchers who discovered the bacterium Helicobacter pylori in 1982 have been awarded Nobel Prize of 2005 in Physiology or Medicine. This 'old fashioned medical detective work' impressed the Nobel Assembly of the Karolinska Institute, to move away from basic research [1, 2] and to reward the research that proposes a much controversial bacterial organism as a dangerous pathogen. It was a long-standing dogma in the medical science that stress and lifestyle factors lead to gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Warren and Marshal rebutted that dogma and made it clear that curved bacilli called Campylobacter pyloridis (later named as Helicobacter pylori) were the main cause of peptic ulceration, distal gastric adenocarcinoma, and gastric lymphoma [3]. Soon after this, H. pylori colonization model became one of the best-studied examples of pathogen evolution and its role in infection biology. This marked also the beginning of a contest on how long H. pylori had been colonizing human stomach, promoting the analogy of a symbiotic organism coevolved with its human host.

H. pylori as a marker of human peopling and migration: example of co-evolution

H. pylori is presumably co-evolved with its host and therefore, origins and expansion of multiple populations and sub populations of H. pylori mirror ancient human migrations. Ancient origins of H. pylori in the world and in India are not clear and debatable. It is not clear how different waves of human migrations in different continents contributed to the evolution of strain diversity of H. pylori. Our group has recently attempted to address these issues through mapping genetic origins of H. pylori of native Peruvians (of Amerindian ancestry) [4] and Indians (Devi et al., unpublished data) and their genomic comparison with hundreds of isolates from different geographic regions. For this purpose, genetic identity of strains was dissected by fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (FAFLP) analysis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of the housekeeping genes and the sequence analyses of the bab B adhesin and oip A genes. The whole cag pathogenicity-island (cag PAI) from these strains was also analyzed using PCR and gene sequencing. In case of South American H. pylori populations, it was observed that while European genotype (hp-Europe) predominated in native Peruvian strains, approximately 20% of these strains represented a sub-population with an Amerindian ancestry (hsp-Amerind). However, all of these strains were shown to harbor a complete, 'western' type cag PAI, irrespective of their ancestral affiliation and the motifs surrounding it. This indicated a possible acquisition of cag PAI by the hsp-Amerind strains from the European strains, during decades of co-colonization. These observations, therefore, suggested presence of ancestral H. pylori (hsp-Amerind) in Peruvian Amerindians, which possibly managed to survive and compete against the Spanish strains that arrived to the New World about 500 years ago. It was suggested that this might have happened after native Peruvian H. pylori strains acquired cag PAI sequences, either by new acquisition in cag-negative strains or by recombination in cag positive Amerindian strains. In case of Indian strains, almost all the isolates analyzed revealed a European ancestry and belonged to MLST genogroup hp-Europe. The cag PAI harbored by Indian strains also revealed European features upon PCR based analysis and whole PAI sequencing. These observations suggest that H. pylori in India have ancient origins in Europe (Devi et al, unpublished data). These results are expected to strengthen speculations related to large-scale replacement of the ancient indigenous people of India by Indo-Aryan nomads, bringing first Neolithic practices and languages from the Fertile Crescent.

H. pylori in gastric diseases

H. pylori causes peptic ulceration, gastric adenocarcinoma, and gastric lymphoma. Gastric adenocarcinoma is the second highest cause of cancer deaths worldwide mainly due to high incidence, aggressive disease course, and lack of effective treatment options leading to a death toll of one million per annum worldwide [3]. H. pylori is implicated in distal gastric adenocarcinoma, which is more common than the proximal one. H. pylori also causes B cell mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stomach [3] but at the same time negatively associated with more severe forms of reflux esophagitis and its sequelae – Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma [5, 6]. This negative correlation is the main reason that makes H. pylori a lesser evil. There has been a recent interest to look if H. pylori causes or facilitates human diseases of the gut other than the upper gastrointestinal tract or syndromes like idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [5, 6], skin diseases, liver diseases, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. But many of these have been associated more commonly with Helicobacters other than H. pylori [7, 8].

Bacterial encoded proinflammatory and carcinogenic factors

Studies reveal that the risk for developing gastric carcinoma was much greater with the H. pylori infection [9]. The cag A gene of H. pylori is the main virulence factor that leads to the development of gastric adenocarcinoma through derangement of cellular architecture and signaling. Presence of a functional cag A gene determines the H. pylori strain type to be aggressive or mild. The cag A-positive strains cause much intense ulceration of stomach or duodenum and are more damaging than the cag A-negative ones [10] leading to atrophic gastritis and gastric carcinoma [11, 12]. CagA, the effector protein product of cag A, is tyrosine phosphorylated by SRC kinases after its secretion on the intestinal mucosal surface [13]. EPIYA motifs in the CagA protein sequence play a critical role in tyrosine phosphorylation, which in turn activates a SHP2 phosphatase to act as a oncoprotein. As SHP2 helps in cell growth and motility, its deregulation by CagA is an important oncogenic mechanism encoded by H. pylori. CagA based on sequence variation at the SHP2 binding site, is sub-classified into two main epidemiological types – East-Asian CagA (with stronger SHP2 binding and greater biological activity) and Western CagA (diminished SHP2 binding and milder ulcerative potentials). Strains with multiple CagA tyrosine phosphorylation motifs are more commonly associated with gastric cancer than those with fewer C type motifs [1416].

Incidence of infection with H. pylori carrying biologically more active CagA might explain the high occurrence of gastric carcinoma in some countries such as Japan and Korea. However, other populations with extremely high infection rates, such as Indians have almost negligible incidence of gastric carcinoma [17]. Possible reasons for such strange differences of disease outcome might be explained in the light of differences in genetic susceptibility among host populations, environmental factors such as dietary habits, and strain differences of H. pylori.

H. pylori has a single copy of the vac A gene encoding VacA protein, a secreted 95 kDa peptide. The vac A gene varies in the signal sequence (alleles s1a, s1b, s1c, s2) and/or its middle region (alleles m1, m2) among different H. pylori populations. The different allotypes of s and m regions determine the extent of cytotoxicity of VacA. Strains with vac A genotype s1/m1 are more commonly associated with gastric cancer than the other types [18]. Among other functions, VacA has been shown to induce apoptosis in epithelial cells. Recently, VacA has been proposed to be a potent immunomodulatory toxin, targeting the adapted immune system to suppress local immune responses to prolong the outcome of infection and thus prevent clearance by the host immune system [19]. The VacA has been the subject of intense biochemistry but lacked solid evidences that it is indeed involved in pathogenesis. A recent study argues that VacA has a miniscule role as a virulence factor during cell evasion by H. pylori. They showed that the vac A null mutant of H. pylori was able to evade specific cell lines, as did its wild type [20]. Therefore, the VacA involvement is still part of a debate on its being a true virulence factor and awaits further investigation.

Apart from the cardinal virulence factors CagA and VacA, several other proteins of the cag PAI, outer membrane envelope proteins, flagellins, adhesins, neutrophil activating protein (NAP), porins, LPS, urease and some members of the so called plasticity region cluster possibly playing an important role in inflammatory processes.

Microevolution during colonization: can it be linked to virulence optimization?

It has long been assumed that i) the H. pylori virulence factors are stable characteristic amid an otherwise fast evolving and recombining genome and ii) that these factors can be linked to disease progression or outcome, at any time. However, several reports present data against these assumptions. Two subclones of a H. pylori strain co-colonized a single patient with variations in vac A mid region, rendering one of the two sub-clones non-toxic [21]. The reason for this was clearly the microevolution via recombination within the stomach. Our group has previously shown a large deletion in vac A gene occurring in one of the two isolates of a common progenitor strain in a French patient, obtained 9 years apart [22]. This was most probably a case of adaptation or evolution in vivo. Duplication or deletion of the cag A gene has been shown by Aras et al., [23] in two isolates existing in one individual and recovered 7 years apart. Kersulyte et al, have shown complete deletion of cag PAI through recombination [24]. In addition, various genotyping methods applied to two or more H. pylori isolates obtained from the same patient revealed similar fingerprints, with minor differences [25, 26]. This may be possible due to the fact that two or more isolates recovered from a patient may share an ancestral relationship with a founder strain but have undergone independent genomic alterations. This phenomenon has been termed as 'microevolution' [25, 27]. However, sequence evidence is necessary to confirm the location and extent of microevolution and phenotypic confirmation [16] is required to ascertain if such microevolution leads to alteration or optimization of virulence in response to change in the gastric environment.

Host genetic factors in H. pylori induced carcinoma

Host factors also play an important role in predisposition to H. pylori induced diseases and susceptibilities towards severe pathological outcomes. The host factors relevant in H. pylori induced diseases mainly include components of gastric secretion system and the immune apparatus. Interestingly, the gastritis and ulcer disease that result from bacterial infection, have distinct clinical profiles and are inversely associated with a high degree of acid secretion, whereas, gastric cancers are associated with low acid secretion due to loss of parietal cell mass [28, 29]. In a recent study involving an East Indian population, authors suggested an association between the IL1β gene polymorphisms and H. pylori-mediated duodenal ulcer risk. They further observed effects of specific IL1β genotypes on the expression of IL1β mRNA in the gastric mucosa. Their in vivo studies were further substantiated, for the first time, by in vitro experiments, which represent the opposite homozygous risk genotypes that were observed in duodenal ulcer patients [30]. So this might explain the fact that differences in carcinogenesis risk in people from different geographical areas might reflect differences in their genetic make up.

The developing Country enigma: Indians, diet and predisposition to gastric cancer?

What is enigmatic about the gastric cancer scenario in India? The answer is not simple. This Country has a high prevalence of H. pylori infections and a low risk of gastric cancer in contrast to some of the developed countries with a low H. pylori colonization rate like China and Japan. India is known for a very high incidence of H. pylori infection [31, 32]. Biologically inactive CagA could be a contributory factor in low prevalence of gastric ulcers and cancer in India. However, phenotyping studies based on in vitro assessment of CagA function in Indian isolates have not been done. In our opinion it will be inappropriate to implicate CagA functionality alone. The spectrum and outcome of pathology in H. pylori infection is intricately governed by all the three factors – virulence, host genetics and the environment. It appears that the environment of stomach (acidity, buffering and mucus content) governed by lifestyle factors (diet, food habits, alcoholism, oral hygiene, water hygiene, personal hygiene, proximity with farming communities and animals) and the genetic determinants of susceptibility are chief drivers of the pathological outcome. Although poverty-associated factors (overcrowding, poor sanitation, lower socioeconomic status, compromised water hygiene etc.) in countries like India facilitate high frequency of H. pylori colonization, rapid re-colonization post eradication and lower age of acquisition [33]; a surprising fact is that such areas are at lowest risk of developing gastric cancer [34]. Correlation between H. pylori infection and gastric cancer has so far been unsuccessful in India [35]. A recent study from India involving 279 patients with gastric neoplasms failed to show a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with gastric neoplasms as compared to the controls (101 non-ulcer dyspepsia and 355 healthy subjects) [36]. These observations challenge the versatility of simplified models of gastric carcinogenesis based on H. pylori infection. We believe that in Indian context, diet as a major environmental factor governs the dynamics of gastric cancer demography mainly by regulating physiological integrity of gastric mucosal niches. And that is where; the dietary practices and lifestyle factors become important in the context of progression from gastritis to gastric cancer. Diets low in vegetables, fibers and fruits and high in salt-preserved foods or salt-processed meat increase the risk of stomach cancer [37].

Accordingly, in such situations there seems to be a difference in the distribution frequency of gastric cancer incidence. The southern and eastern parts of India have higher frequency of gastric cancer than rest of the Country [38]. Rice is the staple food in south, whereas fish, meat, spices and salts are the main food items in eastern part [3739]. Contrastingly, the large vegetarian population in northern India is at lower risk of gastric cancer. But the times are changing; rapid flourish of post globalization corporate culture brought fast foods, germ-free bottled water, pasteurized milk and preserved meat items to the present day lifestyle in big Indian cities. However, it will be too early to link it with rising gastric cancer incidences in cities in India [39].

Conversely, low to negligible incidence of gastric cancer as recorded for rural areas in India by the national cancer registry [39] leads us to speculate why rural communities have distinct advantages in terms of less damages from H. pylori infection. It needs to be investigated if these advantages are due to their diet based on fresh farm produce and their 'friendship' with the so-called "old friends", the group of bacteria that might be maintaining levels of regulatory immune cell populations and have been intricately associated during most of the mammalian evolution.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Prof. Seyed E. Hasnain for his guidance and for discussions.

YA is recipient of Junior Research Fellowship from Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India. Research in the laboratory of NA was supported by grants from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pathogen Evolution Group, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Shri Shivaji College of Arts, Commerce and Science

References

  1. Dunn BE, Cohen H, Blaser MJ: Helicobacter pylori. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997, 10: 720-741.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Colding H, Hartzen SH, Roshanisefat H, Andersen LP, Krogfelt KA: Molecular methods for typing of Helicobacter pylori and their applications. FEMS Immunol. 1999, 24: 193-199. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1999.tb01282.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Atherton JC: The pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori -induced gastro-duodenal diseases. Annual Reviews in Pathology. 2006, 1: 63-96. 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Devi SM, Ahmed I, Khan AA, Rahman SA, Alvi A, Sechi LA, Ahmed N: Genomes of Helicobacter pylori from native Peruvians suggest admixture of ancestral and modern lineages and reveal a western type cag-pathogenicity island. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 191-10.1186/1471-2164-7-191.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Franchini M, Veneri D: Helicobacter pylori infection and immune thrombocytopenic purpura: an update. Helicobacter. 2004, 9: 342-346. 10.1111/j.1083-4389.2004.00238.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson S, Beck PL, Pineo GF, Poon MC: Helicobacter pylori eradication: novel therapy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura? A review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 2005, 78: 142-150. 10.1002/ajh.20250.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pellicano R, Fagoonee S, Rizzetto M, Ponzetto A: Helicobacter pylori and coronary heart disease: Which directions for future studies?. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2003, 29: 351-359.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gasbarrini A, Carloni E, Gasbarrini G, Chisholm SA: Helicobacter pylori and extragastric diseases – other Helicobacters. Helicobacter. 2004, 9: 57-66. 10.1111/j.1083-4389.2004.00249.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ: Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345: 784-789. 10.1056/NEJMoa001999.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuipers EJ, Perez-Perez GI, Meuwissen SG, Blaser MJ: Helicobacter pylori and atrophic gastritis: importance of the cagA status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995, 87: 1777-1780. 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1777.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Kleanthous H, Cover TL, Peek RM, Chyou PH, Stemmermann GN, Nomura A: Infection with Helicobacter pylori strains possessing cagA is associated with an increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Cancer Res. 1995, 55: 2111-2115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Orentreich N, Vogelman H: Risk for gastric cancer in people with CagA positive or CagA negative Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 1997, 40: 297-301.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatakeyama M: Oncogenic mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori cag A protein. Nature Rev Cancer. 2004, 4: 688-694. 10.1038/nrc1433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamaoka Y, Kodama T, Kashima K, Graham DY, Sepulveda AR: Variants of the 3' region of the cag A gene in Helicobacter pylori isolates from patients with different H. pylori-associated diseases. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 2258-2263.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Azuma T, Yamakawa A, Yamazaki S, Ohtani M, Ito Y, Muramatsu A, Suto H, Yamazaki Y, Keida Y, Higashi H, Hatakeyama M: Distinct diversity of the cag pathogenicity island among Helicobacter pylori strains in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2508-2517. 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2508-2517.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Argent RH, Kidd M, Owen RJ, Thomas RJ, Limb MC, Atherton JC: Determinants and consequences of different levels of CagA phosphorylation for clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 2004, 127: 514-523. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sunny L, Yeole BB, Hakama M, Shiri R, Mathews S, Falah Hassani K, Advani SH: Decreasing trend in the incidence of stomach cancer in Mumbai, India, during 1988 to 1999. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2004, 5: 169-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Figueiredo C, Quint W, Nouhan N, van den Munckhof H, Herbrink P, Scherpenisse J, de Boer W, Schneeberger P, Perez-Perez G, Blaser MJ, van Doorn LJ: Assessment of Helicobacter pylori vac A and cag A genotypes and host serological response. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1339-1344. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1339-1344.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gebert B, Fischer W, Weiss E, Hoffmann R, Haas R: Helicobacter pylori Vacuolating Cytotoxin Inhibits T Lymphocyte Activation. Science. 2003, 301: 1099-1102. 10.1126/science.1086871.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliveira MJ, Costa AC, Costa AM, Henriques L, Suriano G, Atherton JC, Machado JC, Carneiro F, Seruca R, Mareel M, Leroy A, Figueiredo C: Helicobacter pylori Induces Gastric Epithelial Cell Invasion in a c-Met and Type IV Secretion System-dependent Manner. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 34888-34896. 10.1074/jbc.M607067200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Aviles-Jimenez F, Letley DP, Gonzalez-Valencia G, Salama N, Torres J, Atherton JC: Evolution of the Helicobacter pylori vacuolating cytotoxin in a human stomach. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 5182-5185. 10.1128/JB.186.15.5182-5185.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Prouzet-Mauleon V, Hussain MA, Lamouliatte H, Kauser F, Megraud F, Ahmed N: Pathogen evolution in vivo : genome dynamics of two isolates obtained 9 years apart from a duodenal ulcer patient infected with a single Helicobacter pylori strain. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4237-4241. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4237-4241.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Aras RA, Fischer W, Perez-Perez GI, Crosatti M, Ando T, Haas R, Blaser MJ: Plasticity of repetitive DNA sequences within a bacterial (Type IV) secretion system component. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 1349-1360. 10.1084/jem.20030381.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kersulyte D, Chalkauskas H, Berg DE: Emergence of recombinant strains of Helicobacter pylori during human infection. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 31: 31-43. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01140.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall BJ: The future of Helicobacter pylori eradication: a personal perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997, 1: 109-115. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.11.s1.14.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuipers OP, Buist G, Kok J: Current strategies for improving food bacteria. Res Microbiol. 2000, 151: 815-822. 10.1016/S0923-2508(00)01147-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Carroll IM, Ahmed N, Beesley SM, Khan AA, Ghousunnissa S, Morain CA, Habibullah CM, Smyth CJ: Microevolution between paired antral and paired antrum and corpus Helicobacter pylori isolates recovered from individual patients. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 53: 669-677. 10.1099/jmm.0.05440-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. El-Omar EM, Oien K, El-Nujumi A, Gillen D, Wirz A, Dahill S, Williams C, Ardill JE, McColl KE: Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic gastric acid hyposecretion. Gastroenterology. 1997, 113: 15-24. 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70075-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansson LE, Nyren O, Hsing AW, Bergstrom R, Josefsson S, Chow WH, Fraumeni JF, Adami HO: The risk of stomach cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335: 242-249. 10.1056/NEJM199607253350404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Chakravorty M, Ghosh A, Choudhury A, Santra A, Hembrum J, Roychoudhury S: Interaction between IL1B gene promoter polymorphisms in determining susceptibility to Helicobacter pylori associated duodenal ulcer. Hum Mutat. 2006, 27: 411-419. 10.1002/humu.20299.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Abasiyanik MF, Tunc M, Salih BA: Enzyme immunoassay and immunoblotting analysis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Turkish asymptomatic subjects. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004, 50: 173-177. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.07.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ahmed N: 23 years of the discovery of Helicobacter pylori : is the debate over?. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2005, 4: 17-10.1186/1476-0711-4-17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh K, Ghoshal UC: Causal role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric cancer: an Asian enigma. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 1346-1351.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Miwa H, Go MF, Sato N: H pylori and gastric cancer: the Asian enigma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97: 1106-1112. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05663.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Khanna AK, Seth P, Nath G, Dixit VK, Kumar M: Correlation of Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinoma. J Postgrad Med. 2002, 48: 27-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ghoshal UC, Guha D, Bandyopadhyay S, Pal C, Chakraborty S, Ghoshal U, Ghosh TK, Pal BB, Banerjee PK: Gastric adenocarcinoma of MALT lymphoma with successful anti-H pylori therapy and in a patient re-infected with H pylori after regression gastric resection: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2002, 2: 6-10.1186/1471-230X-2-6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gajalakshmi CK, Shanta V: Lifestyle and risk of stomach cancer: a hospital-based case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 1996, 25: 1146-1153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Mathew A, Gangadharan P, Varghese C, Nair MK: Diet and stomach cancer: a case-control study in South India. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000, 9: 89-97. 10.1097/00008469-200004000-00004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. National Cancer Registry Programme, India (Indian Council of Medical Research). [http://www.canceratlasindia.org/about.htm]

Copyright

© Akhter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement